Numerical study of the postcombustion effects on the underwater explosion of an aluminized explosive by a novel nonisentropic model for the detonation products
Source abstract
Abstract
An aluminized explosive detonating in the water is distinguished by the nonideal effects caused by the postcombustion of the aluminum additives. These effects play a big role in the noncontact underwater explosion phenomena, but they are usually ignored or smoothed in the conventional experimental tests, as well as in the numerical simulations with empirical models fitting to those test data. Here we propose a nonisovolumic and nonisentropic slow reaction model and then utilize the method of characteristics to analyze how and how much the postcombustion effects the entire flow field. Numerical examples show the near-field flow properties are appropriately obtained, the geometric dissimilarity of the product expansion is embodied and the enforcement of the additional energy release is tracked. These results imply the proposed methods can be used to reveal the mechanism of the postcombustion effects and shock wave enforcement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Combustion and Detonation Processes · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province, P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Autodyn, A. 2010. Interactive non-linear dynamic analysis software, version 13, user’s manual. Pittsburgh: SAS IP Inc.
2. 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01) ↗
3. 10.1063/1.306617610.1063/1.3066176 ↗
4. Gao, Z. D. 2006. Basis of chemical thermodynamics. Beijing: Peking University Press.
5. Howard W. M. L. E. Fried and P. C. Souers 1998. Kinetic modeling of non-ideal explosives with CHEETAH. Eleventh International Symposium on Detonation Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Snowmass Colorado 998–1006.
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(199906)24:03<140::AID-PREP140>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(199906)24:03<140::AID-PREP140>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
7. 10.1002/prep.20080004810.1002/prep.200800048 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.86294010.1063/1.862940 ↗
9. 10.1002/prep.1997022060810.1002/prep.19970220608 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.367360210.1063/1.3673602 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.486836010.1063/1.4868360 ↗
12. 10.1002/prep.20170026610.1002/prep.201700266 ↗
13. 10.1002/prep.20110013810.1002/prep.201100138 ↗
14. 10.1557/PROC-418-41310.1557/PROC-418-413 ↗
15. 10.1557/PROC-296-29910.1557/PROC-296-299 ↗
16. Paszula, J., W. A. Trzciński, and K. Sprzątczak. 2008. Detonation performance of aluminium–ammonium nitrate explosives. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials 5:3.
17. 10.7520/1001-4888-13-20210.7520/1001-4888-13-202 ↗
18. 10.1002/prep.1990015020410.1002/prep.19900150204 ↗
19. 10.1002/prep.1996021050610.1002/prep.19960210506 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10573-008-0073-210.1007/s10573-008-0073-2 ↗
21. 10.1002/prep.20130002610.1002/prep.201300026 ↗
22. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2008.04.01810.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2008.04.018 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.498688110.1063/1.4986881 ↗