journal article·2016-07-02Open access

Understanding bioenergy production and optimisation at the nanoscale – a review

K. M. Rahman, L. Melville, S. M. Imamul Huq, S. K. Khoda

Abstract

Nanotechnology has an increasingly large impact on a wide range of biotechnological, pharmacological and pure technological applications. Its current use in bioenergy production from biomass is very limited. This paper examines the potential interrelationships between nanotechnology and bioenergy production through a comprehensive literature review and analysis of data from biomass characterisation studies. The aim of this review is to indicate how nanotechnology can be applied in biomass-to-bioenergy conversion. This study shows currently nanotechnology has been applied in the production of only two types of biomass, i.e. sludge and algae. Hence, interaction of nanomaterials with active sludge and algal cells were examined. Our extensive literature review indicates that anaerobic digestion process in sludge can potentially be enhanced by using magnetite nanoparticles, which gives higher methane yields. On the other hand, nanosilver reduces growth and causes adverse effects on the morphology of green algae. This process for bioenergy generation has already been successfully applied to sludge and algae biomass. Our study confirms that the process can also be used in the production of bioenergy from the other biomasses, such as agricultural wastes and industrial residues. Outcomes of this work will be an important tool for implementing nanotechnology in bioenergy research.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.05.00310.1016/j.copbio.2013.05.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.trac.2010.11.01410.1016/j.trac.2010.11.014 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.03510.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.035 ↗
4. 10.1021/la020237410.1021/la0202374 ↗
5. Tiwari Dhermendra K · World Appl Sci J. · 2008 · 3 · 417
6. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.05810.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 ↗
7. 10.1038/nbt87510.1038/nbt875 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20120592310.1002/anie.201205923 ↗
9. 10.1080/08927014.2013.87341910.1080/08927014.2013.873419 ↗
10. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394381-1.00005-210.1016/B978-0-12-394381-1.00005-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.02210.1016/j.joen.2013.08.022 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0335370710.1007/BF03353707 ↗
13. 10.1021/ie801542g10.1021/ie801542g ↗
14. Nguyen MD. Effects of CeO2and ZnO nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion and toxicity of digested sludge [dissertation]. Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology; 2013.
15. Víctor FP · 2011
16. 10.1021/ar200336810.1021/ar2003368 ↗
17. 10.1134/S106235901004011410.1134/S1062359010040114 ↗
18. 10.1002/tox.1000010.1002/tox.10000 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00108-410.1016/S0305-4179(99)00108-4 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00253-009-2159-510.1007/s00253-009-2159-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.08510.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.085 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.04710.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10646-008-0217-x10.1007/s10646-008-0217-x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.01510.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.015 ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20130370310.1002/smll.201303703 ↗
26. Wencheng M · J Harbin Inst Technol. · 2015 · 22 · 69
27. 10.1016/j.catcom.2010.12.03210.1016/j.catcom.2010.12.032 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.05710.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.01610.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016 ↗
30. 10.1021/es901695c10.1021/es901695c ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.05.02210.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.05.022 ↗
32. 10.1897/08-090.110.1897/08-090.1 ↗
33. 10.1128/AEM.00650-1010.1128/AEM.00650-10 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nano.2010.02.00110.1016/j.nano.2010.02.001 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11051-008-9428-610.1007/s11051-008-9428-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.watres.2008.02.02110.1016/j.watres.2008.02.021 ↗
37. 10.1128/AEM.02218-0610.1128/AEM.02218-06 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.10110.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.101 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.09610.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.096 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.04.01210.1016/j.aquatox.2012.04.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.enmm.2014.11.00210.1016/j.enmm.2014.11.002 ↗
42. 10.1002/etc.71610.1002/etc.716 ↗
43. Zada B · Int J Sci. · 2013 · 2 · 78
44. 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.01210.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.012 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.02310.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.023 ↗
46. 10.2217/nnm.10.9810.2217/nnm.10.98 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00253-013-5473-x10.1007/s00253-013-5473-x ↗
48. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.10010.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.100 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005 ↗
50. Theivasanthi T · Ann Biol Res. · 2011 · 2 · 368
51. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.07310.1016/j.rser.2015.05.073 ↗
52. Moon RJ. Nanomaterials in the forest products industry. Chicago (IL): McGraw-Hill Yearbook in Science & Technology; 2006. p. 226–229.
53. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.05610.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.056 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.01210.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.02210.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.022 ↗