Intelligent Techniques for Modeling the Relationships between Sensory Attributes and Instrumental Measurements of Knitted Fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
The present investigation provides a promising tool for engineering industrial products design. In fact, two soft computing approaches, namely artificial neural network (ANN) and fuzzy inference system (FIS), have been applied to model the relationship between sensory properties and instrumental measurements of knitted fabrics. The prediction performance of these models was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE). The obtained results show the models’ ability to predict tactile sensory attributes from the measured surface and compression properties. These neural and fuzzy models may help textile industrialists to satisfy the specific needs of consumers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Color perception and design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ENSISA, Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique Textiles (LPMT), Mulhouse CEDEX FRANCE
Textiles Research Unit of ISET, Ksar-Hellal, Monastir TUNISIA
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. ISO. · 1985
2. ISO. · 1992
3. 10.1201/978143983227110.1201/9781439832271 ↗
4. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC). · 2006 · 684
5. Kawabata S. · 1975
6. Kawabata S. · 1980
7. Kawabata S. · 1982
8. Tester D. · Textile Horizons · 1990 · 10 · 13
9. 10.1177/00405175920620050510.1177/004051759206200505 ↗
10. 10.1177/00405175930630010410.1177/004051759306300104 ↗
11. Valentin D. · 2001
12. 10.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.01310.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.013 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2010.00251.x10.1111/j.1745-4603.2010.00251.x ↗
14. BishopD.P. 1996. Fabrics: Sensory and Mechanical Properties, Textile Progress, The Textile Institute 26.10.1080/00405169608688866 ↗
15. DanzartM. 1998. Evaluations Sensorielles: Manuel Méthodologique, SSHA, 2nd Ed, 218–317.
16. Matsuo T. · Journal of the Textile Machinery Society · 1971 · 24 · 5810.4188/transjtmsj1965b.24.T58 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00312.x10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00312.x ↗
18. 10.1080/0040500840865845910.1080/00405008408658459 ↗
19. Dubois D. · Proceedings of EUFIT'97 · 1997 · 975
20. 10.1023/A:100897431449010.1023/A:1008974314490 ↗
21. 10.1080/0308107031000163357210.1080/03081070310001633572 ↗
22. 10.1177/00405175040740050110.1177/004051750407400501 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10845-009-0362-y10.1007/s10845-009-0362-y ↗
24. Abdi H. · The International Summer Program in Sensory Evaluation · 2007
25. ISO. · 1993
26. El-Ghezal S. · Proceedings Fiber Society Spring Conference · 2008 · 106
27. 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00251.x10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00251.x ↗
28. El-Ghezal JEGUIRIM S. · Journal Tekstil · 2010 · 59 · 122
29. 10.1177/00405175040740120710.1177/004051750407401207 ↗
30. AFNOR. · 1987
31. BS EN ISO 139: · 2005
32. Haykin S. · 2000
33. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
35. 10.1007/978-94-015-8702-010.1007/978-94-015-8702-0 ↗
36. 10.1177/00405175000700100110.1177/004051750007001001 ↗
37. Fukunaga K. · 1990