journal article·2020-07-02

Particle size reduction of RDX by sequential application of solvent–antisolvent recrystallization and mechanical methods

Priyanka Pandita, Vandana Pathania Arya, Gurvinder Kaur, Suman Singh

Journal of Energetic Materials· Volume 38· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Solvent–antisolvent recrystallization produced ~8 µm average size RDX particles (UF-RDX) that were subsequently subjected to mechanical methods of ultrasonication and ball-milling to find further achievable reduction in particle size. Long duration ultrasonication for 20 h and 300 rpm ball milling for 4 h of UF-RDX decreased its average particle size to ~2 µm. RDX produced by all the three processes (solvent–antisolvent recrystallization, ultrasonication and ball-milling) was similar to coarser RDX in structure and thermal decomposition behavior. However, UF-RDX produced by solvent–antisolvent recrystallization was significantly less impact sensitive than that produced by ball-milling and ultrasonication. The issues of residual solvent and the metal contamination during RDX processing were addressed by process parameter optimization. Solvent–antisolvent recrystallization and mechanical methods even when used sequentially could not bring average particle size of RDX to nano-scale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre Complex, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India

Department of Quality Assurance Complex, Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory (TBRL), Chandigarh, India

Department of Agrionics, Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIO), Chandigarh, India

Funding

Recruitment and Assessment Centre

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2018/943608910.1155/2018/9436089 ↗
2. Bayat, Y., S. Shirazinia, and R. Marandi. 2010. Ultrasonic assisted preparation of nano HMX. International Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 6 (4):210–15.
3. 10.1002/prep.20080020710.1002/prep.200800207 ↗
4. 10.1002/prep.20080020110.1002/prep.200800201 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp105226s/10.1021/jp105226s/ ↗
6. 10.1154/1.191370910.1154/1.1913709 ↗
7. 10.1002/prep.20030001910.1002/prep.200300019 ↗
8. 10.1002/prep.20080009410.1002/prep.200800094 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11814-009-0187-610.1007/s11814-009-0187-6 ↗
10. 10.1021/ie201314r10.1021/ie201314r ↗
11. 10.1002/prep.20130010410.1002/prep.201300104 ↗
12. 10.1080/07370652.2014.98877410.1080/07370652.2014.988774 ↗
13. 10.1002/prep.20180013110.1002/prep.201800131 ↗
14. Pant, A., A. K. Nandi, S. P. Newale, V. P. Gajbhiye, H. Prasanth, and R. K. Pandey. 2013. Preparation and characterization of ultrafine RDX. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials 10 (3):393–407.
15. 10.1002/1521-4087(200112)26:5<226::AID-PREP226>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1521-4087(200112)26:5<226::AID-PREP226>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.05810.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.058 ↗
17. 10.1039/C0CE00443J10.1039/C0CE00443J ↗
18. 10.1002/prep.20170000210.1002/prep.201700002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.02710.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.027 ↗
20. 10.14429/dsj.59.148210.14429/dsj.59.1482 ↗
21. 10.1080/07370652.2017.133782810.1080/07370652.2017.1337828 ↗
22. 10.1002/prep.20090000210.1002/prep.200900002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.minpro.2004.07.01110.1016/j.minpro.2004.07.011 ↗
24. 10.1002/prep.20050000210.1002/prep.200500002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.10710.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.107 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10973-011-2191-410.1007/s10973-011-2191-4 ↗
27. Wang, Y., W. Jiang, X. Song, G. Deng, and F. Li. 2013b. Insensitive HMX (octahydro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetranitro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetrazocine) nanocrystals fabricated by high-yield, low-cost mechanical milling. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials 10 (2):277-287.
28. 10.1177/184798041666367810.1177/1847980416663678 ↗
29. 10.1186/s11671-017-2416-y10.1186/s11671-017-2416-y ↗
30. 10.1002/prep.20050003810.1002/prep.200500038 ↗
31. Zohari, N., M. H. Keshavarz, and S. A. Seyedsadjadi. 2013. The advantages and shortcomings of using nano-sized energetic materials. Central European Journal of EnergeticMaterials 10 (1):135–47.