journal article·2016-08-12Open access

Effect of nanoparticle behaviour on mud cake buildup for directional and horizontal wells: mathematical modelling and experimental study

M. Sedaghatzadeh, M.H. Ghazanfari, K. Shahbazi, G. Zargar

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of nanoparticle size and geometry on filter cake buildup during dynamic filtration using experimental and modeling approaches. A dynamic filtration setup was proposed and designed to test cross-flow circulation against a synthetic core at a constant differential pressure. The proposed mathematical model considers the critical deposition boundary of the porous media for particles along with drag, lift, friction, buoyancy, permeate, and electrostatic forces. The comprehensive model response allowed investigation of the aggregation and shape of nanoparticles at different cross-flow inclinations. The drag and lift force coefficients and moment of inertia of the nanoparticles were determined using cluster structures of nanoparticles identified using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and fractal theory. The deposition and erosion intensity index of all solid particles were experimentally determined and used in the model. Electronic microscope images of the mud cake surface confirmed the proposed cluster structure of the aggregated particles. The mud cake thickness measured by dynamic filtration tests and the nanoparticle-bentonite weight ratio acquired by DLS showed good agreement with the mathematical model results. The proposed approach allows selection of the optimum shape and size of the nano-solid particles as additives to minimize mud cake buildup along the borehole.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Groundwater flow and contamination studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Peng SJ · SPE paper 23824. SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium; · 1992
2. 10.1016/j.petrol.2004.12.00310.1016/j.petrol.2004.12.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/0920-4105(94)90039-610.1016/0920-4105(94)90039-6 ↗
4. Civan F. · SPE paper 52147. Mid-continent Operations Symposium; · 1999
5. Fordham EJ · SPE paper 18038. 63rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 1988
6. Khatib Z. · SPE paper 28488. SPE 69th Annual Technical Conference · 1994
7. Civan F · SPE paper 35213. SPE Permian Basin Oil & Gas Recovery Conference · 1996
8. 10.2118/25215-PA10.2118/25215-PA ↗
9. Al-Abduwani FAH · SPE paper 94635, SPE European Formation Damage Conference · 2005
10. 10.1006/jcis.1994.106010.1006/jcis.1994.1060 ↗
11. Kalantariasl A · SPE International Symposium on Formation Damage Control · 2014
12. 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.04.01110.1016/j.petrol.2011.04.011 ↗
13. 10.1080/1091646080210566610.1080/10916460802105666 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00235-910.1016/S0376-7388(96)00235-9 ↗
15. 10.1205/02638760052788810.1205/026387600527888 ↗
16. Amanullah Md · J Petroleum Technol. · 2012 · 64 · 11
17. Chenevert EM · US patent 0314549 · 2009
18. Amanullah Md · SPE Saudi Arabian Section Technical Symposium · 2009
19. Abdo J · Nano Sci Technol Institute-Nanotech · 2010 · 3
20. Al-Abdullatif Z · 8th International Conference on Chemistry · 2010
21. 10.1016/0009-2509(73)85070-510.1016/0009-2509(73)85070-5 ↗
22. 10.1006/jcis.1996.000510.1006/jcis.1996.0005 ↗
23. 10.1119/1.1329510.1119/1.13295 ↗
24. White FM. Viscous fluid flow. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1991.
25. 10.2118/26121-PA10.2118/26121-PA ↗
26. 10.1016/0032-5910(93)80051-B10.1016/0032-5910(93)80051-B ↗
27. 10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-710.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7 ↗
28. 10.1021/ie00032a01210.1021/ie00032a012 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00178-810.1016/S0032-5910(98)00178-8 ↗
30. Derjaguin B · Acta Phys Chim. · 1941 · 14 · 633
31. 10.1007/978-94-015-9074-710.1007/978-94-015-9074-7 ↗
32. Israelachvili J. · 2006
33. 10.1115/1.402323610.1115/1.4023236 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.05.00110.1016/j.powtec.2010.05.001 ↗
35. 10.1017/S002211206899999010.1017/S0022112068999990 ↗
36. Willis MS · Chem Eng ResDesign · 1983 · 61 · 96
37. 10.1007/s11242-011-9839-110.1007/s11242-011-9839-1 ↗
38. 10.2136/vzj2007.009210.2136/vzj2007.0092 ↗
39. Ravi KM · SPE paper 24571. 67th Annual Technical Conference · 1992
40. 10.2118/98-03-0310.2118/98-03-03 ↗
41. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
42. 10.1021/es020931610.1021/es0209316 ↗
43. Peden JM · European Petroleum Conference · 1990
44. Sumer M, Serife SH. Solid-liquid two phase flow. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier science; 2008. Chapters 2, 31.
45. 10.2118/20422-PA10.2118/20422-PA ↗
46. Yang SR · J Daq Petrol Inst. · 1997 · 21 · 126
47. Zamora M · Petrol Eng Int · 1991 · 44