Analysis of Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Nanoribbons With Folded Racket Shapes
Source abstract
Abstract
Folding of carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoribbons into a shape that looks like a tennis racket is considered. An elastic continuum model is utilized in two types of analysis. The first is called an “adhesion model,” in which the adjacent sides of the racket handle are assumed to be straight and bonded together with constant or no separation. The nanotube or nanoribbon is represented as an elastica. This model has been treated in the literature, but new analytical results are derived here, involving the geometry, work of adhesion, and bending and adhesion energies. Expressions are determined for (i) the length for which the total energy is the same as for the straight unstrained equilibrium configuration and (ii) for the minimum length for existence of a stable racket equilibrium shape. The second type of analysis uses the Lennard-Jones potential to model the attractive (van der Waals) and repulsive forces between the two sides of the racket. A nanoribbon is investigated, and the derivative of the interatomic potential is integrated along the length and across the width. Numerical solutions of the integro-differential equations are obtained with a new technique utilizing the finite difference method and minimization of the squares of the resulting algebraic equations. The results are presented for two cases with different flexural rigidities. The separation between the two sides of the handle decreases in the direction of the racket head (loop), and the handle experiences internal compression under the external attractive and repulsive forces. For the adhesion model, the dimensions of the head are proportional to the square root of the flexural rigidity, and this relationship is approximately satisfied in the numerical results based on the Lennard-Jones model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fellow ASME
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech,Blacksburg, VA 24061
Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics,Virginia Tech,Blacksburg, VA 24061
Mem. ASME
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Reich
2. Graphene and Graphite Nanoribbons: Morphology, Properties, Synthesis, Defects and Applications10.1016/j.nantod.2010.06.010 ↗
3. Peeling and Bond-Point Propagation in a Self-Adhered Elastica10.1093/qjmam/44.1.17 ↗
4. Buckles in Adhering Elastic Films and a Test Method for Adhesion Based on the Elastica10.1163/156856194X00816 ↗
5. Kinks, Rings, and Rackets in Filamentous Structures10.1073/pnas.1534600100 ↗
6. Metastable Intermediates in the Condensation of Semiflexible Polymers10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061904 ↗
7. Mesoscale Modeling of Mechanics of Carbon Nanotubes: Self-Assembly, Self-Folding, and Fracture10.1557/jmr.2006.0347 ↗
8. Self-Folding and Unfolding of Carbon Nanotubes10.1115/1.1857938 ↗
9. Self-Folding of Single- and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes10.1063/1.2535874 ↗
10. Meso-Origami: Folding Multilayer Graphene Sheets10.1063/1.3223783 ↗
11. Nanotechnology: Soggy Origami10.1038/462858a ↗
12. Mechanical Peeling of Free-Standing Single-Walled Carbon-Nanotube Bundles10.1002/smll.v6:3 ↗
13. Approximate Solutions for a Self-Folding Problem of Carbon Nanotubes10.1115/1.3184084 ↗
14. Geometry Controls Conformation of Graphene Sheets: Membranes, Ribbons, and Scrolls10.1021/nn100575k ↗
15. Free Folding of Suspended Graphene Sheets by Random Mechanical Stimulation10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.166805 ↗
16. Analysis of the Entanglements in Carbon Nanotube Fibers Using a Self-Folded Nanotube Model10.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.004 ↗
17. Self-Folding and Aggregation of Amyloid Nanofibrils10.1039/c0nr00840k ↗
18. Energetics, Structure, Mechanical and Vibrational Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes10.1088/0957-4484/9/3/007 ↗
19. Mechanics of Deformation of Single- and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes10.1016/j.jmps.2003.08.004 ↗
20. Collapse of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes10.1063/1.1883302 ↗
21. Transition States and Minimum Energy Pathways for the Collapse of Carbon Nanotubes10.1103/PhysRevB.73.075423 ↗
22. On the Inextensible Elastica Model for the Collapse of Nanotubes10.1177/1081286509105923 ↗
23. Van der Waals’ Elastica
24. The Design of Self-Collapsed Super-Strong Nanotube Bundles10.1016/j.jmps.2010.05.007 ↗
25. Radial Deformation and Its Related Energy Variations of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes10.1103/PhysRevB.83.134113 ↗
26. Peeling off an Elastica From a Smooth Attractive Substrate10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036611 ↗
27. On the Separation of Carbon Nanotubes10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.002 ↗
28. Theoretical Simulation of Atomic-Scale Peeling of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube From Graphite Surface10.1380/ejssnt.2006.133 ↗
29. Simulation of Nanoscale Peeling and Adhesion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube on Graphite Surface10.1380/ejssnt.2008.72 ↗
30. Peeling Force Spectroscopy: Exposing the Adhesive Nanomechanics of One-Dimensional Nanostructures10.1021/nl0728118 ↗
31. Adhesion and Peeling Forces of Carbon Nanotubes on a Substrate10.1103/PhysRevB.80.193406 ↗
32. Identification of Multiple Oscillation States of Carbon Nanotube Tipped Cantilevers Interacting With Surfaces in Dynamic Atomic Force Microscopy10.1103/PhysRevB.80.224105 ↗
33. Interfacial Energy Between Carbon Nanotubes and Polymers Measured From Nanoscale Peel Tests in the Atomic Force Microscope10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.026 ↗
34. In Situ Peeling of One-Dimensional Nanostructures Using a Dual-Probe Nanotweezer10.1063/1.3360936 ↗
35. Peeling Off Carbon Nanotubes From Rigid Substrates: An Exact Model10.1163/016942410X535000 ↗
36. Israelachvili
37. Binding Energy of Parallel Carbon Nanotubes10.1063/1.1623013 ↗
38. Remarks on Formulating an Adhesion Problem Using Euler’s Elastica10.1016/j.mechrescom.2006.06.007 ↗
39. Equilibria and Vibration of a Heavy Pinched Loop10.1016/j.jsv.2004.12.016 ↗
40. Folding of Elastica—Similarity Solutions10.1115/1.3157572 ↗
41. Wolfram
42. Role of Lattice Registry in the Full Collapse and Twist Formation of Carbon Nanotubes10.1103/PhysRevB.70.161402 ↗
43. Analysis of Lateral Orientation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube on Graphite10.1380/ejssnt.2009.48 ↗
44. Atomic and Electronic Structures of Deformed Graphite Sheets10.1143/JPSJ.67.3976 ↗
45. Zero Landau Level in Folded Graphene Nanoribbons10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.106802 ↗
46. Surface-Adsorption-Induced Bending Behaviors of Graphene Nanoribbons10.1063/1.3569589 ↗
47. Nanodroplet Activated and Guided Folding of Graphene Nanostructures10.1021/nl9019616 ↗
48. Elastic Bending Modulus of Monolayer Graphene10.1088/0022-3727/42/10/102002 ↗
49. Interplay Between Bending and Stretching in Carbon Nanoribbons10.1103/PhysRevB.81.144105 ↗
50. Scrolls and Nested Tubes in Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00050-7 ↗
51. Carbon Nanotubes, Buckyballs, Ropes, and a Universal Graphitic Potential10.1103/PhysRevB.62.13104 ↗
52. Deformation Mechanisms of Very Long Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Subject to Compressive Loading10.1115/1.1751181 ↗
53. Mesoscopic Interaction Potential for Carbon Nanotubes of Arbitrary Length and Orientation10.1021/jp906142h ↗
54. Van der Waals Adhesion of Graphene Membranes10.1063/1.3270425 ↗
55. Microscopic Determination of the Interlayer Binding Energy in Graphite10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01466-8 ↗
56. Adhesion Between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes10.1063/1.1871358 ↗
57. Ultrastrong Adhesion of Graphene Membranes10.1038/nnano.2011.123 ↗