journal article·2024-01Open access

Optimization of PCB printing ink and textile substrates for enhanced e-textile performance and reliability

Shahood Uz Zaman, Aqsa Imran, Mohammad Ijaz, Abher Rasheed

Abstract

Smart and electronic textiles are rapidly advancing with technological progress. Numerous studies have explored the synthesis and application of carbon and graphene-based inks on various substrates. However, there remains a critical need to examine the parameters affecting the fabrication of carbon-based printed designs for e-textiles. This study investigates the effects of weave structure, ink type, and flow rate on the electric resistance and surface characteristics of textile fabrics used as substrates. Two fabric types, plain weave and twill weave, were used with three various types of inks including carbon, graphene-based, and textile reference inks. The best six samples from each weave type were washed and re-evaluated for electric resistance and surface properties, with plain weaves showing superior results. ANOVA statistical analysis revealed that ink type significantly impacts the electrical resistance of printed circuits. A printed patch from a reference ink sample was stitched onto a casual knitted t-shirt, demonstrating the potential for smart textile applications in embodied sensors, piezoelectric materials, and energy harvesting. These printed patches may be used in various smart and e-textile applications for various fields ranging from health, sports, leisure, etc.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Department of Clothing, School of Engineering and Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.11591/eei.v12i5.513310.11591/eei.v12i5.5133 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mejo.2017.05.01010.1016/j.mejo.2017.05.010 ↗
3. 10.1002/9783527818556.ch1310.1002/9783527818556.ch13 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10586610.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105866 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1210230010.3390/polym12102300 ↗
6. 10.3390/coatings1202026710.3390/coatings12020267 ↗
7. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.309430310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094303 ↗
8. 10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/01207110.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012071 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-019-9266-410.1007/s12221-019-9266-4 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20150733310.1002/anie.201507333 ↗
11. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.293833310.1109/JSEN.2019.2938333 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10719410.1016/j.measurement.2019.107194 ↗
13. 10.3390/s14071195710.3390/s140711957 ↗
14. 10.32098/mltj.02.2020.1910.32098/mltj.02.2020.19 ↗
15. Wu R · Small · 2019 · 15 · 1
16. 10.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.913562510.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.9135625 ↗
17. Eghan B · Eng Proc · 2024 · 52 · 3
18. 10.1002/adma.20190552710.1002/adma.201905527 ↗
19. 10.3390/fib603004610.3390/fib6030046 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-019-02951-710.1007/s10570-019-02951-7 ↗
21. 10.3390/s2001007310.3390/s20010073 ↗
22. Lugoda P · 2017
23. 10.1109/TASC.2012.223659610.1109/TASC.2012.2236596 ↗
24. 10.1109/LISAT.2013.657822210.1109/LISAT.2013.6578222 ↗
25. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.301875910.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018759 ↗
26. 10.1088/2631-8695/ab8e2410.1088/2631-8695/ab8e24 ↗
27. Voltera. Voltera V-one, https://www.voltera.io/v-one (2024, accessed 17 September 2024).
28. Shrivas G. · Textile Value Chain · 2015
29. Jagatheesan K · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2014 · 39 · 329
30. Techinstro. Carbon conductive ink, https://www.techinstro.com/carbon-conductive-ink/?srsltid=AfmBOoqRXsr0-1HHbCpEtOcI32m-NxgpD_9pC4iRMYj-Om24EU1y-xiM (2024, accessed 17 September 2024).
31. 10.35530/IT.073.01.20211810.35530/IT.073.01.202118 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12221-019-9325-x10.1007/s12221-019-9325-x ↗
33. 10.3390/s2005127210.3390/s20051272 ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1318316510.3390/polym13183165 ↗
35. Herling C. Effect of fabric structure on liquid transport, ink jet drop spreading and printing quality. 2009, pp.1689–1699.
36. Malik S, Kadian S, Kumar S. Advances in ink-jet printing technology of textiles. 2005.
37. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0337710.1021/acsomega.3c03377 ↗
38. 10.3390/s2023691010.3390/s20236910 ↗