Making progress towards promising energetic cellulosic microcrystals developed from alternative lignocellulosic biomasses
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study reported the valorization of various alternative lignocellulosic feedstocks including giant reed (GR), palm fronds (PF) and esparto grass (EG) for the development of promising nitrated structurally modified cellulosic biopolymers (NNCs). The extracted nanostructured cellulose precursors and their nitrated derivatives were analyzed for their physicochemical properties, chemical structure, crystallinity and thermal stability. Experimental findings confirmed the successful formation of the desired energetic NNCs polymers with increased densities (1.698–1.711 g/cm3) and high nitrogen contents (13.10–13.26%) followed the order NNC-EG>NNC-PF>NNC-GR, which are greater than those of the commonly used nitrocellulose (1.650–1.670 g/cm3 and 12.50–12.70%). Furthermore, isoconversional integral models (TAS, it-KAS and VYA/CE) were exploited based on non-isothermal DSC data to investigate their thermal decomposition kinetics. The predicted kinetic parameters displayed that the synthesized energy-rich NNCs presented close values of Arrhenius parameters within the range of 156 ≤ Eα (kJ/mol) ≤163 and 14.7 ≤ Log(A(s−1) ≤ 15.6, and decomposed following diverse reaction mechanisms. Consequently, the explored lignocellulosic biomasses could be considered as valuable alternative non-woody resources for the production of advanced high-energy dense cellulosic biopolymers for potential application in the next generation of solid propellant formulations and composite explosives.KEYWORDS: Lignocellulosic sourcesnanostructured cellulosenitrationphysicochemical propertiesisoconversional kinetics Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementsAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.Statement of noveltyThe novelty of the current study is the valorization of low-cost alternative lignocellulosic biomasses namely, giant reed, esparto grass and palm fronds to develop promising energetic nanostructured cellulosic biopolymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Energetic Materials Laboratory, Teaching and Research Unit of Energetic Processes, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Algiers, Algeria
Energetic Propulsion Laboratory, Teaching and Research Unit of Energetic Processes, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, Algiers, Algeria
Department of Chemistry, Ludwig Maximilian University Butenandtstrasse, Munich, Germany
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11307510.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113075 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0055310.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00553 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1318303010.3390/polym13183030 ↗
4. 10.1134/S001050821704001310.1134/S0010508217040013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11731110.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117311 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17857010.1016/j.tca.2020.178570 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10570-021-03842-610.1007/s10570-021-03842-6 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12649-020-01198-910.1007/s12649-020-01198-9 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10924-020-01972-910.1007/s10924-020-01972-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11342310.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113423 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.5032910.1002/app.50329 ↗
12. 10.3390/nano912169410.3390/nano9121694 ↗
13. 10.1002/kin.2141610.1002/kin.21416 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tca.2019.01.01510.1016/j.tca.2019.01.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.10045010.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100450 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.02410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.024 ↗
17. Chuayplod, P., and D. Aht-Ong. 2018. A study of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from parawood (Hevea brasiliensis) sawdust waste using different acid types. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals 28 (2):106–114.
18. 10.1016/j.trac.2011.06.01410.1016/j.trac.2011.06.014 ↗
19. 10.3390/nano910138610.3390/nano9101386 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11208510.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112085 ↗
21. 10.1051/matecconf/20182430000510.1051/matecconf/201824300005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17885910.1016/j.tca.2020.178859 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10924-020-02012-210.1007/s10924-020-02012-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17874710.1016/j.tca.2020.178747 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.02910.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.029 ↗
26. 10.1109/MNANO.2019.295222610.1109/MNANO.2019.2952226 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10570-021-03837-310.1007/s10570-021-03837-3 ↗
28. 10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.2110.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.21 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.01510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.015 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8SE00166A10.1039/C8SE00166A ↗
31. 10.1007/978-981-13-6647-510.1007/978-981-13-6647-5 ↗
32. 10.1039/C8NJ02018C10.1039/C8NJ02018C ↗
33. 10.1002/prep.20190031910.1002/prep.201900319 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11144-020-01898-210.1007/s11144-020-01898-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.02.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.02.002 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10973-021-10686-610.1007/s10973-021-10686-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11698610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116986 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12649-021-01495-x10.1007/s12649-021-01495-x ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.019 ↗
40. 10.1002/prep.20200024010.1002/prep.202000240 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12649-020-01123-010.1007/s12649-020-01123-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.01610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.016 ↗
43. 10.1007/978-3-319-59208-4_410.1007/978-3-319-59208-4_4 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12871010.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128710 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0434110.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04341 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12205610.1016/j.fuel.2021.122056 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0111510.1021/acsomega.1c01115 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.10545310.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105453 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17870710.1016/j.tca.2020.178707 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11825910.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118259 ↗
51. 10.1039/9781788019521-0011310.1039/9781788019521-00113 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.17610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.176 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.00910.1016/j.dt.2021.03.009 ↗
54. 10.1039/D0NJ05484D10.1039/D0NJ05484D ↗
55. 10.1007/s10570-021-03965-w10.1007/s10570-021-03965-w ↗
56. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11682010.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116820 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12596010.1016/j.cej.2020.125960 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0544810.1021/acs.iecr.0c05448 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10570-019-02672-x10.1007/s10570-019-02672-x ↗
60. 10.1002/macp.20190035810.1002/macp.201900358 ↗
61. 10.1007/s10973-016-5962-010.1007/s10973-016-5962-0 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10853-017-1474-y10.1007/s10853-017-1474-y ↗
63. 10.1201/9781351021623-1110.1201/9781351021623-11 ↗
64. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0039210.3389/fchem.2020.00392 ↗
65. 10.1002/prep.20180026910.1002/prep.201800269 ↗
66. 10.1007/s10973-016-5293-110.1007/s10973-016-5293-1 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.056 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17859710.1016/j.tca.2020.178597 ↗
69. 10.1007/s10570-021-04162-510.1007/s10570-021-04162-5 ↗
70. 10.1007/s10570-005-9034-z10.1007/s10570-005-9034-z ↗
71. Yolhamid, M. N. A. G., F. Ibrahim, M. A. U. A. A. Zarim, R. Ibrahim, S. Adnan, and M. Z. A. Yahya. 2018. the processing of nitrocellulose from rhizophora, palm oil bunches (EFB) and kenaf fibres as a propellant grade. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7 (4.29):59–65.10.14419/ijet.v7i4.29.21844 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12185710.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121857 ↗