journal article·1997-07-01

Dynamic Response of Epon 828/T-403 Under Multiaxial Loading at Various Temperatures

W. Chen, X. Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical response and failure behavior of Epon 828/T-403 epoxy were experimentally obtained over a strain rate range of 1.7 × 10−5 to 4.7 × 103 s−1 and a temperature range of −190 to 100°C. Compressive loads were applied in both uniaxial and multiaxial manners. A modified split Hopkinson pressure bar was employed to perform dynamic experiments, whereas an Materials Test System (MTS810) was used to conduct experiments under quasi-static loading conditions to establish the trends in strain-rate sensitivity. Multiaxial compression was achieved by installing snug-fit steel sleeves on the lateral surfaces of the cylindrical polymer specimens. The effects of temperature were studied by heating/cooling specimens to desired temperatures before mechanical loads were applied. The experimental results show that the yield strength of the polymer increases with increasing strain rate until adiabatic heating offsets the strain rate hardening. Lateral confinement significantly increases the axial yield strength. Increasing temperature reduces both yield strength and Young’s modulus.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Arruda E. M. , BoyceM. C., and JayachandranR., 1995, “Effects of Strain Rate, Temperature and Thermomechanical Coupling on the Finite Strain Deformation of Glassy Polymers,” Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 19, pp. 193–212.10.1016/0167-6636(94)00034-E ↗
2. Bhushan B. , and JahsmanW. E., 1978, “Measurement of Dynamic Material Behavior under Nearly Uniaxial Strain Conditions,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 14, pp. 739–753.10.1016/0020-7683(78)90032-X ↗
3. Chen W. , SubhashG., and RavichandranG., 1994, “Evaluation of Ceramic Specimen Geometries Used in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar,” DYMAT Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 193–210.
4. Chen W. , and RavichandranG., 1996, “An Experimental Technique for Impact Dynamic Multiaxial-Compression with Mechanical Confinement,” Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 36,2, pp. 155–158.10.1007/BF02328712 ↗
5. Follansbee, P. S., 1985, “The Hopkinson Bar,” Mechanical Testing, Metals Handbook, Vol. 8, 9th edition, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, pp. 198–217.
6. Johnson G. R. , HoegfeldtJ. M., LindholmU. S., and NagyA., 1983, “Response of Various Metals to Large Torsional Strains Over a Large Range of Strain Rates—Part 1: Ductile Metals,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 105, pp. 42–47.10.1115/1.3225617 ↗
7. Klopp R. W. , CliftonR. J., and ShawkiT. G., 1985, “Pressure-Shear Impact and the Dynamic Visco-Plastic Response of Metals,” Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 4, pp. 375–385.10.1016/0167-6636(85)90033-X ↗
8. Kolsky H. , 1949, “An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Vol. B62, pp. 676–700.10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
9. Lindholm U. S. , 1964, “Some Experiments with the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar,” Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 12, pp. 317–335.10.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-6 ↗
10. Nielsen, L. E., and Landel, R. F., 1994, Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, 2nd edition, Marcel Dekker.
11. Reedy E. D. , and GuessT. R., 1996, “Butt Joint Strength: Effect of Residual Stress and Stress Relaxation,” J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., Vol. 10, pp. 33–45.10.1163/156856196X00436 ↗
12. Togami T. C. , BakerW. E., and ForrestalM. J., 1996, “A Split Hopkinson Bar Technique to Evaluate the Performance of Accelerometers,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 63, pp. 353–356.10.1115/1.2788872 ↗