journal article·2025-12-04Open access

Design and Validation of a Piston-Driven Syringe-Extrusion Bioprinter Using an FDM Frame

Linlin Zhou, Siheng Su

Biomimetics· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

Direct ink writing (DIW) deposits viscous, shear-responsive inks at low temperature, enabling hydrogels and cell-laden bioinks for biomedical fabrication. Access to DIW remains limited by the cost of dedicated systems and the complexity of custom motion control. Repurposing fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers lowers these barriers by using accurate motion stages, open firmware, and familiar workflows while preserving build volume. In this study, three DIW actuator designs were implemented on an FDM frame. The first used a gear-and-rail transmission that converted stepper rotation to plunger travel. The second used a direct trapezoidal-screw pusher that increased force but reduced build-space clearance. The third relocated actuation to a remote piston-driven module that decoupled force generation from the printhead. The final architecture integrates the remote piston with partitioned control, where the printer executes motion and a programmable logic controller (PLC) manages extrusion. This arrangement reduces carried mass, preserves build space, and enables precise volumetric dosing with fast response. On a standard desktop frame, the system achieved controllable deposition of an agar/alginate ink using off-the-shelf electronics and modest modifications. This approach promotes sustainable and accessible innovation by repurposing existing FDM printers with open-source hardware and modular components. The resulting platform supports biomimetic biofabrication by combining mechanical efficiency, environmental responsibility, and cost-effective design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Horvath, J. (2014). A Brief History of 3D Printing, Mastering 3D Printing.10.1007/978-1-4842-0025-4 ↗
2. Kong, B., and Zhao, Y. (2023). 3D Bioprinting for Biomedical Applications, BME Frontiers.10.34133/bmef.0010 ↗
3. Nanoscale 3D printing of hydrogels for cellular tissue engineering10.1039/C8TB00301G ↗
4. Li, V.C.F., Dunn, C.K., Zhang, Z., Deng, Y., and Qi, H.J. (2017). Direct ink write (DIW) 3D printed cellulose nanocrystal aerogel structures. Sci. Rep., 7.10.1038/s41598-017-07771-y ↗
5. Sustainable advances in SLA/DLP 3D printing materials and processes10.1039/D1GC01489G ↗
6. Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications10.1002/adhm.201701161 ↗
7. Thermal conductivity of three-dimensional multi-material core-shell filament structures obtained by material extrusion
8. Tough PEG-only hydrogels with complex 3D structure enabled by digital light processing of “all-PEG” resins10.1002/agt2.368 ↗
9. Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.019 ↗
10. Yan, X., Huang, H., Bakry, A.M., Wu, W., Liu, X., and Liu, F. (2024). Advances in enhancing the mechanical properties of biopolymer hydrogels via multi-strategic approaches. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 272.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132583 ↗
11. From rheological concepts to additive manufacturing assessment of hydrogel-based materials for advanced bioprinting applications10.1039/D5MA00019J ↗
12. Optimizing a self-healing gelatin/aldehyde-modified xanthan gum hydrogel for extrusion-based 3D printing in biomedical applications10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102208 ↗
13. Chu, H., Zhang, K., Rao, Z., Song, P., Lin, Z., Zhou, J., Yang, L., Quan, D., and Bai, Y. (2023). Harnessing decellularised extracellular matrix microgels into modular bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting with good printability and high post-printing cell viability. Biomater. Transl., 4.
14. García-García, A., Pérez-Álvarez, L., Ruiz-Rubio, L., Larrea-Sebal, A., Martin, C., and Vilas-Vilela, J.L. (2024). Extrusion-based 3D printing of photocrosslinkable chitosan inks. Gels, 10.10.3390/gels10020126 ↗
15. Vaezi, M., Zhong, G., Kalami, H., and Yang, S. (2018). Extrusion-based 3D printing technologies for 3D scaffold engineering. Functional 3D Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-08-100979-6.00010-0 ↗
16. Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0391 ↗
17. Review of low-cost 3D bioprinters: State of the market and observed future trends
18. Development of a piston-actuated 3D bio-printer with performance prediction system for the reliable printing of tubular structures10.1088/1361-6439/acf7cd ↗
19. Lee, P.E., Fudge, D.H., Ruprecht, B., and Severtsen, J.D. (2024). Using Bioprinting Technology to Develop a 3D In Vitro Liver Model.
20. Liu, K., and GLing Xiong, S. (2023, January 17–19). Development of a novel piston-actuated bio-printer for tubular structure. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, and Electrical and Automation Control (METMS 2023), Hangzhou, China.10.1117/12.2679326 ↗
21. Ning, L., Yang, B., Mohabatpour, F., Betancourt, N., Sarker, M.D., Papagerakis, P., and Chen, X. (2020). Process-induced cell damage: Pneumatic versus screw-driven bioprinting. Biofabrication, 12.10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f53 ↗
22. Garciamendez-Mijares, C.E., Guerra-Alvarez, G.E., Sánchez-Salazar, M.G., García-Rubio, A., Garcia-Martinez, G., Mertgen, A.S., Ceballos-Gonzalez, C.F., Boliver-Monsalve, E.J., Zhang, Y.S., and de Santiago, G.T. (2023). Development of an affordable extrusion 3D bioprinter equipped with a temperature-controlled printhead. Int. J. Bioprint., 9.10.36922/ijb.0244 ↗
23. Large volume syringe pump extruder for desktop 3D printers10.1016/j.ohx.2018.02.001 ↗
24. Wilson, H.M. (2025). Modification of FDM 3D Printer to a DIW Printer for Printing Soft Materials, Drexel University.
25. Boularaoui, S., Al Hussein, G., Khan, K.A., Christoforou, N., and Stefanini, C. (2020). An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability. Bioprinting, 20.10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00093 ↗
26. Wawszczak, A., Kocki, J., and Kołodyńska, D. (2024). Alginate as a Sustainable and Biodegradable Material for Medical and Environmental Applications—The Case Studies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater., 112.10.1002/jbm.b.35475 ↗
27. Development of 3D printed sodium alginate/agar-agar/cloves scaffolds for potential wound healing applications10.1016/j.matlet.2024.137357 ↗
28. Kostenko, A., Connon, C.J., and Swioklo, S. (2022). Storable cell-laden alginate based bioinks for 3D biofabrication. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10010023 ↗
29. Efficiency and running temperature of a polymer–steel spur gear pair from slip/roll ratio fundamentals10.1016/j.triboint.2016.01.052 ↗
30. The influence of thread screw parameters on the efficiency of threaded joints
31. Zhou, L. (2020). Development of Strong Hydrogel Artificial Meniscus by Injection Molding and Additive Manufacturing, California State University, Fullerton.
32. Guangzhou Qianhui Information Technology Co., Ltd. (2018). MKS Gen V1.4 Motherboard Manual, Makerbase. Available online: https://madeit.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/MKS-Gen-V1.4.pd.
33. Ji, S., and Guvendiren, M. (2017). Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 5.10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023 ↗
34. 3D printed agar/calcium alginate hydrogels with high shape fidelity and tailorable mechanical properties10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123238 ↗
35. Ultimaker (2025, November 10). Ultimaker Original+ 3D-Printer Data Sheet. Available online: https://www.3dmake.net/3d-printer/ultimaker-original/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.