journal article·2020-01Open access

Micro-scale numerical study of fiber/matrix debonding in steel fiber composites

Baris Sabuncuoglu, Stepan V Lomov

Abstract

Fiber/matrix debonding behavior of steel fiber composites is analyzed using a parametric finite element modeling procedure and compared with conventional composites with carbon and glass fibers. Cohesive surfaces are applied to fiber–matrix interface to simulate the debonding behavior, while the interface strength properties of steel fiber are obtained with and without surface treatment. The effect of various parameters on the debonding behavior is investigated, including stress concentrations, fiber diameter, fiber shape, and fiber volume fraction, using the parametric model. The influence of stress concentrations is determined to be much lower than the debonding strength. Debonding damage is more evident in larger fibers compared to smaller ones. Earlier and sudden interface separation is observed with the polygonal steel fibers compared to the circular ones. Increase in the fiber volume ratio increases the debonding opening distance but does not affect the opening angle significantly. The results can be useful for assessing possibilities to use steel fibers to increase toughness of the composites in comparison with glass and carbon reinforcement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Funding

Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie · Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.022 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831452882610.1177/0021998314528826 ↗
5. Tsai SW. · 1992
6. 10.1115/1.138139510.1115/1.1381395 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.10.00910.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.10.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0167-6636(00)00030-210.1016/S0167-6636(00)00030-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.01.014 ↗
10. 10.2514/1.2500410.2514/1.25004 ↗
11. Mora DF
12. Naya F
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00170-410.1016/S0266-3538(96)00170-4 ↗
14. 10.1590/S1516-1439201200500014110.1590/S1516-14392012005000141 ↗
15. De Bondt S · United States Patent · 2007 · 7166174
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.00110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.06510.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.065 ↗
20. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-710.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-7 ↗
21. 10.1163/092430409X1260540669827310.1163/092430409X12605406698273 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
23. Simulia D · Abaqus version 2016 documentation USA · 2016
24. Song K, Davila CG, Rose CA. Guidelines and parameter selection for the simulation of progressive delamination, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080020385.pdf
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.07510.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.075 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10237-014-0603-710.1007/s10237-014-0603-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.08.004 ↗
28. Cai S. · 2012
29. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.017 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.06.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.06.006 ↗