Recent developments in the application of hydrogels as draw agents in the forward osmosis desalination process
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The shortage of water resources has been one of the most worrying world crises. Thus, one promising way to address the need for water is desalination. In recent years, forward osmosis has been an emerging technique in water treatment applications, especially desalination. This is due to the enhanced quality of water production, which resulted from reduced fouling propensity and high salt rejection. However, the selection of an ideal draw agent for the forward osmosis desalination process is still a challenging issue. Draw agents for forward osmosis desalination should be distinguished with their high osmotic pressure, low reverse solute flux, and facile regeneration. Lately, hydrogels have offered some advantages, such as negligible reverse solute flux and their capability to capture large amounts of water. These merits made different types of hydrogels, like thermoresponsive, electroresponsive, magnetic responsive, gas-responsive, multi-responsive, green, and other hydrogels’ classes, be recognized as draw agents for forward osmosis desalination. In this review, we will describe how hydrogels could be applied as drawing agents for the forward osmosis desalination approach and their operational advantages and drawbacks. In addition, we will display and discuss the recent research output that aimed to improve the performance of hydrogels as draw agents for the forward osmosis desalination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Hamiche AM, Stambouli AB, Flazi S (2016) A review of the water-energy nexus. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:319–33110.1016/j.rser.2016.07.020 ↗
2. Ding C et al (2019) Application of polysaccharide derivatives as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for desalination and protein concentration. Chem Eng Res Des 146:211–22010.1016/j.cherd.2019.04.005 ↗
3. Ali S et al (2024) MoS2@ Ti3C2Tx heterostructure: a new negative electrode material for Li-ion hybrid supercapacitors. Chem Eng J 498:15533010.1016/j.cej.2024.155330 ↗
4. Padder FA, Bashir A (2023) Scarcity of water in the twenty-first century: problems and potential remedies. MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation 4(1):1–510.59733/medalion.v4i1.66 ↗
5. Ruzvidzo KH, Kaur R, Jain M (2024) Novel polyelectrolyte-glycol ether ternary phase-separating draw solutions for desalination using forward osmosis. Desalination 586:11789710.1016/j.desal.2024.117897 ↗
6. Khondoker M et al (2023) Freshwater shortage, salinity increase, and global food production: a need for sustainable irrigation water desalination—a scoping review. Earth 4(2):223–24010.3390/earth4020012 ↗
7. Madhav S et al (2020) Water pollutants: sources and impact on the environment and human health. Sensors in water pollutants monitoring: role of material pp. 43–6210.1007/978-981-15-0671-0_4 ↗
8. Loucks DP et al (2017) Water resources planning and management: an overview. Water resource systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models, and applications, pp 1–4910.1007/978-3-319-44234-1_1 ↗
9. Joseph N et al (2020) A review of the assessment of sustainable water use at continental-to-global scale. Sustain Water Resour Manage 6:1–2010.1007/s40899-020-00379-7 ↗
10. Ahmadi E et al (2020) The role of renewable energy resources in sustainability of water desalination as a potential fresh-water source: an updated review. Sustainability 12(13):523310.3390/su12135233 ↗
11. Chaoui I et al (2019) Water desalination by forward osmosis: draw solutes and recovery methods–review. Environ Technol Rev 8(1):25–4610.1080/21622515.2019.1623324 ↗
12. Kaygusuz K (2012) Energy for sustainable development: a case of developing countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(2):1116–112610.1016/j.rser.2011.11.013 ↗
13. Ahmed I et al (2017) Importance and significance of UF/MF membrane systems in desalination water treatment. Desalination 18710.5772/intechopen.68694 ↗
14. Ali S et al (2024) Recent advances of transition metal dichalcogenides-based materials for energy storage devices, in view of monovalent to divalent ions. Chem Record 24(1):e20230014510.1002/tcr.202300145 ↗
15. Sobhy D et al (2025) High-performance PVA/functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. Results Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10514910.1016/j.rineng.2025.105149 ↗
16. Bundschuh J et al (2015) Low-cost low-enthalpy geothermal heat for freshwater production: innovative applications using thermal desalination processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:196–20610.1016/j.rser.2014.10.102 ↗
17. Alejo T et al (2017) Advances in draw solutes for forward osmosis: hybrid organic-inorganic nanoparticles and conventional solutes. Chem Eng J 309:738–75210.1016/j.cej.2016.10.079 ↗
18. Long Q et al (2018) Recent advance on draw solutes development in forward osmosis. Processes 6(9):16510.3390/pr6090165 ↗
19. Aende A, Gardy J, Hassanpour A (2020) Seawater desalination: a review of forward osmosis technique, its challenges, and future prospects. Processes 8(8):90110.3390/pr8080901 ↗
20. Salehi AA et al (2021) Hydrogel materials as an emerging platform for desalination and the production of purified water. Sep Purif Rev 50(4):380–39910.1080/15422119.2020.1789659 ↗
21. Elrakhawi M et al (2024) Modeling and experimental validation of nanophotonics-enhanced solar membrane distillation technology for treating reverse osmosis brine. Appl Water Sci 15(1):1110.1007/s13201-024-02281-5 ↗
22. Elrakhawi M et al (2025) Modeling and experimental validation of nanophotonics-enhanced solar membrane distillation technology for treating reverse osmosis brine. Appl Water Sci 15(1):1110.1007/s13201-024-02281-5 ↗
23. Ankoliya D, Mehta B, Raval H (2019) Advances in surface modification techniques of reverse osmosis membrane over the years. Sep Sci Technol 54(3):293–31010.1080/01496395.2018.1483404 ↗
24. Schiffler M (2004) Perspectives and challenges for desalination in the 21st century. Desalination 165:1–9
25. Younos T, Tulou KE (2005) Overview of desalination techniques. J Contemp Water Res Educ 132:3–1010.1111/j.1936-704X.2005.mp132001002.x ↗
26. Feria-Díaz JJ et al (2021) Commercial thermal technologies for desalination of water from renewable energies: a state of the art review. Processes 9(2):26210.3390/pr9020262 ↗
27. Tareemi AA, Sharshir SW (2023) A state-of-art overview of multi-stage flash desalination and water treatment: principles, challenges, and heat recovery in hybrid systems. Solar Energy 266:11215710.1016/j.solener.2023.112157 ↗
28. Al-Hotmani OMA et al (2020) Scope and limitations of the mathematical models developed for the forward feed multi-effect distillation process—a review. Processes 8(9):117410.3390/pr8091174 ↗
29. Shamet O, Antar M (2023) Mechanical vapor compression desalination technology–a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 187:11375710.1016/j.rser.2023.113757 ↗
30. Greenlee LF et al (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43(9):2317–234810.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010 ↗
31. Zhou D et al (2015) Development of lower cost seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration technologies—a review. Desalination 376:109–11610.1016/j.desal.2015.08.020 ↗
32. Al-Amshawee S et al (2020) Electrodialysis desalination for water and wastewater: a review. Chem Eng J 380:12223110.1016/j.cej.2019.122231 ↗
33. Aliyu UM, Rathilal S, Isa YM (2018) Membrane desalination technologies in water treatment: a review. Water Pract Technol 13(4):738–75210.2166/wpt.2018.084 ↗
34. Zhang L, Sun X, Wu S (2024) A comprehensive review of responsive draw solutes in forward osmosis: categories, characteristics, mechanisms and modifications. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.11767610.1016/j.desal.2024.117676 ↗
35. Altaee A, Zaragoza G, van Tonningen HR (2014) Comparison between forward osmosis-reverse osmosis and reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination 336:50–5710.1016/j.desal.2014.01.002 ↗
36. Suwaileh W et al (2020) Forward osmosis membranes and processes: a comprehensive review of research trends and future outlook. Desalination 485:11445510.1016/j.desal.2020.114455 ↗
37. Johnson DJ et al (2018) Osmotic’s potential: an overview of draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination 434:100–12010.1016/j.desal.2017.09.017 ↗
38. Cath T, Childress A, Elimelech M (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 281(1–2):70–8710.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048 ↗
39. Dabaghian Z, Rahimpour A (2015) Carboxylated carbon nanofibers as hydrophilic porous material to modification of cellulosic membranes for forward osmosis desalination. Chem Eng Res Des 104:647–65710.1016/j.cherd.2015.10.008 ↗
40. Ali MT, Le-Clech P, Taylor RA (2021) Assessment of physicochemical performance of draw compounds for desalination using multi-criteria analysis. Desalination 507:11485910.1016/j.desal.2020.114859 ↗
41. Zhao S et al (2012) Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci 396:1–2110.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023 ↗
42. Zhao D et al (2016) Multi-functional forward osmosis draw solutes for seawater desalination. Chin J Chem Eng 24(1):23–3010.1016/j.cjche.2015.06.018 ↗
43. Petrinic I et al (2024) Commercial thermo-responsive polyalkylene glycols as draw agents in forward osmosis. Desalination 582:11757610.1016/j.desal.2024.117576 ↗
44. Abounahia N et al (2023) Desalination by the forward osmosis: advancement and challenges. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16390110.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163901 ↗
45. Zhao D et al (2014) A dendrimer-based forward osmosis draw solute for seawater desalination. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(42):16170–1617510.1021/ie5031997 ↗
46. Cai Y et al (2015) Energy-efficient desalination by forward osmosis using responsive ionic liquid draw solutes. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 1(3):341–34710.1039/C4EW00073K ↗
47. Ray SS et al (2016) Forward osmosis desalination by utilizing chlorhexidine gluconate based mouthwash as a reusable draw solute. Chem Eng J 304:962–96910.1016/j.cej.2016.07.023 ↗
48. Qasim M et al (2017) Forward osmosis desalination using ferric sulfate draw solute. Desalination 423:12–2010.1016/j.desal.2017.08.019 ↗
49. Long Q et al (2018) Exploration of oligomeric sodium carboxylates as novel draw solutes for forward osmosis. Chem Eng Res Des 138:77–8610.1016/j.cherd.2018.08.020 ↗
50. Tayel A, Nasr P, Sewilam H (2019) Forward osmosis desalination using pectin-coated magnetic nanoparticles as a draw solution. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21:1617–162810.1007/s10098-019-01738-5 ↗
51. Shokrollahzadeh S, Bide Y, Gholami S (2020) Enhancing forward osmosis performance via an oligomeric deep eutectic solvent as a draw solute. Desalination 491:11447310.1016/j.desal.2020.114473 ↗
52. Bagheri B, Karimi-Jashni A, Zerafat MM (2021) Application of molasses as draw solution in forward osmosis desalination for fertigation purposes. Environ Technol 42(5):764–77410.1080/09593330.2019.1645215 ↗
53. Zewail T et al (2022) Performance of novel draw solutions in brackish water desalination using forward osmosis. J Appl Sci Eng 26(6):811–818
54. Kamel AH et al (2023) Novel sodium and potassium carbon quantum dots as forward osmosis draw solutes: synthesis, characterization and performance testing. Desalination 567:11695610.1016/j.desal.2023.116956 ↗
55. Wang J et al (2020) Recent developments and future challenges of hydrogels as draw solutes in forward osmosis process. Water 12(3):69210.3390/w12030692 ↗
56. Zhang K et al (2023) A novel solution-diffusion-Flory-Rehner model to predict flux behavior during forward osmosis with thermo-responsive hydrogel as draw agent. J Membr Sci 675:12155310.1016/j.memsci.2023.121553 ↗
57. Okay O (2010) General properties of hydrogels. Hydrogel sensors and actuators: Eng Technol 1–1410.1007/978-3-540-75645-3_1 ↗
58. Dreiss CA (2020) Hydrogel design strategies for drug delivery. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 48:1–1710.1016/j.cocis.2020.02.001 ↗
59. Garg S, Garg A, Vishwavidyalaya R (2016) Hydrogel: classification, properties, preparation and technical features. Asian J Biomater Res 2(6):163–170
60. Bustamante-Torres M et al (2021) Hydrogels classification according to the physical or chemical interactions and as stimuli-sensitive materials. Gels 7(4):18210.3390/gels7040182 ↗
61. Wang H, Wei J, Simon GP (2014) Response to osmotic pressure versus swelling pressure: comment on “bifunctional polymer hydrogel layers as forward osmosis draw agents for continuous production of fresh water using solar energy.” Environ Sci Technol 48(7):4214–421510.1021/es5011016 ↗
62. Li D et al (2013) Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance. Water Res 47(1):209–21510.1016/j.watres.2012.09.049 ↗
63. Cai Y (2016) A critical review on draw solutes development for forward osmosis. Desalination 391:16–2910.1016/j.desal.2016.03.021 ↗
64. Li D, Wang H (2013) Smart draw agents for emerging forward osmosis application. J Mater Chem A 1(45):14049–1406010.1039/c3ta12559a ↗
65. Xu Y et al (2022) A comprehensive review on forward osmosis water treatment: recent advances and prospects of membranes and draw solutes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(13):821510.3390/ijerph19138215 ↗
66. She Q et al (2012) Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Res 46(7):2478–248610.1016/j.watres.2012.02.024 ↗
67. Luo H et al (2014) A review on the recovery methods of draw solutes in forward osmosis. J Water Process Eng 4:212–22310.1016/j.jwpe.2014.10.006 ↗
68. Lim WJ, Ooi BS (2022) Applications of responsive hydrogel to enhance the water recovery via membrane distillation and forward osmosis: a review. J Water Process Eng 47:10282810.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102828 ↗
69. Abdelrasoul A et al (2018) Fouling in forward osmosis membranes: mechanisms, control, and challenges. Osmotically Driven Membrane Processes: Approach, Development and Current Status; IntechOpen Limited: London, pp 151–17710.5772/intechopen.72644 ↗
70. Akther N et al (2015) Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: a review. Chem Eng J 281:502–52210.1016/j.cej.2015.05.080 ↗
71. Fayer A (2023) Perspective chapter: hydrogel draw agent desalination systems–outlook, in Desalination-Ecological Consequences IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.110666 ↗
72. Hashemifard SA et al (2025) Challenges of forward osmosis desalination processes using hydrogels as draw agents. J Membr Sci 714:12340810.1016/j.memsci.2024.123408 ↗
73. Kowalski G, Witczak M, Kuterasiński Ł (2024) Structure effects on swelling properties of hydrogels based on sodium alginate and acrylic polymers. Molecules 29(9):193710.3390/molecules29091937 ↗
74. Sun Y et al (2024) Water recovery from wastewater by hydrogels. Environ Sci Technol Lett 11(4):357–36310.1021/acs.estlett.4c00075 ↗
75. Reddy AS, Wanjari VP, Singh SP (2023) Design, synthesis, and application of thermally responsive draw solutes for sustainable forward osmosis desalination: a review. Chemosphere 317:13779010.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137790 ↗
76. Li D et al (2011) Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem Commun 47(6):1710–171210.1039/c0cc04701e ↗
77. Dharmasiri MB, Mudiyanselage TK (2021) Thermo-responsive poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) hydrogel with increased response rate. Polym Bull 78:3183–319810.1007/s00289-020-03270-9 ↗
78. Li D et al (2011) Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering. Soft Matter 7(21):10048–1005610.1039/c1sm06043k ↗
79. Ao X et al (2012) Dye-incorporated polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis desalination. In: Proceedings of CHEMECA 2012
80. Cai Y et al (2013) Towards temperature driven forward osmosis desalination using semi-IPN hydrogels as reversible draw agents. Water Res 47(11):3773–378110.1016/j.watres.2013.04.034 ↗
81. Zeng Y et al (2013) Significantly enhanced water flux in forward osmosis desalination with polymer-graphene composite hydrogels as a draw agent. RSC Adv 3(3):887–89410.1039/C2RA22173J ↗
82. Luo H et al (2014) Performance of strong ionic hydrogels based on 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate as draw agents for forward osmosis. J Environ Eng 140(12):0401404410.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000875 ↗
83. Cai Y et al (2015) Exploration of using thermally responsive polyionic liquid hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis. RSC Adv 5(118):97143–9715010.1039/C5RA19018E ↗
84. Fan X et al (2016) Forward-osmosis desalination with poly (ionic liquid) hydrogels as smart draw agents. Adv Mater 28(21):4156–416110.1002/adma.201600205 ↗
85. Hartanto Y et al (2015) Functionalized thermo-responsive microgels for high performance forward osmosis desalination. Water Res 70:385–39310.1016/j.watres.2014.12.023 ↗
86. Hartanto Y et al (2016) Thermoresponsive acidic microgels as functional draw agents for forward osmosis desalination. Environ Sci Technol 50(8):4221–422810.1021/acs.est.5b04123 ↗
87. Hartanto Y et al (2016) Thermoresponsive cationic copolymer microgels as high performance draw agents in forward osmosis desalination. J Membr Sci 518:273–28110.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.018 ↗
88. Nakka R, Mungray AA (2016) Biodegradable and biocompatible temperature sensitive triblock copolymer hydrogels as draw agents for forward osmosis. Sep Purif Technol 168:83–9210.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.021 ↗
89. Wei J et al (2016) Hydrogel-polyurethane interpenetrating network material as an advanced draw agent for forward osmosis process. Water Res 96:292–29810.1016/j.watres.2016.03.072 ↗
90. Ou R et al (2016) Microfiber-polymer hydrogel monolith as forward osmosis draw agent. J Membr Sci 510:426–43610.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.031 ↗
91. Tu KL, Simon GP, Wang H (2017) Fast-responsive monolithic hydrogels as draw agent for forward osmosis membrane process. Sep Sci Technol 52(16):2583–259010.1080/01496395.2017.1310237 ↗
92. Hsu C-H et al (2019) Enhanced forward osmosis desalination with a hybrid ionic liquid/hydrogel thermoresponsive draw agent system. ACS Omega 4(2):4296–430310.1021/acsomega.8b02827 ↗
93. Hartanto Y et al (2019) Non-ionic copolymer microgels as high-performance draw materials for forward osmosis desalination. J Membr Sci 572:480–48810.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.042 ↗
94. Zeng J et al (2019) Multi-layer temperature-responsive hydrogel for forward-osmosis desalination with high permeable flux and fast water release. Desalination 459:105–11310.1016/j.desal.2019.02.002 ↗
95. Zhang K et al (2020) Construction of ionic thermo-responsive PNIPAM/γ-PGA/PEG hydrogel as a draw agent for enhanced forward-osmosis desalination. Desalination 495:11466710.1016/j.desal.2020.114667 ↗
96. Borsalani A et al (2020) Forward osmosis by introducing temperature responsive poly (propylene fumarate-co-N-vinyl pyrrolidinone) hydrogel as a new draw solute. Desalin Water Treat 201:1–1210.5004/dwt.2020.25669 ↗
97. Pan Z et al (2021) Sewage sludge ash-based thermo-responsive hydrogel as a novel draw agent towards high performance of water flux and recovery for forward-osmosis. Desalination 512:11514710.1016/j.desal.2021.115147 ↗
98. Bendoy AP et al (2022) Thermo-responsive hydrogel with deep eutectic mixture co-monomer as drawing agent for forward osmosis. Desalination 542:11606710.1016/j.desal.2022.116067 ↗
99. Gao Y et al (2022) Synthesis of PNIPAAm-g-P4VP microgel as draw agent in forward osmosis by RAFT polymerization and reverse suspension polymerization to improve water flux. Molecules 27(10):321410.3390/molecules27103214 ↗
100. Okay O, Durmaz S (2002) Charge density dependence of elastic modulus of strong polyelectrolyte hydrogels. Polymer 43(4):1215–122110.1016/S0032-3861(01)00723-6 ↗