journal article·2023-12-31Open access

Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activities of Cu-Ag bimetallic oxide nanocomposites using Eichhornia crassipes aqueous leaf extract

Alebel Nibret Belay, Mulat Esmelalem Mihretu, Tsegaye Gashaw Getnet

Abstract

Green synthesis of bimetallic oxide nanocomposite with leaf extract of Eichhornia crassipes (1) is attracted much in recent researchers. The as-synthesized CuO/Ag2O/Ext (2) and CuO/Ag2O NCPs (3) were characterized by UV-Vis, FT-IR, SEM, XRD, and TGA. The disc diffusion method was used to assess the antibacterial potential of (1), (2), and (3) against a total of four human pathogens bacteria. S. aureus and S. epidermides were the growth inhibitory effect in the range of 6.3 ± 0.33 mm, 26 ± 0.58 to 30 ± 0.58 mm, and 23 ± 0.15 to 30 ± 0.58 mm and 6.7 ± 0.33 mm, 22.3 ± 0.88 to 26.3 ± 0.88 mm, and 26 ± 0.58 to 28 ± 0.58 mm for (1), (2), and (3), respectively. Whereas, E. coli and K. pneumonia showed in the range of 7.00 mm, 26.7 ± 0.88 to 29.3 ± 0.33 mm, and 22.7 ± 0.88 to 27.3 ± 0.88 mm and 6.3 ± 0.33 mm, 25 ± 0.88 to 27.3 ± 0.33 mm, and 25.7 ± 0.33 to 27 ± 0.58 mm for (1), (2), and (3), respectively. The XRD technique confirmed the nano-size structure of (2) and (3) (D = 33.41 nm and 28.22 nm, respectively).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Reza A, Khan JM. Water hyacinth as cattle feed. Indian. J Anim Sci. 1981;51(11):1–19.
2. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.00910.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.009 ↗
3. 10.15666/aeer/1004_49350210.15666/aeer/1004_493502 ↗
4. Young-Hyun L. Cellulose structure modification and hydrolysis. 1st ed., New York (NY): Wiley; 1986. p.1–18.
5. Hemalatha S, Makeswari M. Green synthesis, characterization and antibacterial studies of CuO nanoparticles from Eichhornia crassipes. Rasayan J Chem. 2017;10(3):838–843.
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.02910.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.029 ↗
7. Ali H, Patel M, Ganesh N, et al. The world’s worst aquatic plant as a safe cancer medicine-Antitumor activity on melanoma induced mouse by Eichhornia crassipes: in vivo studies. J Pharm Res. 2009;2:1365–1366.
8. Jayanthi P, Lalitha P. Determination of the in vitro reducing power of the aqueous extract of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. J Pharm Res. 2011;4:4003–4005.
9. 10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300010019x10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300010019x ↗
10. Mathur P, Mathur SM. Water hyacinth: a useful plant to improve the rural economy. Water Sci Technol. 2017;80:31–38.
11. Cerveira-Junior WR, Carvalho LB. Control of water hyacinth: a short review. Commun Plant Sci. 2019;9(1):129–132.
12. 10.1515/jppr-2015-004110.1515/jppr-2015-0041 ↗
13. 10.21767/2248-9215.10002910.21767/2248-9215.100029 ↗
14. 10.1017/inp.2017.3010.1017/inp.2017.30 ↗
15. Bindu T, Ramasamy EV. High solids anaerobic digestion for the recovery of energy and manure from Taro (Colocasia esculenta). J Solid Waste Technol Manag. 2005;31(2):69–77.
16. Nagassa D, Belay A. Current status of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Ethiopia: achievements, challenges and prospects: a review. J Environ Earth Sci. 2020;10(10):36–47.
17. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00818-X10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00818-X ↗
18. 10.1038/nnano.2016.7110.1038/nnano.2016.71 ↗
19. 10.4236/gsc.2016.6100410.4236/gsc.2016.61004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.00810.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.008 ↗
21. 10.1021/bp050142310.1021/bp0501423 ↗
22. Nemade KR, Waghuley SA. LPG sensing performance of CuO/Ag2O bimetallic oxide nanoparticles. St Petersburg Polytechn Univ J Phys. Math. 2015;1(3):249–255.
23. 10.1039/c3ta13277c10.1039/c3ta13277c ↗
24. Rahman MM, Alam MM, Hussain MM, et al. Hydrothermally prepared Ag2O/CuO nanomaterial for an efficient chemical sensor development for environmental remediation. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2018;10:1–9.
25. Kalaiarasi R, Jayallakshmi, N, Venkatachalam. Phytosynthesis of nanoparticles and its applications – a review. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2010;11:1–16.
26. 10.1166/rase.2014.106910.1166/rase.2014.1069 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.03.01710.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.03.017 ↗
28. 10.1080/17458080.2022.216152510.1080/17458080.2022.2161525 ↗
29. 10.1080/17458080.2021.187278110.1080/17458080.2021.1872781 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.02.01910.1016/j.micpath.2017.02.019 ↗
31. Lalitha P, Sripathi S, Jayanthi P. Secondary metabolites of Eichhornia crassipes (Water hyacinth): a review (1949 to 2011). Nat Prod Commun. 2012;7(9):1249–1256.
32. 10.1080/10942912.2022.211259810.1080/10942912.2022.2112598 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11356-017-9177-010.1007/s11356-017-9177-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60082-810.1016/S2221-1691(11)60082-8 ↗
35. 10.1007/s13204-016-0517-z10.1007/s13204-016-0517-z ↗
36. Aziz WJ, Jassim HA. Green chemistry for the preparation of silver nanoparticles using mint leaf leaves extracts and evaluation of their antimicrobial potential. WNOFNS. 2018;18(2):163–170.
37. 10.1007/s10876-020-01797-510.1007/s10876-020-01797-5 ↗
38. El-Kemary M, El-Shamy H, El-Mehasseb I. Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin drug in water using ZnO nanoparticles. J Lumen. 2010;130(12):2327–2331.
39. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12736410.1016/j.matlet.2020.127364 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.06110.1016/j.aca.2005.12.061 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.02210.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.022 ↗
42. 10.5185/amlett.2013.icnano.10810.5185/amlett.2013.icnano.108 ↗
43. Kumar H, Manisha K. Synthesis and characterization of silver-oxide nanoparticles by sol-gel method. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng. 2018;7(3):632–637.
44. Taufik A, Saleh R. The influence of graphene on silver oxide synthesis through the microwave-assisted method. AIP Conf Proc. 2018;2023:0200181–0200184.
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.23910.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.239 ↗
46. 10.1080/17458080.2015.107753410.1080/17458080.2015.1077534 ↗
47. 10.1038/nnano.2011.14510.1038/nnano.2011.145 ↗
48. 10.3390/molecules2603058610.3390/molecules26030586 ↗
49. 10.1021/cm970552p10.1021/cm970552p ↗
50. 10.1039/c3ay42141d10.1039/c3ay42141d ↗
51. 10.2298/JMMB120927025K10.2298/JMMB120927025K ↗
52. 10.1007/s10562-009-9948-410.1007/s10562-009-9948-4 ↗
53. 10.1143/JJAP.47.507010.1143/JJAP.47.5070 ↗
54. 10.1023/A:101440581137110.1023/A:1014405811371 ↗