Yarn unevenness prediction using generalized regression neural network under various optimization algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Unevenness is one of the important parameters for evaluating yarn quality, but the current prediction accuracy of yarn unevenness is low. One of the important reasons is that there are few sample dataset for yarn unevenness prediction. For this problem, this paper applies generalized regression neural network to predict the unevenness of the yarn. Then, the generalized regression neural network is optimized by using particle swarm optimization, fruit fly optimization algorithm, and gray wolf optimizer, respectively. Finally, the optimized models were experimentally validated for their effectiveness. The experimental results show that the generalized regression neural network optimized by gray wolf optimizer has the best effect and the fastest optimization speed; the generalized regression neural network optimized by particle swarm optimization algorithm has the middle optimization speed; the generalized regression neural network optimized by fruit fly optimization algorithm has the worst effect and the slowest optimization speed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Funding
Education Department of Henan Province
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12221-008-0015-310.1007/s12221-008-0015-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12221-008-0034-010.1007/s12221-008-0034-0 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12221-009-0237-z10.1007/s12221-009-0237-z ↗
4. 10.1515/aut-2015-001810.1515/aut-2015-0018 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12221-012-1201-x10.1007/s12221-012-1201-x ↗
6. Wu ZG · DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (MCEE) · 2017
7. Ghanmi H · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2019 · 44 · 31
8. Singh S · J Text Apparel Technol Manage · 2019 · 11 · 1
9. Jiang H · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2021 · 16 · 1
10. Wang Y · J Inst Eng (India) Ser E · 2022 · 2022 · 1
11. 10.1109/72.9793410.1109/72.97934 ↗
12. 10.1109/TPWRD.2017.277016610.1109/TPWRD.2017.2770166 ↗
13. Cheng X · 251
14. Benabdesselam A · Model Earth Syst Environ · 2021 · 2021 · 1
15. 10.1111/jfpe.1390210.1111/jfpe.13902 ↗
16. 10.3390/su1404220610.3390/su14042206 ↗
17. Gao Z · 72
18. 10.1371/journal.pone.023844310.1371/journal.pone.0238443 ↗
19. Zhang Y · Atmos · 2021 · 12
20. 10.1007/978-981-16-7213-2_2910.1007/978-981-16-7213-2_29 ↗
21. Jia Y · 1032
22. 10.30941/CESTEMS.2018.0004710.30941/CESTEMS.2018.00047 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.12964510.1016/j.matlet.2021.129645 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10489-021-02350-110.1007/s10489-021-02350-1 ↗
25. 10.35833/MPCE.2020.00000410.35833/MPCE.2020.000004 ↗
26. Ge L · CSEE J Power Energy Syst · 2020 · 7 · 1093
27. 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.10739710.1016/j.asoc.2021.107397 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00521-015-1923-y10.1007/s00521-015-1923-y ↗
29. Wang GG · 1
30. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12293-016-0212-310.1007/s12293-016-0212-3 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00500-018-3102-410.1007/s00500-018-3102-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.future.2019.02.02810.1016/j.future.2019.02.028 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.future.2020.03.05510.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
35. 10.1002/int.2253510.1002/int.22535 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cie.2021.10740810.1016/j.cie.2021.107408 ↗