journal article·2026-04-03

Effect of curative in hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene-based binder system on characteristic properties and kinetics of polymer-based energetic composite

Prateek Kishore, Arjun Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Pramod Kumar Soni, Preeti Thakur, Atul Thakur

Journal of Energetic Materials· Volume 44· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

A series of polymer-based energetic composites (PEC) comprising 90% (by wt.) of crystalline octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) filler and 10% (by wt.) of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB)-based binder system cured with different curing agents were prepared by cast cured technique. The effects of HTPB-based binder cured with different curing agents on the characteristic properties were investigated through different analytical and instrument techniques. The chemical stability was studied through vacuum stability tester apparatus at 100°C for 40 h. The results show that all energetic composites are chemically stable and compatible with each other. The results indicate that there is considerable variation in the impact and friction sensitivity with varying of the curing agents in the HTPB-based binder system. Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry measurements show that the thermal stability does not depend on the curing agents used. The detonation study outcomes show that the detonation performance of the composites is quite different, depending on the types of the curing agents used. The kinetic parameters for thermal decomposition were studied through the TGA methods at multiple heating rates by using the kinetic Ozawa, Kissinger, and Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) methods. The PEC/TDI, PEC/IPDI, PEC/MDI, and PEC/TMDI samples showed average activation energies of 236.5, 208.7, 192.8, and 250.3 kJ/mol, respectively. These values are consistent and comparable to those obtained from other kinetic methods. However, the activation energy varies with varying the curing agent used in HTPB-based binder system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Rocket and propulsion systems research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory

Amity University

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.22211/cejem/6495410.22211/cejem/64954 ↗
2. 10.1080/07370652.2023.223660810.1080/07370652.2023.2236608 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10287810.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102878 ↗
4. 10.1177/0954008321107365410.1177/09540083211073654 ↗
5. Akahira, T., and T. Sunose. 1971. Method of determining activation deterioration constant of electrical insulating materials. Res. Report CHIBA Inst. Technol 6:22–31.
6. 10.1002/app.4728910.1002/app.47289 ↗
7. 10.1002/prep.20210028310.1002/prep.202100283 ↗
8. Ang, H. G., and S. Pisharath. 2012. Polymers as binders and plasticizers–historical perspective. Energetic polymers: Binders and plasticizers for enhancing performance, 1–17. Weinheim: V CH.
9. ASTM E698. 2016. Standard Test method for kinetic parameters for thermally unstable materials using differential scanning calorimetry and the flynn/wall/ozawa method. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
10. ASTM International. 2016. ASTM E698-16 - standard test method for kinetic parameters for 141 thermally unstable materials using differential scanning calorimetry and the 142 flynn/wall/ozawa method. 100 barr harbor drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA, vol. 143, 19428–2959. United States.
11. Blumenthal, W. R., D. G. Thompson, C. M. Cady, G. T. Gray III, and D. J. Idar. 2002. Compressive properties of PBXN-110 and its HTPB binder as a function of temperature and strain rate. United States. 12th International Detonation Symposium August, 11–16, San Diego, CA 92101.
12. 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v6.i3.2010.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v6.i3.20 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10973-022-11355-y10.1007/s10973-022-11355-y ↗
14. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.03310.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/0010-2180(91)90109-O10.1016/0010-2180(91)90109-O ↗
16. 10.1007/s10973-006-8041-010.1007/s10973-006-8041-0 ↗
17. The Effect of Ageing on PBXW-115. 1995. PBXN-103 (Aust.) and 105. Defence Science and Technology Organisation. Report DSTO-TR-0228. Australia.
18. 10.22211/cejem/6489910.22211/cejem/64899 ↗
19. Elbeih, A., S. Zeman, M. Jungova, and Z. Akstein. 2012. Effect of different polymeric matrices on the sensitivity and performance of interesting cyclic nitramines. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials 9:131–38.
20. Fu, X., X. Fan, L. Meng, H. Yu, and X. Liu. 2014. Synthesis of epoxidized hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene and its application prospect in propellant. Chemical Propellants Polymer Materials 12:23–26.
21. 10.1039/C5RA01965F10.1039/C5RA01965F ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0191416210.1007/BF01914162 ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970620)64:12<2347:AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970620)64:12<2347:AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1060510.1002/app.10605 ↗
25. 10.14429/dsj.67.1053310.14429/dsj.67.10533 ↗
26. 10.22211/cejem/6496810.22211/cejem/64968 ↗
27. Jia-Hu, G., L. Yu-Cun, and C. Tao. 2015. A sutdy on the HTPB-isocyanate binder system curing at room temperature and related properties. Explosives Materials 44:7–11.
28. 10.1007/s10973-005-0442-010.1007/s10973-005-0442-0 ↗
29. 10.6028/jres.057.02610.6028/jres.057.026 ↗
30. 10.1021/ac60131a04510.1021/ac60131a045 ↗
31. 10.1080/10601325.2013.73627510.1080/10601325.2013.736275 ↗
32. 10.1002/prep.20080004810.1002/prep.200800048 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10973-020-09773-x10.1007/s10973-020-09773-x ↗
34. 10.1007/s11814-014-0366-y10.1007/s11814-014-0366-y ↗
35. 10.1007/s10973-016-5945-110.1007/s10973-016-5945-1 ↗
36. 10.1080/07370652.2019.167928110.1080/07370652.2019.1679281 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.01310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.01310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.013 ↗
39. 10.3390/coatings1208109010.3390/coatings12081090 ↗
40. 10.1002/app.1993.07048021110.1002/app.1993.070480211 ↗
41. 10.1080/0737065010821612910.1080/07370650108216129 ↗
42. NATO. 2001. Chemical compatibility of ammunition components with explosives (Non-Nuclear Applications). (WA), DC, USA: STANAG-4147; NATO Standardization Agreements.
43. NATO – STANAG 4443. 2003. Explosive, uniaxial compression test. Germany: NATO Standardization.
44. 10.1246/bcsj.38.188110.1246/bcsj.38.1881 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.00810.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.008 ↗
46. 10.1002/prep.20148015110.1002/prep.201480151 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.00410.1016/j.jaap.2010.07.004 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10973-019-08793-610.1007/s10973-019-08793-6 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.03.00810.1016/j.jiec.2013.03.008 ↗
50. 10.1080/07370652.2018.155233710.1080/07370652.2018.1552337 ↗
51. 10.1080/00222348.2020.180285010.1080/00222348.2020.1802850 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10973-020-09377-510.1007/s10973-020-09377-5 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10973-017-6335-z10.1007/s10973-017-6335-z ↗
54. 10.1007/s10973-018-7730-910.1007/s10973-018-7730-9 ↗
55. 10.1002/978111966940110.1002/9781119669401 ↗
56. STANAG 4556. 1999. Explosives: vacuum stability test. Brussels: North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Military Agency for Standardization.
57. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.02510.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.025 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.02510.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.025 ↗
59. 10.1021/cg049965a10.1021/cg049965a ↗
60. 10.1002/prep.20040005810.1002/prep.200400058 ↗
61. Vorozhtsov, A. B., D. Lt, A. Reina, M. I. Lerner, and N. G. Rodkevich. 2015. Effects of HTPB-coating on nano-sized aluminium in solid rocket propellant performance. Science Technologies Energy Materials 76:105–09.
62. 10.1002/prep.20090011010.1002/prep.200900110 ↗
63. 10.1007/s10973-014-4324-z10.1007/s10973-014-4324-z ↗
64. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.00710.1016/j.dt.2020.06.007 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.06310.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.063 ↗
66. 10.1002/prep.20050003810.1002/prep.200500038 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10973-020-09297-410.1007/s10973-020-09297-4 ↗
68. 10.3390/polym1307108010.3390/polym13071080 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10761110.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107611 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.08.01910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.08.019 ↗
71. 10.22211/cejem/10980610.22211/cejem/109806 ↗
72. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0617210.1021/acs.iecr.0c06172 ↗