Using nano technology for imparting PET/C blended fabric new functional performance properties
Source abstract
Abstract
This article, discuss the effect of finishing polyester/cotton blended fabric (PET/C) with alkali and Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO 2 NPs) simultaneously. The treatment conditions such as NaOH and TiO 2 NPs concentrations, reaction temperature and duration will be investigated. The effect of addition NPs on alkaline treatment conditions will prove through weight loss and carboxylic content. The ability of PET/C fabrics for loading with NPs during alkaline treatment was investigated by using SEM, EDX, and FTIR measurements. The effect of finishing of PET/C blended fabric with the suggested method on antimicrobial activity and ultraviolet protection was investigated. The simultaneous finishing of PET/C blended fabrics with alkali and TiO 2 NPs showed excellent ultraviolet protection and high antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive ( Bacillus mycoides), Gram-negative ( Escherichia coli), and nonfilamentous fungus ( Candida albicans). The functional performance imparted to PET/C fabrics by the suggested approach are durable in repeated laundering processes, even after five Launder-Ometer washes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Protein & Manmade Fibers Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
Faculty of Education, Industerial Education Department, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Faculty of Applied Arts, Textile Dyeing, Printing and Finishing Department, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Spinning and Weaving Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Balakocy NG. · J Text Assoc · 2014 · 75 · 7
2. 10.1080/1944701610868849410.1080/19447016108688494 ↗
3. Shalaby S · Int J Appl Chem · 2014 · 10 · 77
4. 10.1186/s43141-019-0008-110.1186/s43141-019-0008-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.10190810.1016/j.bcab.2021.101908 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.enmm.2021.10055310.1016/j.enmm.2021.100553 ↗
7. Betschewa R · Melliand Textilberichte · 1989 · 70 · 599
8. Needles L · Text Chem Color · 1985 · 17 · 23
9. Shalaby SE · J Eng Fibers Fabrics · 2021 · 16 · 1
10. 10.1177/004051751769397910.1177/0040517517693979 ↗
11. Shalaby SE · J Text Assoc · 2004 · 65 · 69
12. 10.1002/app.2385110.1002/app.23851 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.3538110.1002/app.35381 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.06.01510.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.06.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.011 ↗
16. 10.1080/1024242080236094810.1080/10242420802360948 ↗
17. 10.1177/00405175530230100610.1177/004051755302301006 ↗
18. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04072.x10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04072.x ↗
19. Shalaby SE · J Text Assoc · 2007 · 68 · 31
20. Al-Balakocy NG · J Appl Sci Res · 2013 · 9 · 2767
21. 10.1177/00405175900600110610.1177/004051759006001106 ↗
22. Shet RT · Text Chem Color · 1982 · 14 · 233
23. Shalaby SE
24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.01610.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.04.00210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.04.002 ↗
26. Hashemizad S · J Biodivers Environ Sci · 2014 · 5 · 220
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.004 ↗
28. 10.1038/nrmicro302810.1038/nrmicro3028 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-017-05976-910.1038/s41598-017-05976-9 ↗