Modeling of Anisotropic Deformation in Superplastic Sheet Metal Stretching
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently available models describing superplastic deformation are mostly based on uniaxial tensile test data and assume isotropic behavior, thus leading to limited predictive capabilities of material deformation and failure. In this work we present a multi-axial microstructure-based constitutive model that describes the anisotropic superplastic deformation within the continuum theory of viscoplasticity with internal variables. The model accounts for microstructural evolution and employs a generalized anisotropic dynamic yield function. The anisotropic yield function can describe the evolution of the initial state of anisotropy through the evolution of unit vectors defining the direction of anisotropy during deformation. The generalized model is then reduced to the plane stress condition to simulate sheet metal stretching in superplastic blow forming using pressurized gas. Different ratios of biaxial stretching were investigated, including the case simulating the uniaxial loading condition, where the model successfully captured the uniaxial experimental data. The model is also used to develop a new forming pressure profile that accounts for anisotropy and microstructural evolution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Manufacturing and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Hamilton, C., Zbib, H., Johnson, C., and Richter, C., 1991, “Dynamic Grain Coarsening, Its Effects on Flow Localization in Superplastic Deformation,” 2nd SAMPE Symposium, Chipa, Japan, pp. 272–279.
2. Dutta, A., and Mukherjee, M., 1992, “Superplastic Forming: An Analytical Approach,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A157, pp. 9–13.10.1016/0921-5093(92)90092-F ↗
3. Carrino, L., and Guiliano, G., 1997, “Modeling of Superplastic Blow Forming,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 39, pp. 193–199.10.1016/0020-7403(96)00053-7 ↗
4. Zhang, K., Hamilton, C., Zbib, H., and Khraisheh, M., 1995, “Observation of Transient Effects in Superplastic Deformation of Pb–Sn Eutectic Alloy,” Scr. Metall. Mater., 32, pp. 919–923.10.1016/0956-716X(95)93225-S ↗
5. Khraisheh, M., Zbib, H., Hamilton, C., and Bayoumi, A., 1997, “Constitutive Modeling of Superplastic Deformation. Part I: Theory and Experiments,” Int. J. Plast., 13, pp. 143–164.10.1016/S0749-6419(97)00005-3 ↗
6. Khraisheh, M., and Abu-Farha, F., 2003, “Microstructure-Based Modeling of Anisotropic Superplastic Deformation,” Transactions of NAMRI/SME, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Vol. 31, pp. 41–46.
7. Abu-Farha, F., and Khraisheh, M., 2004, “Constitutive Modeling of Deformation-Induced Anisotropy in Superplastic Materials,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 447-448, pp. 165–170.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.447-448.165 ↗
8. Dafalias, Y.-F. , 1990, “The Plastic Spin in Viscoplasticity,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 26, pp. 149–163.10.1016/0020-7683(90)90048-Z ↗
9. Siegert, K., Ja¨ger, S., and Vulcan, M., 2003, “Pneumatic Bulging of Magnesium AZ 31 Sheet Metals at Elevated Temperatures,” CIRP Annals. Manufacturing Technology, 52, pp. 241–244.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60575-7 ↗
10. Banabic, D., Balan, T., and Comsa, D.-S., 1999, “Closed Form Solutions for Bulging Through Elliptical Dies,” SheMet’99, pp. 623–626.
11. Ding, X., Zbib, H., and Hamilton, C., 1997, “On the Stability of Bi-Axial Stretching with Application to the Optimization of Superplastic Blow-Forming,” Trans. ASME, 119, pp. 26–31.10.1115/1.2805969 ↗
12. Yang, H., and Mukhrjee, A., 1992, “An Analysis of the Superplastic Forming of a Circular Sheet Diaphragm,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 34(4), pp. 283–297.10.1016/0020-7403(92)90036-G ↗