A highly sustainable pineapple/organic cotton blended yarn as an alternative to conventional cotton textiles
Source abstract
Abstract
The demand for sustainable materials is increasing in the textile industry. This study examines the mechanical and comfort properties of blended yarns and fabrics composed of organic cotton and pineapple leaf fiber (PALF) in various blend ratios. Blends were prepared with organic cotton/PALF ratios of 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30, with yarn counts of 10 and 16 Ne, and twist multipliers of 4.3 and 4.8. Key parameters, including tensile strength, elongation, tear strength, stiffness, abrasion resistance, air permeability, and moisture management of the fabric, were assessed to determine the feasibility of these blends for textile applications. The results revealed that higher PALF content enhanced the tensile strength of the yarn, with the highest breaking force observed at 856.80 cN for the 70/30 blend with a 4.8 twist multiplier. Additionally, fabrics with a higher percentage of PALF exhibited higher air permeability and moisture management, achieving maximum moisture management of 0.75, making them suitable for applications where breathability and moisture control are required. However, higher PALF content also led to reduced abrasion resistance, with cycles ranging between 16,000 and 18,000, slightly lower than those of higher organic cotton content blends. These findings highlighted the potential of organic cotton/PALF blended fabric, especially in a 70/30 ratio, as a viable, sustainable alternative to conventional cotton textiles in applications with enhanced comfort and mechanical performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering & Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Funding
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Nabuurs G, Mrabet R, Abu Hatab A, et al. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Mitigation of Climate Change, Chapter 7: Agriculture, Forestry and other land uses. Cambridge University Press, 2022.
2. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Climate change. Cambridge University Press; 1995, p.4.
3. Dissanayake T Lokupitiya E. Analysis of CO2 emissions by selected Sri Lankan apparel industry factories across economic shifts Preprint (2019-2022). 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4695059/v110.21203/rs.3.rs-4695059/v1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15364510.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10527710.1016/j.jece.2021.105277 ↗
6. 10.1515/reveh-2018-001310.1515/reveh-2018-0013 ↗
7. 10.3390/su1509767010.3390/su15097670 ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-824543-9.00022-010.1016/B978-0-12-824543-9.00022-0 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2796810.1002/pc.27968 ↗
10. 10.15376/biores.19.4.8459-847810.15376/biores.19.4.8459-8478 ↗
11. 10.1017/S174217052000035610.1017/S1742170520000356 ↗
12. Mageshwaran V, Satankar V, Shukla S, et al. Current status of organic cotton production. Indian Farming 2019; 69: 09–14.
13. 10.1017/S174217051100020210.1017/S1742170511000202 ↗
14. 10.1177/0892705723120000810.1177/08927057231200008 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11356-021-15890-310.1007/s11356-021-15890-3 ↗
16. 10.1007/978-981-15-1416-610.1007/978-981-15-1416-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12226710.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122267 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1422486410.3390/polym14224864 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-981-15-1416-6_610.1007/978-981-15-1416-6_6 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12221-018-8522-310.1007/s12221-018-8522-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00166-110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00166-1 ↗
22. 10.1080/15440478.2021.199348710.1080/15440478.2021.1993487 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.2849610.1002/app.28496 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.16010.1016/j.procir.2014.07.160 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.09210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.092 ↗
26. 10.1080/15440478.2018.142884410.1080/15440478.2018.1428844 ↗
27. 10.1080/15440478.2017.133307110.1080/15440478.2017.1333071 ↗
28. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.306-307.151610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.306-307.1516 ↗
29. Adnan Ali M, Imran Sarwar M. Sustainable and environmental friendly fibers in textile fashion (a study of organic cotton and bamboo fibers). University of Borås/Swedish School of Textiles, 2010.
30. 10.1007/s10570-023-05465-510.1007/s10570-023-05465-5 ↗
31. 10.47495/okufbed.103703010.47495/okufbed.1037030 ↗
32. 10.2478/aut-2022-001510.2478/aut-2022-0015 ↗
33. Ahsan R, Akmal A. Effect of different blend ratios of natural fibers on yarn Properties. J Nano 2022; 3: 101–113.
34. 10.14502/tekstilec.66.202302310.14502/tekstilec.66.2023023 ↗
35. 10.3390/fib908005110.3390/fib9080051 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.2458410.1002/app.24584 ↗
37. Patil K, Sing K, Kolte P, et al. Effect of twist on yarn properties. Int J Tex Eng Proc 2017; 3(1): 19–23.
38. Khan MKR, Hasan MM, Haque AM, et al. Investigating the effects of some process parameters on the quality of coarse compact yarn produced from carded roving. J Text Eng Fash Technol 2020; 6: 251–255.
39. 10.1007/s12221-013-1172-610.1007/s12221-013-1172-6 ↗
40. 10.1080/00405000.2015.105412410.1080/00405000.2015.1054124 ↗