Mélange fabric image retrieval based on soft similarity learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Fabric image retrieval, a special case in Content Based Image Retrieval, has high potential application value in many fields. Compared with common image retrieval, fabric image retrieval has high requirements for results. To address the actual needs of the industry for Mélange fabric retrieval, we propose a novel framework for efficient and accurate fabric retrieval. We first introduce a quantified similarity definition, soft similarity, to measure the fine-grained pairwise similarity and design a CNN for fabric image representation. An objective function, which consists of three losses: soft similarity loss for preserving the similarity, cross-entropy loss for image representation, and quantization loss for controlling the quality of hash code, is used to drive the learning of the model. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can not only achieve effective feature learning and hashing learning, but also effectively work on smaller datasets. Comparative experiments illustrate that the proposed method outperforms the compared methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Mezaris V
2. 10.1007/s10278-011-9443-510.1007/s10278-011-9443-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.04510.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0167-8655(00)00118-510.1016/S0167-8655(00)00118-5 ↗
5. Wan J · 157
6. 10.1109/34.89597210.1109/34.895972 ↗
7. 10.1109/2.41014510.1109/2.410145 ↗
8. 10.5604/01.3001.0013.290010.5604/01.3001.0013.2900 ↗
9. 10.3993/jfbim0006610.3993/jfbim00066 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751560637810.1177/0040517515606378 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.imavis.2017.12.00510.1016/j.imavis.2017.12.005 ↗
12. Zhang L · 1
13. 10.1177/004051751988181910.1177/0040517519881819 ↗
14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.289890610.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898906 ↗
15. Suciati N · 178
16. 10.1109/TIP.2020.304387710.1109/TIP.2020.3043877 ↗
17. Sivic J · 1470
18. Kuo Y-H · 65
19. Jegou H · 304
20. 10.1109/TMM.2014.230590910.1109/TMM.2014.2305909 ↗
21. Ledwich L · 2004 · 3
22. Xie B · IJ Network Security · 2018 · 20 · 609
23. Krizhevsky A · Adv Neural Inf Process Syst · 2012 · 25 · 1097
24. 10.1080/08839514.2017.137801210.1080/08839514.2017.1378012 ↗
25. 10.1108/EL-03-2019-006710.1108/EL-03-2019-0067 ↗
26. Wang X · 93
27. Cai Z · 337
28. Xing EP · Adv Neural Inf Process Syst · 2002 · 15 · 12
29. Mignon A · 2666
30. Hu J · 1875
31. 10.1145/276695910.1145/2766959 ↗
32. Chen D · 1268
33. Pinheiro PO · 8004
34. Kordopatis-Zilos G · 6351
35. Oyen D
36. 10.1109/TCYB.2016.260890610.1109/TCYB.2016.2608906 ↗
37. Tang H · 76
38. 10.1109/TIP.2018.288215510.1109/TIP.2018.2882155 ↗
39. Liu H · Comput Intell Neurosci · 2021 · 2021 · 996871610.1155/2021/9968716 ↗
40. 10.1109/TIP.2020.302543710.1109/TIP.2020.3025437 ↗
41. Zhao S · arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00648 · 2021
42. 10.1109/TIP.2021.310680510.1109/TIP.2021.3106805 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.05.01110.1016/j.patcog.2019.05.011 ↗
44. Ko B · 7255
45. 10.1109/TMM.2018.279624010.1109/TMM.2018.2796240 ↗
46. Vijaya Kumar BG · 5385
47. 10.1016/j.cviu.2017.06.00710.1016/j.cviu.2017.06.007 ↗
48. Deng J · 248
49. Simonyan K · arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 · 2014
50. He K · 770
51. Szegedy C · 1
52. Xia R
53. Li W-J · arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03855 · 2015
54. Yuan L · 3083
55. Do TT · 219
56. Yang E · 1064
57. 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.278988710.1109/TPAMI.2018.2789887 ↗