journal article·2015-09

Improving the Mechanical Properties of Wire-Rope Silk Scaffold by Artificial Neural Network in Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering

Elham Naghashzargar, Dariush Semnani, Saeed Karbasi

Publisher page

Abstract

Finding an appropriate model to assess and evaluate mechanical properties in tissue engineered scaffolds is a challenging issue. In this research, a structurally based model was applied to analyze the mechanics of engineered tendon and ligament. Major attempts were made to find the optimum mechanical properties of silk wire-rope scaffold by using the back propagation artificial neural network (ANN) method. Different samples of wire-rope scaffolds were fabricated according to Taguchi experimental design. The number of filaments and twist in each layer of the four layered wire-rope silk yarn were considered as the input parameters in the model. The output parameters included the mechanical properties which consisted of UTS, elongation at break, and stiffness. Finally, sensitivity analysis on input data showed that the number of filaments and the number of twists in the fourth layer are less important than other input parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Tendon Structure and Treatment · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Isfahan IRAN

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Isfahan IRAN

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Rodrigues M T · J Tissue Eng Regen Med · 2012
2. 10.1007/s00264-007-0395-910.1007/s00264-007-0395-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.040 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00510.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-0-12-370869-4.00014-810.1016/B978-0-12-370869-4.00014-8 ↗
7. 10.1089/10763270175333764510.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.diff.2009.11.00110.1016/j.diff.2009.11.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.00910.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00156-410.1016/S0142-9612(02)00156-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.026 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.b.3167810.1002/jbm.b.31678 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.04.02110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.04.021 ↗
17. Gohl
18. 10.1177/03635465910190030310.1177/036354659101900303 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.3325210.1002/app.33252 ↗
20. Fausett L · 1994
21. Babu B V · Vol · 2006 · 30 · 989
22. Haghighat E · Fibers and Textiles in Eastern Europe · 2012 · 20 · 33
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.00110.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.001 ↗
24. 10.1080/00405000.2013.83590410.1080/00405000.2013.835904 ↗