Evaluation of small-scale combustion of an insensitive high explosive formulation containing 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO), 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN), and 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX)
Source abstract
Abstract
Energetic materials are often disposed by open-burning or open-detonation as it is a cost-effective and efficient means of destroying explosive material, and often minimizes the need to transport hazardous explosives to treatment facilities. This practice is often scrutinized for the negative environmental impact of the odorous and unsightly toxic gaseous emissions as well as the resulting deposition residues, which often contain unburned energetic materials. With the increasing use of Insensitive High Explosive compositions in munitions, it is essential that the potential environmental impact of their disposal is assessed before their extensive use to prevent the kind of contamination incidents experienced with legacy explosives. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop a controlled laboratory experiment to identify the gaseous emissions and the energetic material residues that are generated through the combustion of the IHE components 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO), 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN), and 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX). A sealed vial containing small (mg) quantities of energetic material was heated until the energetic material combusted. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS) was used to calculate the oxygen consumption and to identify the gases that were generated. The solid residues were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to quantify unburned energetic material. Results showed that DNAN was the most resistant to burning, thus leaving significant quantities of unreacted starting material in the vial. An interesting observation for the IHE formulation was that DNAN also inhibited the combustion of NTO and RDX. The gases emitted during the open burning of IHE components and mixtures included CO, CO2, and N2O as expected, but the proportions differed when the components and mixture were compared, reflecting the influence of DNAN on the burning behavior. From our data, we concluded that open-burning DNAN-based formulations is an environmentally unfavorable waste-management practice for the disposal of IHEs mainly due to generation of solid residues as well as unburnt DNAN.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Defence Chemistry, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Swindon, UK
Chemical Engineering, IME – Instituto Militar De Engenharia, Brazilian Army, Brazil
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.02.00410.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.02.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.11.30710.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.11.307 ↗
3. Association Francaise de Normalisation · 2006
4. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.02910.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800020-5.00004-110.1016/B978-0-12-800020-5.00004-1 ↗
6. 10.2134/jeq2007.019710.2134/jeq2007.0197 ↗
7. 10.1021/j100072a00910.1021/j100072a009 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80288-810.1016/S0082-0784(96)80288-8 ↗
9. 10.1021/j100098a02010.1021/j100098a020 ↗
10. British Standard Institution · 2016
11. BSI British Standard · 2002
12. BSI British Standard · 2011
13. BSI British Standard · 2012
14. Chemring Nobel AS. 2013. MSDS - material safety data sheet - NTO. Norway.
15. 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.00210.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1080/1532038090308568310.1080/15320380903085683 ↗
17. Cooper P. · 1996
18. 10.1002/prep.20130006910.1002/prep.201300069 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.04310.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.043 ↗
20. Dodd, D. E., and J. N. McDougal. 2001. “Recommendation of an Occupational Expsure Level for PAX-21 (AFRL‐HE‐WP‐TR‐2001‐0103).” Technical Report. Ohio: U.S. Air Force Armstrong Laboratory.
21. 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00358-210.1016/S0304-3894(01)00358-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.chemosphere10.1016/j.chemosphere ↗
23. 10.1088/1742-6596/500/19/19200110.1088/1742-6596/500/19/192001 ↗
24. Gjersøe, R. 2011. MSDS - material safety data sheet - RDX. Norway.
25. Hawari, J. 2014. “Environmental fate and ecological impact of emerging energetic chemicals (ADN, DNAN and its amino-derivatives, PETN, NTO, NQ, FOX-7 and FOX-12) and an insensitive formulation.” Vol. 3.
26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.04710.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.047 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.06610.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.066 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.06110.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.061 ↗
29. Koch, E.C., V. Weiser, and R. Webb. 2009. Review on thermochemical codes. Bruxelles, Belgique.
30. 10.1007/BF0211157110.1007/BF02111571 ↗
31. Lee K. E. · 2010
32. 10.1016/j.pecs.2003.08.00110.1016/j.pecs.2003.08.001 ↗
33. Lent, E. M., L. C. B. Crouse, T. Hanna, and S. Wallace. 2012. “The subchronic oral toxicity of DNAN and NTO in rats. report: 87-XE-0DBP-10.” US Army Institute of Public Health.10.21236/ADA563070 ↗
34. London, J. O., and D. M. Smith. 1985. “A Toxicological study of NTO.” Report. Los Alamos, New Mexico.
35. Mark, N. W. 2016. “Batch and column transport studies of environmental fate of 3-Nitro-1, 2, 4-Triazol-5-One (NTO) in Soils.” The University of Arizona.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.067 ↗
36. McCain, W., L. Williams, and R. Grunda. 2013. “Toxicology Portfolio In Vitro Dermal Absorption of Insensitive Munitions Explosive 101 (IMX-101) and Components.” Report ADA 584068. US Army Public Health Command.10.21236/ADA584068 ↗
37. 10.1002/978352761704310.1002/9783527617043 ↗
38. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-126310.1002/(ISSN)1099-1263 ↗
39. Mitchell, W., and J. Suggs. 1998. “Emission factors for the disposal of energetic materials by open burning and open detonation (OB/OD) - EPA/600/R-98/103.”
40. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.01.00310.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.01.003 ↗
41. Oxley J. C. · 199 · 418 · 135
42. 10.1002/prep.20150015010.1002/prep.201500150 ↗
43. 10.1155/2012/61723610.1155/2012/617236 ↗
44. Pico Technology Limited · 2016
45. Primus, F. J., M. D. Goldenberg, and S. Hills. 1988. United States Patent US4733610-3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one, a less sensitive explosive. US4733610, issued 1988.
46. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.00410.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.004 ↗
47. Shapira, N. I., J. Patterson, J. Brown, and K. Noll. 1978. “EPA-600/2-78-012 - state of the art study: Demilitarization of conventional munitions.” Cincinati, Ohio.
48. 10.1007/978-90-481-2342-1-1910.1007/978-90-481-2342-1-19 ↗
49. Sigma-Aldrich. 2012. “MSDS - material safety data sheet - DNAN.” Dorset, United Kingdon.
50. Singh G. · 2015
51. Singh S. · 2010
52. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.01110.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.011 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.14210.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.142 ↗
54. Tech, T. 2002. Open burning/open detonation permitting guidelines.Philadelphia, P.A.
55. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.26410.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.264 ↗
56. Thermo_Fisher. 2018. Alfa aesar, thermo fisher scientific.
57. 10.1088/978-0-7503-1605-7ch1110.1088/978-0-7503-1605-7ch11 ↗
58. Van-Ham, N., Bartelds, H. 1991. “Environmentally acceptable disposal of ammunition and explosives.” Report. Rijswijk, The Nethrlands: TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory.
59. Volk, F., and H. Bathelt. 1988. “User’s manual for the ICT-thermodynamic code/Vol. 1.” ICT-Report 14/88. Pfinztal, Germany.
60. Volk, F., and H. Bathelt. 1991a. “User’s manual for the ICT-thermodynamic code/Vol. 2.” ICT-Report 1/91. Pfinztal, Germany.
61. Volk, F., and H. Bathelt. 1991b. “User’s manual for the ICT-thermodynamic code/Vol. 3.” ICT-Report 2/91. Pfinztal, Germany.
62. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.05610.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.056 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11270-012-1141-510.1007/s11270-012-1141-5 ↗