Spray and foam application of chemical binders to pulp fiber airlaids
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulp fiber airlaid nonwovens were bonded with three binder formulations in a spray and foam process. The binders were: a commercial acrylic dispersion binder, a commercial bio-containing acrylic binder; and a citric acid-carboxymethyl cellulose mixture (CACMC) (1:1 by-weight). The binder solutions were applied at same concentrations onto A4-size airlaid sheets (80 gsm) under a vacuum with 2-sided spraying and 1-sided foam coating. The sheet structure, dry and wet tensile properties, and total absorption capacity were compared. The foam application densified and bulk bonded the sheets, whereas the spray application induced surface bonding. These factors fundamentally influenced the measured sheet properties. The dry tensile strength was linearly correlated with the relatively low binder dosages. The CACMC binder exposed the differences in the binder application processes well, and lead to strong sheets with small elongation and highly application method-dependent absorption capacity compared to acrylic binders.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Sustainable Products and Materials, Tampere, Finland
Funding
European Regional Development Fund
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Brydon AG · 2006 · 16
2. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.02.00610.1016/j.ces.2016.02.006 ↗
3. 10.3183/npprj-2000-15-05-p554-56310.3183/npprj-2000-15-05-p554-563 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1478-4408.1986.tb01053.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.1986.tb01053.x ↗
5. Unger J. · Chemiefasern/Textilindustrie · 1992 · 42 · 576
6. TRI. Foam applications on textiles, https://www.cottonworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Foam-Applications_Finishing.pdf (2011, accessed July 2021).
7. 10.1177/15280837900190040610.1177/152808379001900406 ↗
8. Jarvis CW · 175
9. Gregorian RS. · Text Chem Color · 1987 · 19 · 13
10. 10.1177/1558925099OS-80021710.1177/1558925099OS-800217 ↗
11. Watzl A. · Text Asia · 2007 · 35 · 27
12. Watzl A. · Asian Text J · 2007 · 16 · 45
13. Boguslavsky L · 10
14. 10.1177/152808371351808710.1177/1528083713518087 ↗
15. 10.1177/004051751988412110.1177/0040517519884121 ↗
16. Russell SJ · 2006
17. 10.3390/polym1308134510.3390/polym13081345 ↗
18. Lee SH · Polymers · 2020 · 12
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.002 ↗
20. 10.1177/00405175970670050510.1177/004051759706700505 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0201510.1021/acsomega.8b02015 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.physb.2011.07.05010.1016/j.physb.2011.07.050 ↗
23. Stock SR. · 2009
24. 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01689-010.1016/S0168-583X(02)01689-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(88)90404-310.1016/0021-9797(88)90404-3 ↗
26. Evans F · 2003
27. Hoyle AG. · 650
28. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.001 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.03.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.03.033 ↗
30. EAM. The airlaid manufacturing process, http://www.eam-corp.com/resources/The%20Airlaid%20Manufacturing%20Process.pdf (2003, accessed June 2021).