Influence of weave architectures on the mechanical behaviour of 3D composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper studies the physical and mechanical performance of three main architectures used in 3D woven composites, focusing on their tensile, flexural, and short-beam strength properties. The primary goal of this paper was to investigate the physical and mechanical effects of three different weave architectures, Layer-to-Layer (LL), Angled Interlock (AI), and Orthogonal (ORTH), using a consistent loom set-up. This approach aims to facilitate the seamless manufacture of transitions between weave architectures within a single perform, allowing for tailored properties to meet the requirements of specific applications by evaluating each architecture in warp and weft directions. The results indicate that the AI and ORTH architectures have better tensile properties than the LL architecture in the warp direction, highlighting the importance of warp stuffers in improving tensile strength. On the other hand, the LL architecture showed superior tensile and flexural properties in the weft direction due to 11% and 17% higher directional fibre content compared to AI and ORTH. Additionally, the AI architecture exhibited improved short beam strength in the warp direction due to the angled warp binder tows. This study emphasises how the distribution of resin-rich regions and fibre architecture can influence mechanical properties, with specific architectures providing advantages in different loading conditions. Furthermore, by ensuring a consistent loom set-up across all architectures, this work presents a novel approach to manufacturing 3D woven composites, offering enhanced design flexibility and streamlined fabrication processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Research Institute, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
Artemis Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199832091980110.1177/0021998320919801 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11046310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110463 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10766210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107662 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.11510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.115 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.969.50210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.969.502 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10443-012-9268-510.1007/s10443-012-9268-5 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
8. 10.1177/152808371877229910.1177/1528083718772299 ↗
9. 10.1186/s40691-020-00240-710.1186/s40691-020-00240-7 ↗
10. Stig F. 3D-woven reinforcement in composites. Engineering Sciences. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2012.
11. 10.1177/002199830303517810.1177/0021998303035178 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.005 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10645910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106459 ↗
14. 10.1177/089270570301600120610.1177/0892705703016001206 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.013 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11329610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113296 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831668118710.1177/0021998316681187 ↗
18. 10.1186/s40759-017-0027-z10.1186/s40759-017-0027-z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.028 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.022 ↗
21. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90174-010.1016/0956-7151(94)90174-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11026710.1016/j.matdes.2021.110267 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.012 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2706510.1002/pc.27065 ↗
26. 10.1177/073168441245062610.1177/0731684412450626 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.007 ↗
28. 10.1177/002199831983944110.1177/0021998319839441 ↗
29. Dahale M Neale G Mcgarrigle C et al. Improvement of mechanical performance in 3D woven carbon/epoxy composites by modification of weave parameters. 2019;1–9. https://www.ulster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/413082/SBCS_2019_Dahale_Monali_Paper.pdf (accessed 14 October 2024).
30. Gurit. Datasheet PRIME TM 37 [Internet]. 2023 June. www.gurit.com
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.08.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.08.005 ↗
32. ASTM 3039. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials 1, December 2002.
33. ASTM D7264. Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Annual book of ASTM standards, 2007, Vol. i, pp.1–11.
34. ASTM. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates 1 2023 www.astm.org
35. Toray Industries. T700S Technical Data Sheet [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Feb 13] pp. 1–3. https://www.toraycma.com/wp-content/uploads/T700S-Data-Sheet-4.22.2025.pdf
36. 10.3390/polym1205104510.3390/polym12051045 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11402310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114023 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.006 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00108-610.1016/S0266-3538(99)00108-6 ↗
41. 10.1023/A:100440661884510.1023/A:1004406618845 ↗
42. Zhang D, Waas AM, Yen CF. Progressive damage and failure response of hybrid 3D textile composites subjected to flexural loading, part I: experimental studies. Int J Solids Struct 201; 75–76: 309–320.
43. Chavan VB, Gaikwad MU. Review on development of glass fiber/epoxy composite material and its characterizations. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res 2016; 5(6): 2224–2228.
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10975410.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109754 ↗
45. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.031 ↗