journal article·2019-01Open access

The role of staple fiber length on the performance of carded, hydroentangled nonwovens produced with polypropylene fibers

Jordan Tabor, Carl Wust, Behnam Pourdeyhimi

Abstract

Carding is a common web-forming process used for staple fibers in the nonwovens industry. Staple fibers may be produced in many different lengths. However, the effect of staple fiber length on the nonwoven carding process and structure–property relationships of carded, hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics is not well understood. During this research, polypropylene fibers with lengths ranging from 2.54 to 15.24 cm were produced, carded, and bonded by hydroentangling. All fiber lengths used during this research were successfully carded. Fabrics were characterized via scanning electron microscopy analysis as well as basis weight, thickness, and solid volume fraction measurements. Fabric performance was evaluated with air permeability and burst strength testing. Data sets were statistically evaluated with one-way and two-way analysis of variance to determine whether fiber length significantly affected fabric structure and properties. In general, the fabrics’ solid volume fractions and burst strengths were not significantly affected by fiber length. However, air permeability of the samples did show significant change with fiber length.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Material Properties and Processing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Nonwovens Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

FiberVisions Corporation (An Indorama Ventures Company), Covington, GA, USA

Funding

nonwovens institute, north carolina state university

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Tabor J · J Eng Fiber Fabr 2019 · 14 · 1
2. Partridge BJ. · 1968
3. 10.1177/00405175560260030210.1177/004051755602600302 ↗
4. Vaughn EA · 1997
5. 10.1007/s00170-012-4069-410.1007/s00170-012-4069-4 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405000.2013.83457510.1080/00405000.2013.834575 ↗
7. Kametches ML. · 1991
8. Gilbert DL. · 1985
9. Elam EA. · 1990
10. Zewen D · Cotton Text Technol · 2010 · 38 · 14
11. 10.1177/00405175500200080110.1177/004051755002000801 ↗
12. 10.1080/0040500730863031610.1080/00405007308630316 ↗
13. Sengupta AK · Indian J Text Res · 1988 · 13 · 140
14. Batra SK · 2012
15. Russell SJ. · 2007
16. 10.1177/00405175030730060710.1177/004051750307300607 ↗
17. Moschler W · 1995 · 1
18. Bertram D. · INDA J · 1993 · 5 · 3
19. 10.1177/004051751245294910.1177/0040517512452949 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751142960810.1177/0040517511429608 ↗
21. 10.1002/9781118596333.ch210.1002/9781118596333.ch2 ↗
22. JMP Statistical Discovery from SAS. One-way ANOVA, http://www.jmp.com/en_us/learning-library.html (accessed 13 September 2016).
23. JMP Statistical Discovery from SAS. Two-way (factorial) ANOVA, http://www.jmp.com/en_us/learning-library.html (accessed 13 September 2016).