Minimizing Defects Between Adjacent Foils in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Two types of defects normally occur in ultrasonically consolidated parts: (i) Defects that occur between mating foils in successive layers (“type 1” defects) and (ii) defects that occur within a layer between two foils laid side-by-side (“type 2” defects). While some success has been achieved in minimizing type 1 defects, type 2 defects, however, have been given very little attention. Both types of defects are undesirable and should be minimized if ultrasonically consolidated parts are to be used in structural applications. This work describes an investigation of how to minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated parts. According to our hypothesis, a foil being deposited must overlap the adjacent deposited foil by an optimum amount to ensure a defect-free joint between the two foils. Transverse tensile specimens were fabricated with various amounts of foil overlap (by changing the foil width setting) to test this hypothesis. Metallographic and fractographic studies showed a clear correlation between foil overlap, defect incidence, and tensile strength. It was found that a foil width setting of 23.81 mm helps minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated Al 3003 parts using standard foils of 23.88 mm (equivalent to 0.94 in.) nominal width.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4130
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
References (7)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimum Process Parameters for Ultrasonic Consolidation of 3003 Aluminum10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.016 ↗
2. Effect of Process Parameters on Bond Formation During Ultrasonic Consolidation of Aluminum Alloy 300310.1016/S0278-6125(07)80011-2 ↗
3. Ultrasonic Consolidation of Aluminum Tooling
4. Kong, C. Y. , 2005, “Investigation of Ultrasonic Consolidation for Embedding Active/Passive Fibers in Aluminum Matrices,” Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
5. Structurally Embedded Electrical Systems Using Ultrasonic Consolidation (UC)
6. An Experimental Determination of Optimum Processing Parameters for Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composite Made Using Ultrasonic Consolidation10.1115/1.2744431 ↗
7. Feasibility Study of 316L Stainless Steel for the Ultrasonic Consolidation Process10.1016/S1526-6125(07)70110-X ↗