Application of JWL parameters for low-density PETN in underwater explosive welding of aluminum-steel composite tubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-density pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN, 0.4 g·cm-3) was selected as the welding explosive for underwater explosive welding of metal tubes due to its small critical diameter. Given the significant influence of welding parameters on weld quality, numerical simulations were used to determine the optimal conditions for aluminum-steel composite tube welding, which were experimentally validated. To accurately simulate the explosive behavior during welding, the parameters for the Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) equation of state were derived from a cylinder test. In-situ photon Doppler velocimetry was employed to measure the expansion velocity histories of metal tubes in both cylinder tests and welding experiments. The underwater welding experiment achieved an impact velocity of 510 m·s-1 and a collision angle of 10.4°, with less than 5% deviation between simulated and experimental results, confirming the accuracy of the JWL parameters for low-density PETN. Both numerical and experimental approaches revealed a flat welding interface in the aluminum-steel composite tube, and microstructural observations aligned with simulation predictions. This study demonstrates that precise JWL parameters enable reliable prediction of welding parameters, offering an efficient methodology to optimize underwater explosive welding of metal tubes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southwest University of Science and Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Vibration of Engineering Materials and Structures Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Bauccio, M. 1993. ASM metals reference book. Ohio: ASM international.
2. 10.31399/asm.hb.v02.a000106010.31399/asm.hb.v02.a0001060 ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev.ms.05.080175.00114110.1146/annurev.ms.05.080175.001141 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.04210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.042 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.07510.1016/j.msea.2017.02.075 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0281496710.1007/BF02814967 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.148350710.1063/1.1483507 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.01910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.019 ↗
9. 10.2172/653031010.2172/6530310 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0074489310.1007/BF00744893 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.00110.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.001 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.240729010.1063/1.2407290 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40194-023-01495-610.1007/s40194-023-01495-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.09710.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.097 ↗
15. 10.2172/478390410.2172/4783904 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40194-024-01822-510.1007/s40194-024-01822-5 ↗
17. 10.1002/prep.20180012610.1002/prep.201800126 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.009 ↗
19. Marsh, S. P. 1980. LASL shock hugoniot data, California: University of California Press.
20. 10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66269-710.1016/S1003-6326(23)66269-7 ↗
21. Pei, H., B. Zhong, X. H. Li, X. Zhang, and X. X. Zheng. 2019. Study on the cylinder tests and equation of state in RDX based aluminized explosives. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants 42 (4):403–08.
22. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.11.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2023.11.023 ↗
23. Sanchidrian, J. A., R. Castedo, L. M. Lopez, P. Segarra, and A. P. Santos. 2015. Determination of the JWL constants for ANFO and emulsion explosives from cylinder test data. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials 12 (2):177–94.
24. 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.01610.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.016 ↗
25. 10.1155/1998/78203210.1155/1998/782032 ↗
26. Souers, P. C., B. Wu, and L. C. Haselman. 1996. Detonation equation of state at LLNL. Livermore: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
27. Steinberg, D. J. 1996. Equation of state and strength properties of selected materials. Livermore: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
28. 10.1063/1.32779910.1063/1.327799 ↗
29. 10.18485/aeletters.2018.3.2.210.18485/aeletters.2018.3.2.2 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10863010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108630 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.172127810.1063/1.1721278 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.01510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.015 ↗
33. Whiteman, R. H. 1973. The influence of collision parameters on the strength and microstructure of an explosion welded aluminum alloy. In Second International Symposium on the Use of Explosion Energy to Produce Metallic Materials with New Properties, Marianske Lazne (Czechoslovakia), ed. A. F. Demchuk, A. A. Deribas, V. A. Simonov, and A. M. Staver. doi: 10.1007/BF00756739.
34. Wu, X., and D. Qin. 1981. Polytropic exponent calculation of condensed explosives. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants 4 (2):1–9.
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10868510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108685 ↗
37. 10.1002/prep.20210034410.1002/prep.202100344 ↗
38. 10.22211/cejem/6869610.22211/cejem/68696 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0074231210.1007/BF00742312 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14226010.1016/j.msea.2021.142260 ↗