Modeling desorption and adsorption kinetics of reactive red 195 in washing microenvironment
Source abstract
Abstract
The faded-on stains of cotton clothes are a common daily phenomenon. The desorption and adsorption of reactive dyes are theoretically responsible for the faded-on stains on cotton clothes in the washing microenvironment, especially when the light color cotton fabrics ( LCFs) are washed together with the cotton fabrics dyed in highly saturated color ( CFSCs). However, the effects of washing parameters on the desorption and adsorption kinetics of reactive dyes and the mitigation of faded-on stains in the washing microenvironment through washing parameter optimization are poorly understood. This study thoroughly discusses the desorption and adsorption behaviors of reactive red 195 in the washing microenvironment from the inhibition of color transfer. Firstly, CFSCs and LCFs were prepared by using reactive red 195 and cotton fabrics. Secondly, the effects of washing parameters, washing temperature, washing liquor ratio, and washing solution pH, on the dye desorption and adsorption rate were studied with the simulated washing device ( SWD), followed by the response surface analysis of washing parameters. Thirdly, the modeling of desorption and adsorption kinetics and velocity were detailed. Finally, the model of dye desorption and adsorption was validated in a drum washing machine ( DWM). The results are helpful for the design of scientific washing procedures to curb the faded-on stains of cotton clothes effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Color Science and Applications · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textile Science and Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
Wuxi Little Swan Electric Appliance Co. Ltd, Wuxi, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.11210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.112 ↗
2. Sun LX · J Text Res · 2015 · 36 · 76
3. 10.1007/s12221-022-4577-210.1007/s12221-022-4577-2 ↗
4. 10.2166/wst.2010.30710.2166/wst.2010.307 ↗
5. 10.1111/cote.1246010.1111/cote.12460 ↗
6. Rathinamoorthy R · Indian J Fibre Text · 2016 · 41 · 432
7. 10.1016/S0143-7208(98)00052-710.1016/S0143-7208(98)00052-7 ↗
8. Boardman C · Color Technol · 2000 · 30 · 63
9. Guo M · J Eng Fiber Fabr · 2020 · 15 · 1
10. Cronjé N · J Text I · 2020 · 111 · 1462
11. 10.1002/jsde.1255510.1002/jsde.12555 ↗
12. 10.1260/02636170232103948310.1260/026361702321039483 ↗
13. 10.1111/cote.1206610.1111/cote.12066 ↗
14. Guo M · Fashion Text · 2020 · 7 · 110.1186/s40691-019-0195-z ↗
15. 10.1111/cote.1225310.1111/cote.12253 ↗
16. 10.2478/aut-2019-006210.2478/aut-2019-0062 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.09310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.093 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1009103010.3390/polym10091030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11424710.1016/j.molliq.2020.114247 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.22810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.228 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.07.00810.1016/j.cjche.2015.07.008 ↗
22. 10.1177/004051751770019710.1177/0040517517700197 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0302210.1021/acs.est.9b03022 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12221-019-8244-110.1007/s12221-019-8244-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10115510.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101155 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.10410.1016/j.cej.2016.08.104 ↗
27. Zhao X · Fashion Text · 2022 · 9 · 1
28. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.10976410.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109764 ↗
29. 10.1111/bmsp.1206610.1111/bmsp.12066 ↗
30. 10.1109/TMM.2018.279426610.1109/TMM.2018.2794266 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.09110.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.091 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.13110.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.131 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.09.01010.1016/j.mbs.2016.09.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.02.04110.1016/j.desal.2010.02.041 ↗