journal article·2026-07-08

A modified Drucker-Prager Cap model for densification behavior of polymer bonded explosives powders

Junpeng Shan, Wenhua Wang, Xiaoyan Zhu, Xinran Zheng, Wenxu Sun, Ming Li, Wei Tang, Qianqian Wen

Publisher page

Abstract

The densification behavior of polymer bonded explosives (PBX) powders during compaction is critical for manufacturing highly reliable PBX. The modified Drucker-Prager Cap (DPC) model is widely employed to characterize the mechanical response during powder compaction. In this work, the densification behavior of HMX-based and TATB-based PBX powders was investigated. The density-dependent elastic and plastic material parameters of the modified DPC model for PBX powders were systematically calibrated through uniaxial die compaction, Brazilian disk, uniaxial compression and radial stress calibration tests. Results from uniaxial die compaction tests and finite element simulations based on the modified DPC model show excellent agreement, demonstrating that the modified DPC model can accurately characterize the compaction behavior of PBX powders and validating the calibrated material parameters. Differences in material parameters between the two PBX powders and other powders were analyzed, and the underlying physical mechanisms were elucidated. The modified DPC model was further applied to investigate non-uniform stress and density distributions during uniaxial die compaction, and to predict the geometry and density distribution of large-scale PBX components after compaction. This study demonstrates that the density-dependent modified DPC model accurately characterizes the mechanical response of PBX powders during compaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

China Academy of Engineering Physics

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS. 2012. Abaqus 6.12 theory manual. ABAQUS Inc.
2. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.02.00510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.02.005 ↗
3. 10.11943/CJEM201825610.11943/CJEM2018256 ↗
4. 10.1002/mawe.20170004810.1002/mawe.201700048 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.11757710.1016/j.powtec.2022.117577 ↗
6. Brocks W. 2005. Cohesive strength and separation energy as characteristic parameters of fracture toughness and their relation to micromechanics. Struct Durab Health Monit. 1(4):233–243.
7. 10.1115/IMECE2016-6823510.1115/IMECE2016-68235 ↗
8. 10.1002/nag.68810.1002/nag.688 ↗
9. 10.1002/nag.225310.1002/nag.2253 ↗
10. 10.1007/s40571-014-0004-910.1007/s40571-014-0004-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.00310.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.003 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11831-020-09468-410.1007/s11831-020-09468-4 ↗
13. 10.1002/jps.2011010.1002/jps.20110 ↗
14. 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2012.11.00510.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2012.11.005 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1222366110.3390/ma12223661 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0733210.1038/srep07332 ↗
17. 10.1023/A:101318180454010.1023/A:1013181804540 ↗
18. 10.1080/71610057210.1080/716100572 ↗
19. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1312219410.3390/pharmaceutics13122194 ↗
20. 10.1002/nme.470210.1002/nme.4702 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10937810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109378 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11878410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118784 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.024 ↗
24. Huang Y. 2005. Theory study on the mechanical properties and binding energies of PBX based on HMX and TATB along different surface [M.S. thesis]. Nanjing University of Science and Technology.
25. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.01.01410.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.01.014 ↗
26. 10.1179/pom.1977.20.4.19910.1179/pom.1977.20.4.199 ↗
27. 10.1002/nag.301610.1002/nag.3016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.05.00710.1016/j.matdes.2004.05.007 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11106-009-9118-710.1007/s11106-009-9118-7 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.05010.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.050 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000062710.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000627 ↗
32. 10.22211/cejem/10971710.22211/cejem/109717 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep3534510.1038/srep35345 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10346-015-0664-410.1007/s10346-015-0664-4 ↗
35. 10.1179/1879139514Y.000000012710.1179/1879139514Y.0000000127 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.178035710.1063/1.1780357 ↗
37. 10.1023/A:102568143226010.1023/A:1025681432260 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apt.2023.10430210.1016/j.apt.2023.104302 ↗
39. 10.1002/prep.20120020410.1002/prep.201200204 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.11898510.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118985 ↗
41. 10.1016/0032-5910(77)80008-910.1016/0032-5910(77)80008-9 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.504480510.1063/1.5044805 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10968310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109683 ↗
44. 10.1002/prep.20050003010.1002/prep.200500030 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.178028710.1063/1.1780287 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.05510.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.055 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.10.02010.1016/j.compgeo.2018.10.020 ↗
48. 10.1080/07370652.2017.135409810.1080/07370652.2017.1354098 ↗
49. 10.1063/5.027293010.1063/5.0272930 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.01.01010.1016/j.powtec.2005.01.010 ↗
51. 10.1023/A:101790250383910.1023/A:1017902503839 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.09.06110.1016/j.powtec.2016.09.061 ↗
53. 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62744-210.1016/S1003-6326(13)62744-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.enmf.2024.05.00210.1016/j.enmf.2024.05.002 ↗