Novel PEEK/nHA composites fabricated by hot-pressing of 3D braided PEEK matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
Integration of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) into polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been recognized as an effective approach to improve osseointegration of PEEK-based devices. In this work, we report a novel method based on 3D braiding-self retention-hot pressing to yield a bioactive PEEK/nHA composite with superior mechanical properties. The better apatite formation ability and higher MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion and proliferation for the braided PEEK composite reinforced with 6.5 wt% and 14.5 wt% nHA displayed than the unfilled PEEK matrix, mainly ascribed to the incorporation of nHA. Meanwhile, the elastic modulus, hardness, and bending strength of binary composites increased from 4.3 to 8.3 GPa, 0.23 to 0.34 GPa, and 138.86 to 155.32 MPa correspondingly. Compared with the fracture toughness of pure PEEK matrix, that of 6.5 wt% nHA/PEEK composites had a 54.9% increase, whereas that of 14.5 wt% nHA/PEEK composites showed a 23.6% decrease, which was mainly attributed to the interfacial properties between HA and PEEK as well as braid structure of PEEK filaments. These findings exhibited both good mechanical properties and bioactivity of the braided PEEK/nHA composites. Therefore, it is proposed that the 3D braiding-self retention-hot pressing technique is a promising approach for customized PEEK-based implants.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdullah MR, Goharian A, Abdul Kadir MR, Wahit MU (2015) Biomechanical and bioactivity concepts of polyetheretherketone composites for use in orthopedic implants-a review. J Biomed Mater Res A 103(11):3689–370210.1002/jbm.a.35480 ↗
2. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28(32):4845–486910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
3. Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F (2009) Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg 62(6):653–65510.1097/SAP.0b013e318184abc7 ↗
4. Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Askari E, Flores P, Souza JCM, Gomes JR, Silva FS, Henriques B (2016) Effects of poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK) veneer thickness on the reciprocating friction and wear behavior of PEEK/Ti6Al4V structures in artificial saliva. Wear 368-369:84–9110.1016/j.wear.2016.09.009 ↗
5. Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Henriques B, Silva FS, Souza JCM, Gomes JR (2016) Tribocorrosion behavior of veneering biomedical PEEK to Ti6Al4V structures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 54:123–13010.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.010 ↗
6. Xu A, Liu X, Gao X, Deng F, Deng Y, Wei S (2015) Enhancement of osteogenesis on micro/nano-topographical carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite biocomposite. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 48:592–59810.1016/j.msec.2014.12.061 ↗
7. Deng Y, Sun Y, Chen X, Zhu P, Wei S (2013) Biomimetic synthesis and biocompatibility evaluation of carbonated apatites template-mediated by heparin. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33(5):2905–291310.1016/j.msec.2013.03.016 ↗
8. Monich PR, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Souza JCM, Fredel MC (2016) Mechanical and biological behavior of biomedical PEEK matrix composites: a focused review. Mater Lett 185:593–59710.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.005 ↗
9. Wang L, Weng L, Song S, Sun Q (2010) Mechanical properties and microstructure of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite materials. Mater Lett 64(20):2201–220410.1016/j.matlet.2010.06.067 ↗
10. Wang L, Weng L, Song S, Zhang Z, Tian S, Ma R (2011) Characterization of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite materials. Mater Sci Eng A 528(10–11):3689–369610.1016/j.msea.2011.01.064 ↗
11. Ma R, Yu Z, Tang S, Pan Y, Wei J, Tang T (2016) Osseointegration of nanohydroxyapatite- or nano-calcium silicate-incorporated polyetheretherketone bioactive composites in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine 11:6023–603310.2147/IJN.S115286 ↗
12. Wang L, Huang FJ, Wu ZZ, Qin J, Wang CB, Xie MZ (2016) Cytocompatibility of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials with Sprague Dawley rat osteoblasts. Mater Technol 31(sup1):28–3210.1080/10667857.2016.1192371 ↗
13. Abu Bakar MS, Cheang P, Khor KA (2003) Mechanical properties of injection molded hydroxyapatite-polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:421–42510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00230-0 ↗
14. Abu Bakar MS, Cheng MHW, Tan SM, Yu SC, Liao K, Tan CT, Khor KA, Cheang P (2003) Tensile properties, tension–tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials 24(13):2245–225010.1016/S0142-9612(03)00028-0 ↗
15. Converse GL, Yue W, Roeder RK (2007) Processing and tensile properties of hydroxyapatite-whisker-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials 28(6):927–93510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.031 ↗
16. Jin YS, Bian CC, Zhang ZQ, Zhao Y, Yang L (2017) Preparation and characterization of bio-composite PEEK/nHA. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 16710.1088/1757-899X/167/1/012006 ↗
17. Bastan FE, Atiq Ur Rehman M, Avcu YY, Avcu E, Ustel F, Boccaccini AR (2018) Electrophoretic co-deposition of PEEK-hydroxyapatite composite coatings for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 169:176–18210.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.005 ↗
18. Wu GM, Hsiao WD, Kung SF (2009) Investigation of hydroxyapatite coated polyether ether ketone composites by gas plasma sprays. Surf Coat Technol 203(17–18):2755–2758
19. Oliveira TP, Silva SN, Sousa JA (2018) Flexural fatigue behavior of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) injection moldings derived from dynamic mechanical analysis. Int J Fatigue 108:1–810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.016 ↗
20. Ma R, Fang LZ, Zheng R, Song S, Weng L, Lei J (2014) Fabrication and characterization of modified-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone coating materials. Appl Surf Sci 314:341–34710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.050 ↗
21. Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, Baek HR, Jin K, Hong KS, Noh JH, Lee HK (2013) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bioactivity of hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone biocomposites created by cold spray technology. Acta Biomater 9(4):6177–618710.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.030 ↗
22. Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, Baek HR, Jin K, Noh JH (2017) Cold-spray coating of hydroxyapatite on a three-dimensional polyetheretherketone implant and its biocompatibility evaluated by in vitro and in vivo minipig model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105(3):647–65710.1002/jbm.b.33589 ↗
23. Johansson P, Barkarmo S, Hawthan M, Peruzzi N, Kjellin P, Wennerberg A (2018) Biomechanical,histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit. J Biomed Mater Res A 106(5):1440–144710.1002/jbm.a.36345 ↗
24. Ma R, Weng L, Bao X, Song S, Zhang Y (2013) In vivo biocompatibility and bioactivity of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials. J Appl Polym Sci 127(4):2581–258710.1002/app.37926 ↗
25. Pan YS, Shen QQ, Chen Y, Yu K, Pan CL, Zhang L (2014) Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Mater Technol 30(5):257–26310.1179/1753555714Y.0000000179 ↗
26. Ma R, Weng L, Fang L, Luo Z, Song S (2012) Structure and mechanical performance of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone nanocomposite materials. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 62(1):52–5610.1007/s10971-012-2682-1 ↗
27. Almasi D, Izman S, Assadian M, Ghanbari M, Abdul Kadir MR (2014) Crystalline ha coating on peek via chemical deposition. Appl Surf Sci 314:1034–104010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.074 ↗
28. Marcomini AL, Rego BT, Suman Bretas RES (2016) Improvement of the short- and long-term mechanical properties of injection-molded poly(etheretherketone) and hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 134(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4447610.1002/app.44476 ↗
29. Ma R, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang X, Fang L, Luo Z, Xue B, Ma L (2017) Mechanical properties and in vivo study of modified-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 73:429–43910.1016/j.msec.2016.12.076 ↗
30. Hughes EA, Parkes A, Williams RL, Jenkins MJ, Grover LM (2018) Formulation of a covalently bonded hydroxyapatite and poly(ether ether ketone) composite. J Tissue Eng 9:204173141881557010.1177/2041731418815570 ↗
31. Meyers MA, McKittrick J, Chen PY (2013) Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 339(6121):773–77910.1126/science.1220854 ↗
32. Ma J, Xue YZB, Liang XY, Liao CZ, Tan ZJ, Tang B (2019) Bi-directional regulatable mechanical properties of 3D braided polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Mater Sci Eng C 103:109811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.10981110.1016/j.msec.2019.109811 ↗
33. Szewczyk D, Bauer A, Holt RM (2016) A new laboratory apparatus for the measurement of seismic dispersion under deviatoric stress conditions. Geophys Prospect 64(4):789–79810.1111/1365-2478.12425 ↗
34. Brum RS, Monich PR, Berti F, Fredel MC, Porto LM, Benfatti CAM, Souza JCM (2019) On the sulphonated PEEK for implant dentistry: biological and physicochemical assessment. Mater Chem Phys 223:542–54710.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.027 ↗
35. da Cruz M, Marques J, Peñarrieta Juanito GM, Costa MM, Souza J, Magini R, Miranda G, Silva F, Mata A, Caramês J (2019) Hard and soft tissue cell behavior on PEEK, zirconia, and titanium implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.692610.11607/jomi.6926 ↗
36. Almasi D, Izman S, Sadeghi M, Iqbal N, Roozbahani F, Krishnamurithy G, Kamarul T, AbdulKadir MR (2015) In vitro evaluation of bioactivity of chemically deposited hydroxyapatite on polyether ether ketone. Int J Biomater 2015:47543510.1155/2015/475435 ↗
37. Deng Y, Liu X, Xu A, Wang L, Luo Z, Zheng Y, Deng F, Wei J, Tang Z, Wei S (2015) Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite. Int J Nanomedicine 10:1425–1447
38. Monich PR, Berti FV, Porto LM, Henriques B, Novaes de Oliveira AP, Fredel MC, Souza JCM (2017) Physicochemical and biological assessment of PEEK composites embedding natural amorphous silica fibers for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 79:354–36210.1016/j.msec.2017.05.031 ↗
39. Deng Y, Zhou P, Liu X, Wang L, Xiong X, Tang Z, Wei J, Wei S (2015) Preparation, characterization, cellular response and in vivo osseointegration of polyetheretherketone/nano-hydroxyapatite/carbon fiber ternary biocomposite. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 136:64–7310.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.001 ↗
40. Zhang YH, Tao W, Zhang Y, Tang L, Gu JW, Jiang ZH (2018) Continuous carbon fiber/crosslinkable poly(ether ether ketone) laminated composites with outstanding mechanical properties, robust solvent resistance and excellent thermal stability. Compos Sci Technol 165:148–15310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.020 ↗
41. Bonfield W, Wang M, Tanner KE (1998) Interfaces in analogue biomaterials. Acta Mater 46(7):2509–251810.1016/S1359-6454(98)80035-9 ↗
42. Carter DR, Spengler DM (1978) Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 135(135):192–217
43. Wong KL, Wong CT, Liu WC, Pan HB, Fong MK, Lam WM, Cheung WL, Tang WM, Chiu KY, Luk KD, Lu WW (2009) Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites. Biomaterials 30(23–24):3810–381710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.016 ↗
44. Biswas S, Dasgupta P, Pramanik P, Chanda A (2014) Macro and micro-indentation behavior of the cortical part of human femur. Procedia Mater Sci 5:2320–232910.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.475 ↗
45. Ma R, Weng L, Bao X, Ni Z, Song S, Cai W (2012) Characterization of in situ synthesized hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite materials. Mater Lett 71:117–11910.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.007 ↗