Development of ecofriendly, biodegradable electrically conductive double-layer bio-hydrogel nanocomposite for sustainable medical device applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Electrotherapy devices used for pain relief and muscle recovery often face challenges because traditional electrode materials are not biodegradable, causing environmental issues and being less compatible with the body. While current conductive hydrogels show potential, they usually lack the combination of good electrical performance, biodegradability, and body-friendliness needed for sustainable medical devices. To address these challenges, this study presents a novel, eco-friendly, electrically conductive double-layer nanocomposite bio-hydrogel developed using tragacanth gum (TG) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), enhanced with carboxylated graphene (GrF) and polypyrrole (PPy). The innovative double-layer design represents a significant advancement over single-layer hydrogels, demonstrating reduced impedance and a substantial increase in conductivity (up to 4.99 × 10⁵ times) at frequencies relevant to electrotherapy applications. Specifically, the tragacanth gum/polyvinyl alcohol/carboxylated graphene@polypyrrole (TPG@PPy) bio-hydrogel exhibited a AC conductivity enhancement of up to 1.5 times compared to the tragacanth gum/polyvinyl alcohol@polypyrrole (TP@PPy) bio-hydrogel at frequency of 80 Hz. Additionally, the material’s high biodegradability, with up to 49% mass loss over 60 days in soil, confirms environmental safety. These results show that the double-layer bio-hydrogel could be a better, eco-friendly option for future electrotherapy devices, making it different from current conductive hydrogels. Graphical Abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen CB, Williamson TK, Norwood SM, Gupta A (2023) Do electrical stimulation devices reduce pain and improve function?—A comparative review. Pain Ther 12:1339–135410.1007/s40122-023-00554-6 ↗
2. Katirci Kirmaci Zİ, Adigüzel H, Göğremiş M, Kirmaci YŞ, İnanç Y, Tuncel Berktaş D (2023) The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) on pain, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled, single-blinded study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 71:10454110.1016/j.msard.2023.104541 ↗
3. McMahon B, Prabhu A, Thode HC, Singer A (2024) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus sham TENS in adult ED patients with abdominal pain: a clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med 76:7–1210.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.035 ↗
4. Wolfe D, Rosenstein B, Fortin M (2024) The effect of EMS, IFC, and TENS on patient-reported outcome measures for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pain Res 510.3389/fpain.2024.1346694 ↗
5. Liu J, Li S, Li S, Tian J, Li H, Pan Z, Lu L, Mao Y (2024) Recent advances in natural-polymer-based hydrogels for body movement and biomedical monitoring. Biosensors (Basel) 14:41510.3390/bios14090415 ↗
6. Shaikh AA, Datta P, Dastidar P, Majumder A, Das MD, Manna P, Roy S (2024) Biopolymer-based nanocomposites for application in biomedicine: a review. J Polym Eng 44:83–11610.1515/polyeng-2023-0166 ↗
7. Li Y, Shi L, Cheng Y, Wang R, Sun J (2023) Development of conductive materials and conductive networks for flexible force sensors. Chem Eng J 455:14076310.1016/j.cej.2022.140763 ↗
8. Liao Y, Ying W, Lingfeng O, Yanlan D, Zhou Jie Hu, Qian QB (2021) Conductive polyaniline enhanced decolorization of azo dyes in anaerobic wastewater treatment. ES Food & Agroforestry 6:35–42
9. Bahaar H, Reddy SG, Kumar BS, Prashanthi K, An HC (2023) Modified layered double hydroxide–PEG magneto-sensitive hydrogels with suitable ligno-alginate green polymer composite for prolonged drug delivery applications. Eng Sci 24:914
10. Zhao K, Qian C, Qi L, Li Q, Zhao C, Zhang J, Han G, Xia L, El-Bahy ZM, Gu J (2024) Modified acid polysaccharide derived from Salvia przewalskii with excellent wound healing and enhanced bioactivity. Int J Biol Macromol 263:12980310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129803 ↗
11. Zhao K, Qi L, Li Q, Wang Y, Qian C, Shi Z (2024) Self-absorbing multilayer skin-like composite with Phyllostachys nigra polysaccharides promotes wound healing. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 7:22510.1007/s42114-024-01018-x ↗
12. Borges MHR, Nagay BE, Costa RC, Souza JGS, Mathew MT, Barão VAR (2023) Recent advances of polypyrrole conducting polymer film for biomedical application: toward a viable platform for cell-microbial interactions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 314:10286010.1016/j.cis.2023.102860 ↗
13. Lyu L, Liu J, Liu H et al (2018) An overview of electrically conductive polymer nanocomposites toward electromagnetic interference shielding. Eng Sci 2:26–42
14. Lu Y, Yang G, Wang S et al (2024) Stretchable graphene–hydrogel interfaces for wearable and implantable bioelectronics. Nat Electron 7:51–6510.1038/s41928-023-01091-y ↗
15. He H, Li H, Pu A, Li W, Ban K, Xu L (2023) Hybrid assembly of polymeric nanofiber network for robust and electronically conductive hydrogels. Nat Commun 14:75910.1038/s41467-023-36438-8 ↗
16. Sidheekha MP, Shabeeba A, Rajan L, Thayyil MS, Ismail YA (2023) Conducting polymer/hydrogel hybrid free-standing electrodes for flexible supercapacitors capable of self-sensing working conditions: large-scale fabrication through facile and low-cost route. Eng Sci 23:890
17. Sood Y, Singh K, Mudila H, Lokhande PE, Singh L, Kumar D, Kumar A, Mubarak NM, Dehghani MH (2024) Insights into properties, synthesis and emerging applications of polypyrrole-based composites, and future prospective: a review. Heliyon 10(13):e3364310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33643 ↗
18. Liu B, Sun J, Zhao J, Yun X (2025) Hybrid graphene and carbon nanotube–reinforced composites: polymer, metal, and ceramic matrices. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 8:110.1007/s42114-024-01074-3 ↗
19. Hussain S, Maktedar SS (2023) Structural, functional and mechanical performance of advanced graphene-based composite hydrogels. Results Chem 10102910.1016/j.rechem.2023.101029 ↗
20. Biglari N, Serajian A (8AD) Cellulose and its derivatives in food industry. Mater Chem Horiz 1062
21. Sridevi B, Giri R (2024) Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of Moringa oleifera gum filler reinforced bio polymer composite. ES Food & Agroforestry 18:1246
22. Tanwar M, Gupta RK, Rani A (2024) Natural gums and their derivatives based hydrogels: in biomedical, environment, agriculture, and food industry. Crit Rev Biotechnol 44:275–30110.1080/07388551.2022.2157702 ↗
23. Xie Y, Gao S, Zhang D, Wang C, Chu F (2023) Bio-based polymeric materials synthesized from renewable resources: a mini-review. Resour Chem Mater 2:223–230
24. Abdi G, Jain M, Patil N, Tariq M, Choudhary S, Kumar P, Raj NS, Mohsen Ali SS, Uthappa UT (2024) Tragacanth gum-based hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Front Mater 11:129639910.3389/fmats.2024.1296399 ↗
25. Nazemi Z, Sahraro M, Janmohammadi M, Nourbakhsh MS, Savoji H (2023) A review on tragacanth gum: a promising natural polysaccharide in drug delivery and cell therapy. Int J Biol Macromol 241:12434310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124343 ↗
26. Sahu N, Gupta D, Nautiyal U (2020) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization and applications. Asian Pacific J Nurs Health Sci 3:1–1110.46811/apjnh/3.1.2 ↗
27. da Silva Jr FAG, Queiroz JC, Macedo ER, Fernandes AWC, Freire NB, da Costa MM, de Oliveira HP (2016) Antibacterial behavior of polypyrrole: the influence of morphology and additives incorporation. Mater Sci Eng, C 62:317–32210.1016/j.msec.2016.01.067 ↗
28. Yu H, Zhang P, Chen H, Yao Y, Zhao L, Zhao M, Zhu L, Sun H (2024) Porous polypyrrole with a vesicle-like structure for efficient removal of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances from water: crucial role of porosity and morphology. J Hazard Mater 462:13274810.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132748 ↗
29. Ren H, Sun R, Jin Y, Xu M, Pei Y, Wang Q, Yan M (2023) Electrochemical properties of multi-morphology polypyrrole electrode materials depended on template agents. ChemistrySelect 8:e20230215510.1002/slct.202302155 ↗
30. Xie Y, Gao S, Jian J, Shi X, Lai C, Wang C, Xu F, Chu F, Zhang D (2023) Skin-mimicking strategy to fabricate strong and highly conductive anti-freezing cellulose-based hydrogels as strain sensors. Int J Biol Macromol 227:462–47110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.079 ↗
31. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Srivastava I, Wang Z, Song H, Yu Z-Z, Koratkar N (2010) Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites. Small 6:17910.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
32. Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y 50:3210–322810.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 ↗
33. Zhang Z, Lucia L (2021) Effect of graphene nanoplatelets on hydrogel networks: towards enhancement of mechanical strength and thermal stability. Polymer (Guildf) 234:12422810.1016/j.polymer.2021.124228 ↗
34. Paul DR, Robeson LM (2008) Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 49:3187–320410.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
35. Guo X, Li J, Wang F, Zhang J, Zhang J, Shi Y, Pan L (2022) Application of conductive polymer hydrogels in flexible electronics. J Polym Sci 60:2635–266210.1002/pol.20210933 ↗
36. Li G, Li C, Li G, Yu D, Song Z, Wang H, Liu X, Liu H, Liu W (2022) Development of conductive hydrogels for fabricating flexible strain sensors. Small 18:210151810.1002/smll.202101518 ↗
37. Al-Shamery N, Benselfelt T, Lee PS (2023) Melanin and polypyrrole-coated nanocellulose hydrogel networks for environmental sensing and energy storage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:25966–2597910.1021/acsami.3c03337 ↗
38. Rehan ZA, Zahid M, Kanwal S, Nadeem N, Hafeez A, Jamil A, Zubair Z (2023) Optimization of carboxylated graphene oxide (C-GO) content in polymer matrix: synthesis, characterization, and application study. Chemosphere 310:13690010.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136900 ↗
39. Rasuli R, Mokarian Z, Karimi R, Shabanzadeh H, Abedini Y (2015) Wettability modification of graphene oxide by removal of carboxyl functional groups using non-thermal effects of microwave. Thin Solid Films 589:364–36810.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.002 ↗
40. Dai J-F, Wang G-J, Ma L, Wu C-K (2015) Surface properties of graphene: relationship to graphene-polymer composites. Rev Adv Mater Sci 40:60–71
41. Kaur T, Thirugnanam A, Pramanik K (2017) Water interaction and enhanced wettability in carboxylated graphene-based hydrogels. Mater Today Commun 12:34–4210.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.06.004 ↗
42. Gupta ND, Das S, Das NS, Banerjee D, Sarkar D, Chattopadhyay KK (2014) Improvement of adhesion and continuity of polypyrrole thin films through surface modification of hydrophobic substrates. J Appl Polym Sci 13110.1002/app.39771 ↗
43. Mahmoodian M, Pourabbas B, Mohajerzadeh S (2015) Effect of anionic dopants on thickness, morphology and electrical properties of polypyrrole ultra-thin films prepared by in situ chemical polymerization. Thin Solid Films 583:255–26310.1016/j.tsf.2015.03.043 ↗
44. Kanbua C, Rattanawongwiboon T, Ummartyotin S (2024) Development of polypyrrole (PPy) and regenerated cellulose (RC) based composite induced by gamma irradiation and its electrical conductivity. J Polym Environ: 1–1210.1007/s10924-023-03142-z ↗
45. Wang B, Liu H, Chen C, Chen T, Zhang H (2018) Polypyrrole coated membranes with tunable surface wettability for effective oil-water separation by chemical oxidation. Mater Res Express 6:03550110.1088/2053-1591/aaf359 ↗
46. Garcia-Garcia A, Muñana-González S, Lanceros-Mendez S, Ruiz-Rubio L, Alvarez LP, Vilas-Vilela JL (2024) Biodegradable natural hydrogels for tissue engineering, controlled release, and soil remediation. Polymers (Basel) 16:259910.3390/polym16182599 ↗
47. Soman R, Mangla D, Annu (2024) Bioplastics in medical devices. Biopolymers for biomedical applications, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 417–43710.1002/9781119865452.ch16 ↗
48. Silva RRA, Marques CS, Arruda TR, Teixeira SC, de Oliveira TV (2023) Biodegradation of polymers: stages, measurement, standards and prospects. Macromol 3:371–39910.3390/macromol3020023 ↗
49. Van Der Zee M (2020) Methods for evaluating the biodegradability of environmentally degradable polymers. Chapter in a book: Handbook of biodegradable polymers. Smither Rapra, Shawburry, 2020.
50. Baidurah S (2022) Methods of analyses for biodegradable polymers: a review. Polymers 14(22): 4928.10.3390/polym14224928 ↗
51. Joseph E, Tohidifar P, Sarver CT, Mackie RI, Rao CV (2022) Fundamentals of polymer biodegradation mechanisms. In: Dusselier M, Lange JP (eds) Biodegradable polymers in the circular plastics economy, 1st edn. Wiley, New York, pp 17–5810.1002/9783527827589.ch2 ↗
52. Glaser JA (2019) Biological degradation of polymers in the environment. Plastics in the Environment 1:13
53. Agafonov AV, Titov VA, Evdokimova AV, Shibaeva VD, Kraev AS, Sirotkin NA, Khlyustova AV (2023) Composites based on biodegradable polymers and layered structures. Polym Sci Ser B 65:692–69910.1134/S1560090423600195 ↗
54. Banerjee G, Johnson MI (2013) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a potential intervention for pain management in India? Indian J Pain 27:132–14110.4103/0970-5333.124590 ↗
55. Ahmed FM, Hassan SM (2021) Optical and AC electrical properties for polypyrrole and polypyrrole/graphene (ppy/gn) nanocomposites. Iraqi Journal of physics 19:72–7810.30723/ijp.v19i51.652 ↗
56. Zhang Y, Liang B, Jiang Q, Li Y, Feng Y, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Xiong X (2020) Flexible and wearable sensor based on graphene nanocomposite hydrogels. Smart Mater Struct 29:07502710.1088/1361-665X/ab89ff ↗
57. Berke B, Sós L, Bérczes V, Domján A, Porcar L, Czakkel O, László K (2017) Graphene derivatives in responsive hydrogels: effect of concentration and surface chemistry. Eur Polym J 93:717–72510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.02.046 ↗
58. Shin SR, Li Y-C, Jang HL, Khoshakhlagh P, Akbari M, Nasajpour A, Zhang YS, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2016) Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 105:255–27410.1016/j.addr.2016.03.007 ↗
59. Lee C-J, Wu H, Hu Y, Young M, Wang H, Lynch D, Xu F, Cong H, Cheng G (2018) Ionic conductivity of polyelectrolyte hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interf 10:5845–585210.1021/acsami.7b15934 ↗
60. Zheng C, Lu K, Lu Y, Zhu S, Yue Y, Xu X, Mei C, Xiao H, Wu Q, Han J (2020) A stretchable, self-healing conductive hydrogels based on nanocellulose supported graphene towards wearable monitoring of human motion. Carbohydr Polym 250:11690510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116905 ↗
61. Xia X, Weng GJ, Xiao J, Wen W (2020) Porosity-dependent percolation threshold and frequency-dependent electrical properties for highly aligned graphene-polymer nanocomposite foams. Mater Today Commun 22:10085310.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100853 ↗
62. Thomassin J-M, Jérôme C, Pardoen T, Bailly C, Huynen I, Detrembleur C (2013) Polymer/carbon based composites as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 74:211–23210.1016/j.mser.2013.06.001 ↗
63. Nyamayaro K, Hatzikiriakos SG, Mehrkhodavandi P (2023) Utilizing cellulose-based conducting hydrogels in iontronics. RSC Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3su00139c10.1039/d3su00139c ↗
64. Chalmers E, Lee H, Zhu C, Liu X (2019) Increasing the conductivity and adhesion of polypyrrole hydrogels with electropolymerized polydopamine. Chem Mater 32:234–24410.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03655 ↗