journal article·2023-10

High thermal storage polyurethane composite embedded with microencapsulated phase change materials and analysis of its unsteady heat transfer

Hui Wang, Jia Dang, Miaozi Zheng, Yihui Yuan, Tao Liu, Ning Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phase Change Materials Research · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang JB, Wang ZY, Liu S, Zhang WG, Yu J, Sun BJ (2019) Prediction of hydrate deposition in pipelines to improve gas transportation efficiency and safety. Appl Energy 253:113521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11352110.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113521 ↗
2. Mahmood N, Wang ZH, Hassan ST (2019) Renewable energy, economic growth, human capital, and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:20619–20630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05387-510.1007/s11356-019-05387-5 ↗
3. Zhou SD, Ren ZH, Guo Y, Zhou WR, Liu Y (2023) Effect of wax on cohesive behavior of gas hydrate under high pressure. Energ Fuel 37:5303–5311. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c0437910.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c04379 ↗
4. Liu WY, Hu JQ, Li XF, Sun Z, Sun FR, Chu HY (2018) Assessment of hydrate blockage risk in long-distance natural gas transmission pipelines. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 60:256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.10.02210.1016/j.jngse.2018.10.022 ↗
5. Olajire AA (2020) Flow assurance issues in deep-water gas well testing and mitigation strategies with respect to gas hydrates deposition in flowlines—a review. J Mol Liq 318:114203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11420310.1016/j.molliq.2020.114203 ↗
6. Wang JG, Meng Y, Han BY, Liu ZX, Zhang LX, Yao HY et al (2023) Hydrate blockage in subsea oil/gas flowlines: prediction, prevention, and remediation. Chem Eng J 461:142020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14202010.1016/j.cej.2023.142020 ↗
7. Elhenawy S, Khraisheh M, Almomani F, Al-Ghouti MA, Hassan MK, Al-Muhtaseb A (2022) Towards gas hydrate-free pipelines: a comprehensive review of gas hydrate inhibition techniques. Energies 15:8551. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1522855110.3390/en15228551 ↗
8. Duan X, Shi BH, Ruan CY, Jia J P, Song SF, Liao QY et al (2022) Quantitative assessment of hydrate blockage risk in pipelines based on reliability theory. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 98:104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.10434510.1016/j.jngse.2021.104345 ↗
9. Chaudhari P, Zerpa LE, Sum AK (2018) A correlation to quantify hydrate plugging risk in oil and gas production pipelines based on hydrate transportability parameters. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 58:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.08.00810.1016/j.jngse.2018.08.008 ↗
10. Brown EP, Turner D, Grasso G, Koh CA (2020) Effect of wax/anti-agglomerant interactions on hydrate depositing systems. Fuel 264:116573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.11657310.1016/j.fuel.2019.116573 ↗
11. Wang H, An C, Duan ML, Su J (2020) Transient thermal analysis of multilayer pipeline with phase change material. Appl Therm Eng 165:114512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11451210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114512 ↗
12. Singh A, Suri A (2020) A review on gas hydrates and kinetic hydrate inhibitors based on acrylamides. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 83:103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.10353910.1016/j.jngse.2020.103539 ↗
13. Zhang GL, Li GY, Wang J, Tong H, Wang JC, Du Y et al (2022) 2D SnSe cathode catalyst featuring an efficient facet-dependent selective Li2O2 growth/decomposition for Li-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 12:2103910. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20210391010.1002/aenm.202103910 ↗
14. Zhang GL, Liu CY, Guo L, Liu RW, Miao L, Dang F (2022) Electronic "bridge” construction via Ag intercalation to diminish catalytic anisotropy for 2D tin diselenide cathode catalyst in lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 12:2200791. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220079110.1002/aenm.202200791 ↗
15. He B, Li GY, Li JJ, Wang J, Tong H, Fan YQ et al (2021) MoSe2@CNT core-shell nanostructures as grain promoters featuring a direct Li2O2 formation/decomposition catalytic capability in lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11:2003263. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200326310.1002/aenm.202003263 ↗
16. Wang Y, Yang D, Hessien MM, Du K, Ibrahim MM, Su Y et al (2022) Flexible barium titanate@polydopamine/polyvinylidene fluoride/polymethyl methacrylate nanocomposite films with high performance energy storage. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:2106–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00552-w10.1007/s42114-022-00552-w ↗
17. Li T, Wei H, Zhang Y, Wan T, Cui D, Zhao S et al (2023) Sodium alginate reinforced polyacrylamide/xanthan gum double network ionic hydrogels for stress sensing and self-powered wearable device applications. Carbohydr Polym 309:120678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12067810.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120678 ↗
18. Liu J, Chen E, Wu Y, Yang H, Huang K, Chang G et al (2022) Silver nanosheets doped polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel piezoresistive bifunctional sensor with a wide range and high resolution for human motion detection. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:1196–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00472-910.1007/s42114-022-00472-9 ↗
19. Yang S, Shi C, Qu K, Sun Z, Li H, Xu B et al (2023) Electrostatic self-assembly cellulose nanofibers/MXene/nickel chains for highly stable and efficient seawater evaporation and purification. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00540-010.1007/s42823-023-00540-0 ↗
20. Abu-Jdayil B, Mourad AH, Hittini W, Hassan M, Hameedi S (2019) Traditional, state-of-the-art and renewable thermal building insulation materials: an overview. Constr Build Mater 214:709–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.10210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.102 ↗
21. Xing ZP, Ke HJ, Wang XD, Zheng T, Qiao YJ, Chen KX et al (2020) Investigation of the thermal conductivity of resin-based lightweight composites filled with hollow glass microspheres. Polymers 12:518. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1203051810.3390/polym12030518 ↗
22. Figueredo AKM, Coelho DG, Miranda PP, de Souza Junior MB, e Melo PF, Junior CA (2023) Subsea pipelines incidents prevention: a case study in Brazil. J Loss Prev Process Ind 83:105007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.10500710.1016/j.jlp.2023.105007 ↗
23. Pragale R, Shipp DD (2017) Investigation of premature ESP failures and oil field harmonic analysis. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53:3175–3181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2016.260895810.1109/TIA.2016.2608958 ↗
24. Wang H, An C, Duan M, Su J (2020) Transient thermal analysis of multilayer pipeline with phase change material. Appl Therm Eng 165:114512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11451210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114512 ↗
25. Cao Y, Weng M, Mahmoud MHH, Elnaggar AY, Zhang L, El Azab IH et al (2022) Flame-retardant and leakage-proof phase change composites based on MXene/polyimide aerogels toward solar thermal energy harvesting. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00504-410.1007/s42114-022-00504-4 ↗
26. Hu X, Wu H, Lu X, Liu S, Qu J (2021) Improving thermal conductivity of ethylene propylene diene monomer/paraffin/expanded graphite shape-stabilized phase change materials with great thermal management potential via green steam explosion. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:478–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00300-610.1007/s42114-021-00300-6 ↗
27. Cheng H, Xing L, Zuo Y, Pan Y, Huang M, Alhadhrami A et al (2022) Constructing nickel chain/MXene networks in melamine foam towards phase change materials for thermal energy management and absorption-dominated electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:755–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00487-210.1007/s42114-022-00487-2 ↗
28. Wei D, Weng M, Mahmoud MHH, Elnaggar AY, Azab IHE, Sheng X et al (2022) Development of novel biomass hybrid aerogel supported composite phase change materials with improved light-thermal conversion and thermal energy storage capacity. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:1910–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00519-x10.1007/s42114-022-00519-x ↗
29. Zhang H, Mai J, Li S, Althakafy JT, Liu H, Alanazi AK et al (2022) Multi-functional phase change materials with anti-liquid leakage, shape memory, switchable optical transparency and thermal energy storage. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:2042–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00540-010.1007/s42114-022-00540-0 ↗
30. Xie Y, Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang S, Guo X, Wang H et al (2021) Paraffin/polyethylene/graphite composite phase change materials with enhanced thermal conductivity and leakage-proof. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 4:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00249-610.1007/s42114-021-00249-6 ↗
31. Patil JR, Mahanwar PA, Sundaramoorthy E, Mundhe GS (2023) A review of the thermal storage of phase change material, morphology, synthesis methods, characterization, and applications of microencapsulated phase change material. J Polym Eng 43:354–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2022-025410.1515/polyeng-2022-0254 ↗
32. Zhu Y, Qin Y, Wei C, Liang S, Luo X, Wang J et al (2018) Nanoencapsulated phase change materials with polymer-SiO2 hybrid shell materials: compositions, morphologies, and properties. Energy Convers Manag 164:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.04.00510.1016/j.tca.2019.04.005 ↗
33. You M, Zhang XX, Li W, Wang XC (2008) Effects of MicroPCMs on the fabrication of MicroPCMs/polyurethane composite foams. Thermochim Acta 472:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2008.03.00610.1016/j.tca.2008.03.006 ↗
34. Liao H, Liu Y, Chen R, Wang Q (2021) Preparation and characterization of polyurethane foams containing microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage and thermal regulation. Polym Int 70:619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.614510.1002/pi.6145 ↗
35. Liu WY, Li XF, Hu JQ, Wu KL, Sun FR, Sun Z et al (2019) Research on flow assurance of deepwater submarine natural gas pipelines: hydrate prediction and prevention. J Loss Prev Process Ind 61:130–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.06.00710.1016/j.jlp.2019.06.007 ↗
36. Bai Y, Bai Q (2005) Chapter 20 - Hydrates. In: Bai Y, Bai Q (eds) Subsea pipelines and risers. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 357–38210.1016/B978-008044566-3.50022-1 ↗
37. Jia Z, Wang Z, Hwang D, Wang L (2018) Prediction of the effective thermal conductivity of hollow sphere foams. ACS Appl Energy Mater 1:1146–1157. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.7b0026410.1021/acsaem.7b00264 ↗
38. Wang H, Zheng BH, Xu TH, Yuan YH, Liu T, Ma CX et al (2022) Thermal performance of natural gas hydrate wellbore with different insulation materials. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:1319–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00288-z10.1007/s42114-021-00288-z ↗
39. Alawadhi EM (2008) Thermal analysis of a pipe insulation with a phase change material: material selection and sizing. Heat Transf Eng 29:624–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145763080192246910.1080/01457630801922469 ↗
40. Parsazadeh M, Duan X (2015) Thermal insulation with latent energy storage for flow assurance in subsea pipelines. ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2015-4128510.1115/OMAE2015-41285 ↗
41. Al’ter IM, Tkachuk AP, Poiurovskaia II, Sutugina TF, Ogorodnikov MI (2013) Polyurethane denture base material “Pentalur” and modified polyurethane compositions: comparative study of mechanical properties. Stomatologiia 92:9–13
42. Zhang XX, Fan YF, Tao XM, Yick KL (2005) Crystallization and prevention of supercooling of microencapsulated n-alkanes. J Colloid Interface Sci 281:299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.04610.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.046 ↗
43. Cholakova D, Denkov N (2019) Rotator phases in alkane systems: in bulk, surface layers and micro/nano-confinements. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 269:7–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.04.00110.1016/j.cis.2019.04.001 ↗
44. Liang S, Zhu Y, Wang H, Wu T, Tian C, Wang J et al (2016) Preparation and characterization of thermoregulated rigid polyurethane foams containing nanoencapsulated phase change materials. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:2721–2730. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0454310.1021/acs.iecr.5b04543 ↗
45. Borreguero AM, Valverde JL, Peijs T, Rodríguez JF, Carmona M (2010) Characterization of rigid polyurethane foams containing microencapsulated Rubitherm RT27. Part I J Mater Sci 45:4462–4469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4529-x10.1007/s10853-010-4529-x ↗
46. Serrano A, Borreguero AM, Garrido I, Rodriguez JF, Carmona M (2016) Reducing heat loss through the building envelope by using polyurethane foams containing thermoregulating microcapsules. Appl Therm Eng 103:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.09810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.098 ↗
47. Tinti A, Tarzia A, Passaro A, Angiuli R (2014) Thermographic analysis of polyurethane foams integrated with phase change materials designed for dynamic thermal insulation in refrigerated transport. Appl Therm Eng 70:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.05.00310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.05.003 ↗
48. Hu Q, Chen Y, Hong J, Jin S, Zou G, Chen L et al (2019) A smart epoxy composite based on phase change microcapsules: preparation, microstructure, thermal and dynamic mechanical performances. Molecules 24:916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2405091610.3390/molecules24050916 ↗
49. Ma C-Q, Shi W-Z, Liu J-S, Xing J-W, Li S-S, Huang Y-Y (2021) Simultaneous phase change energy storage and thermoresponsive shape memory properties of porous poly(vinyl alcohol)/phase change microcapsule composites. Polym Int 70:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.616410.1002/pi.6164 ↗
50. Chen W, Liang X, Wang S, Gao X, Zhang Z, Fang Y (2021) Polyurethane macro-encapsulation for CH3COONa·3H2O-Na2S2O3·5H2O/melamine sponge to fabricate form-stable composite phase change material. Chem Eng J 410:128308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12830810.1016/j.cej.2020.128308 ↗
51. Qiu Y, Li GY, Zhou HM, Zhang GL, Guo L, Guo ZH et al (2023) Highly stable garnet Fe2Mo3O12 cathode boosts the lithium-air battery performance featuring a polyhedral framework and cationic vacancy concentrated surface. Adv Sci 10:2300482. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230048210.1002/advs.202300482 ↗
52. Zhou HM, Guo L, Zhang RH, Xie L, Qiu Y, Zhang GL et al (2023) Precise engineering of octahedron-induced subcrystalline CoMoO4 cathode catalyst for high-performance Li-air batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2304154. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230415410.1002/adfm.202304154 ↗
53. Guan YH, Cheng FQ, Pan ZH (2019) Superwetting polymeric three dimensional (3D) porous materials for oil/water separation: a review. Polymers-Basel 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1105080610.3390/polym11050806 ↗