Comparative analysis of cotton covered elastomeric hybrid yarns and denim fabric properties
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent decades, consumer expectations and behavior have altered, focusing on more comfortable, well-fitting clothes. Wearing a slim-fitting garment helps to move more freely. Different elastomeric polymers are being introduced as a core constituent of the yarn to make denim fabric more comfortable during movement. The use of elastic material ensures that the material is stretchable and recoverable. The performance of several elastomeric hybrid yarns has been investigated in the first section of this study. Here, polyethylene terephthalate/polytrimethylene terephthalate (PET/PTT (T400 ® )), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT (Solotex ® )), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), and Lycra ® (elastane) were used as the core component of the core and dual core-spun yarns. After that, 3/1 Z twill denim fabrics were made with these as weft yarns, and the fabric’s performance was assessed. It is found that dual core-spun yarns were shown to have lower strength than core-spun yarns, while it had a higher elongation value. PTT/PBT dual core-spun yarn had less unevenness and hairiness than yarn made solely of elastane. PBT in the core of the weft yarns provided strong strength, dimensional change, and stiffness qualities in the fabric. In contrast, elastane in the core of the weft yarns provided good elastic performance. Yarn and fabric performance for the hybrid yarns were statistically significant at a significance level of 0.05.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Faculty, Department of Textile Engineering, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
R&D Department, Çalik Denim Textile AŞ., Yeşilyurt, Malatya, Turkey
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00003-410.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00003-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-85709-843-6.00001-910.1016/B978-0-85709-843-6.00001-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.05610.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056 ↗
4. 10.5604/12303666.119806410.5604/12303666.1198064 ↗
5. 10.1080/00405000.2018.147045110.1080/00405000.2018.1470451 ↗
6. 10.1108/IJCST-12-2018-016210.1108/IJCST-12-2018-0162 ↗
7. 10.1080/00405000.2018.153454110.1080/00405000.2018.1534541 ↗
8. Qadir B · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2014 · 9 · 23
9. 10.1177/15589250170120010310.1177/155892501701200103 ↗
10. Babaarslan O · Tekst ve Konfeksiyon · 2007 · 2 · 110
11. Mourad MM · J Am Sci · 2012 · 8 · 567
12. AL-Ansary MAR · J Am Sci · 2011 · 7 · 63
13. Baghaei B · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2010 · 35 · 298
14. Shishoo LR. · Int J Cloth Sci Technol · 2006 · 18 · 220
15. 10.1080/15440478.2020.178868710.1080/15440478.2020.1788687 ↗
16. 10.1080/00405000.2015.101631910.1080/00405000.2015.1016319 ↗
17. 10.1177/00405175920620010410.1177/004051759206200104 ↗
18. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104525410.1080/00405000.2015.1045254 ↗
19. 10.3390/polym1302026010.3390/polym13020260 ↗
20. 10.1088/1757-899X/254/9/09200110.1088/1757-899X/254/9/092001 ↗
21. Štrukelj D · Tekstilec · 2012 · 61 · 18
22. 10.1515/aut-2015-002510.1515/aut-2015-0025 ↗
23. 10.1177/004051751769398210.1177/0040517517693982 ↗
24. Babaarslan O · 2019 · 45
25. 10.5772/intechopen.8028610.5772/intechopen.80286 ↗
26. 10.1080/00405000.2019.166287610.1080/00405000.2019.1662876 ↗