Fabric defect detection based on deep-feature and low-rank decomposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Fabric defect detection plays an important role in controlling the quality of textile production. In this article, a novel fabric defect detection algorithm is proposed based on a multi-scale convolutional neural network and low-rank decomposition model. First, multi-scale convolutional neural network, which can extract the multi-scale deep feature of the image using multiple nonlinear transformations, is adopted to improve the characterization ability of fabric images with complex textures. The effective feature extraction makes the background lie in a low-rank subspace, and a sparse defect deviates from the low-rank subspace. Then, the low-rank decomposition model is constructed to decompose the feature matrix into the low-rank part (background) and the sparse part (salient defect). Finally, the saliency maps generated by the sparse matrix are segmented based on an improved optimal threshold to locate the fabric defect regions. Experimental results indicate that the feature extracted by the multi-scale convolutional neural network is more suitable for characterizing the fabric texture than the traditional hand-crafted feature extraction methods, such as histogram of oriented gradient, local binary pattern, and Gabor. The adopted low-rank decomposition model can effectively separate the defects from the background. Moreover, the proposed method is superior to state-of-the-art methods in terms of its adaptability and detection efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s40064-016-2452-610.1186/s40064-016-2452-6 ↗
2. 10.1080/00405000.2013.83678410.1080/00405000.2013.836784 ↗
3. 10.1177/004051751452588010.1177/0040517514525880 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIP.2011.216442010.1109/TIP.2011.2164420 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-319-00065-7_2710.1007/978-3-319-00065-7_27 ↗
6. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.284105510.1109/ACCESS.2018.2841055 ↗
7. Cheng D · J Signal Image Video Proc · 2018 · 1
8. Xia D · J Text Inst · 2017 · 108 · 239
9. Jiang ZY · J Electr Design Eng · 2018 · 26 · 175
10. Wang G. · 2014
11. Zhu D · J Comput Eng Appl · 2014 · 50 · 866
12. Guan S · J Text Res · 2014 · 35 · 56
13. 10.1016/j.patcog.2004.07.00910.1016/j.patcog.2004.07.009 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00138-005-0007-x10.1007/s00138-005-0007-x ↗
15. Chunlei LI · J Shandong Univ · 2014 · 44 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.imavis.2009.03.00710.1016/j.imavis.2009.03.007 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00138-011-0403-310.1007/s00138-011-0403-3 ↗
18. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.9410.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
19. Li C · J Text Res · 2017 · 38 · 153
20. Long HX · J Meas Control Technol · 2017 · 36 · 20
21. Li G · Comput Vis Pattern Recogn · 2016 · 478
22. Lu H · J Data Acquisit Process · 2016 · 31 · 1
23. 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.152710.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
24. Abid S. · J Eng Fiber Fab · 2019 · 14 · 1
25. 10.1109/TCYB.2017.266839510.1109/TCYB.2017.2668395 ↗
26. Li G · 5455
27. Wang L · 3183
28. 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.07210.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.072 ↗
29. 10.1109/TASE.2016.252095510.1109/TASE.2016.2520955 ↗
30. 10.1145/1970392.197039510.1145/1970392.1970395 ↗
31. Yin M · 3770
32. 10.3390/rs1004051010.3390/rs10040510 ↗
33. 10.1109/MSP.2018.282656610.1109/MSP.2018.2826566 ↗
34. 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.27410.1109/TPAMI.2012.274 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.11.00110.1016/j.cosrev.2016.11.001 ↗
36. Xue Y
37. Shen X · 853
38. Peng H · 796
39. Yang C · Comput Vis Found · 2013 · 3166
40. 10.1016/j.imavis.2016.10.00810.1016/j.imavis.2016.10.008 ↗
41. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.292519610.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925196 ↗
42. Zhang D · 1
43. Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1502.03167v3.
44. He K · 1026
45. 10.1109/TASE.2017.269674810.1109/TASE.2017.2696748 ↗