journal article·2021-01Open access

Susceptibility of strain-hardening cementitious composite to curing conditions as a retrofitting material for RC beams

Mohammad Iqbal Khan, Galal Fares, Yassir Mohammed Abbas, Wasim Abbass, Sardar Umer Sial

Abstract

Strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) have recently been developed as repair materials for the improvement of crack control and strength of flexural members. This work focuses on strengthening and flexural enhancement using SHCC layer in tensile regions of flexural members under three different curing conditions. The curing conditions simulate the effect of different environmental conditions prevailing in the central and coastal regions of the Arabian Peninsula on the properties of SHCC as a retrofitting material. In this investigation, beams with SHCC layer were compared to control beams. The beams with SHCC layer of 50-mm thickness were cast. The results revealed that the flexural behavior and the load-carrying capacity of the normal concrete beam specimens under hot and dry environmental conditions were significantly reduced, lowering the ductility of the section. However, compressive strength is comparatively unaffected. Similarly, the hot curing conditions have also led to a notable reduction in the loading capacity of the beam with SHCC layer with a slight effect on its stiffness. On the other hand, steam-curing conditions have shown improvement in load-carrying capacity and a reduction in section ductility of the beam with SHCC layer. It was found that the structural unit retrofitted with SHCC layer was a curing-regime dependent as the tensile and strain-hardening properties of SHCC are highly sensitive to the alteration in the cement hydration process. A normal curing regime was found effective and satisfying the practical, cost, and performance requirements. Accordingly, a normal curing regime could be implemented to retrofit reinforced concrete (RC) beams with SHCC layers as recommended in the study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Professor of Structural Engineering, College of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil, Architecture, Environmental and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA

Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Funding

king saud university

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Cosgun T. · J Eng Fibers Fabr · 2016 · 11
2. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.08.01910.1016/j.jobe.2018.08.019 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10078510.1016/j.jobe.2019.100785 ↗
4. Mazzolani FM · 2010
5. 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00082-X10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00082-X ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(375)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(375) ↗
7. American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). 2019 Bridge report, https://artbabridgereport.org/reports/2019-ARTBA-Bridge-Report.pdf (accessed 2 August 2020).
8. McLinn J. Major bridge collapses in the US, and around the world. IEEE Reliability Society 2009 Annual Technology Report, 2009, pp.2–6.
9. 10.3390/polym705096310.3390/polym7050963 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.08710.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.087 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10695210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106952 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.032 ↗
13. 10.1260/2040-2317.5.1.110.1260/2040-2317.5.1.1 ↗
14. Hawileh R · 2017
15. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.04210.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.042 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.087 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10956110.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109561 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.08910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.089 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.02.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.02.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.069 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000203910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002039 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.080 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.13210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.132 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00117-410.1016/S0013-7944(99)00117-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00695-010.1016/S0008-8846(01)00695-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.069 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00200-310.1016/S0008-8846(00)00200-3 ↗
32. 10.1155/2014/289213.10.1155/2014/289213. ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000163610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001636 ↗
34. Esmaeeli E
35. Imjai T · Case Stud Constr Mater · 2020 · 13
36. 10.1016/j.aej.2015.07.01210.1016/j.aej.2015.07.012 ↗
37. Bakis CE, Ganjehlou A, Kachlakev DI, et al. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. Reported by ACI Committee 440(2002), 2002.
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000183210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001832 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.01710.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.017 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.020 ↗
41. Hamad BS · ACI Mater J · 2006 · 103 · 48
42. Satheesan P · Int J Eng Res Technol · 2015 · 3 · 1
43. 10.1590/S1517-7076201300040001810.1590/S1517-70762013000400018 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00026-710.1016/S0958-9465(97)00026-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.020 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.04910.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.049 ↗