Mechanics of Energy Absorbability in Plain-Woven Fabrics: An Analytical Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that flexible woven fabrics can absorb significant kinetic energy from both projectile and fragment impacts through a combination of design factors which include yarn materials, weaving architectures, yarn density ratios, as well as the projectile mass, shape and velocity. 1–3 This paper investigates the relationships between various plain-woven fabric architectures, crimp imbalance and energy absorption capacities when rigid projectile strike these fabrics through a series of analytical solutions. This was accomplished through formulations of the yarn pullout and yarn migration forces. Special attention is given to the friction forces generated between yarn families at the yarn crossover regions. It was assumed that the yarns do not fail while the projectile penetrates through the fabric. Finally, the relationships between the residual velocities of the projectile and the contact angles α, (that is, the angle of circumferential contact between crossing yarns which is related to the crimp content) were determined. The results indicated that for ballistic impacts, highly crimp-imbalanced woven fabrics perform in a manner far superior to that of equally-crimped woven fabrics. These analytical solutions resulted in the ability to parametrically study the effects of crimp contents and, in particular, crimp imbalance on the effectiveness of plain-woven fabric armors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The City College of The City University of New York, New York, New York UNITED STATES
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport, Rhode Island UNITED STATES
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. CheesemanB. A., and BogettiT. A. “Ballistic Impact into Fabric and Compliant-
2. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000214)75:7<952::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000214)75:7<952::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
3. RoylanceD., WildeA., and TocciG. “Ballistic Impact of Textile Structures,”
4. 10.1023/A:100665530158710.1023/A:1006655301587 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101792200009010.1023/A:1017922000090 ↗
6. CavallaroP., and SadeghA. “Crimp-Imbalanced Protective (CRIMP) Fabrics,”
7. 10.1016/0043-1648(92)90041-610.1016/0043-1648(92)90041-6 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:102442420022110.1023/A:1024424200221 ↗
9. DischlerL., MoyerT. T., and HensonJ. B. “Dilatant Powder Coated Fabric and Containment Articles Formed There,” U.S. Patent 5,776,839, 1998.
10. 10.1016/0020-7683(74)90050-X10.1016/0020-7683(74)90050-X ↗
11. 10.1177/00405175860560100310.1177/004051758605601003 ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/20/1/02010.1088/0022-3727/20/1/020 ↗
13. 10.1177/00405175890590030510.1177/004051758905900305 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0119196910.1007/BF01191969 ↗
15. 10.1023/A:101867452899310.1023/A:1018674528993 ↗
16. Shockey D. A. · 2001