Differential cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Concerns about the potential health hazards of nanomaterials are growing. To determine the potential toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles, human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and H4 neuroglioma cells were exposed to Fe2O3, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles and their metal ion counterparts (Fe3+, Cu2+ and Zn2+) at a concentration range of 0.01–100 µM for 48 h, under the cell culture conditions: 95% O2, 5% CO2, 85% humidity, 37°C. Their ensemble cell viability was determined by MTS cell proliferation assay. A live/dead cell assay was also performed, and cellular images were acquired by a high-content fluorescence microscope and quantified by a novel computerised image analysis protocol. Our data indicated that exposure of these nanoparticles induced differential toxic effects in both SH-SY5Y and H4 cells, and the cells had dose-dependent toxic responses to the CuO nanoparticle insult. In conclusion, the toxic responses of the nanoparticles are complex, and they warrant further in vivo studies. However, it remains to be determined if these nanopartilces have synergistically enhancing or cancelling toxic effects upon both SH-SY5Y and H4 cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Department of Radiology , Functional and Molecular Imaging Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
b Department of Psychiatry, Neurochemistry Laboratory , Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Charlestown , MA , USA
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/1743-8977-3-1110.1186/1743-8977-3-11 ↗
2. 10.1152/ajplung.1999.276.4.L60410.1152/ajplung.1999.276.4.L604 ↗
3. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.990505210.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9905052 ↗
4. 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.1.L2510.1152/ajplung.2000.278.1.L25 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:100765390006310.1023/A:1007653900063 ↗
6. 10.2174/15672010677635923010.2174/156720106776359230 ↗
7. 10.1080/1061186040001593610.1080/10611860400015936 ↗
8. 10.1186/1743-8977-2-810.1186/1743-8977-2-8 ↗
9. 10.1021/es062726m10.1021/es062726m ↗
10. 10.1186/1472-6750-7-6610.1186/1472-6750-7-66 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.111439710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
12. 10.1093/jnci/djj02810.1093/jnci/djj028 ↗
13. 10.1186/1477-3155-5-110.1186/1477-3155-5-1 ↗
14. 10.1021/la060093j10.1021/la060093j ↗
15. 10.1080/0895837049043959710.1080/08958370490439597 ↗
16. 10.1002/jnr.2004110.1002/jnr.20041 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl061025k10.1021/nl061025k ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.07810.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.078 ↗
19. Kedar N · J. Postgrad. Med. · 2003 · 49 · 236
20. 10.1196/annals.1306.01210.1196/annals.1306.012 ↗
21. 10.3233/JAD-2006-102-30910.3233/JAD-2006-102-309 ↗
22. 10.3233/JAD-2006-102-30310.3233/JAD-2006-102-303 ↗
23. Rossi L · Ital. J. Biochem. · 2006 · 55 · 212