Modeling propellant fires radiant heat flux
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the main dangers associated with any fire is the radiant heat emitted during the event. The heat radiated by a fire can cause unwanted consequences, such as weakening nearby structures, igniting new material and harming people. Propellants are designed to burn at high velocities in the pressure regime of their applications. At atmospheric pressure, the smaller burning velocities of propellants result in a slower energy release and thus in large radiant heat doses being emitted. This study presents the results of experimental tests on various propellant fires. The conclusion is a general model predicting the maximum heat flux emitted during a propellant fire. This model relies on variables which are simple to obtain in a laboratory setting with any propellant sample. Comparing with previously published models reveals some differences that show the proposed conclusion to be a more general result. The final model shall be useful in designing safety guidelines and studying flame propagation in propellants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Valleyfield, Canada
Science department, Universite Sainte-Anne, Church Point, Canada
Department of mechanical, industrial and aerospace engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Department of mechanical engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Funding
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/andp.1884258061610.1002/andp.18842580616 ↗
2. 10.1080/0010220740896033510.1080/00102207408960335 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-710.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
4. Hay J. E. and R. W. Watson. 1992. Scaling studies of thermal radiation flux from burning propellants. Proceedings of the 25th DOD Safety Seminar Anaheim California.
5. 10.1201/978143989455210.1201/9781439894552 ↗
6. Krier, H., and M. Summerfi 1979. Interior ballistics of guns.In Progress in astronautics and aeronautics 66. American Institute of Aeronautics/Astronautics. New York, NY.
7. Kuo, K. K. 2005. Principles of combustion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
8. Lees, F. 2012. Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identifi ation, assessment and control. Butterworth-Heinemann. Burlington, MA.
9. Lienhard, J. H., and J. H. Lienhard. 2011. A heat transfer textbook. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
10. Lucotte L. P. 1982. Measurement and prediction of heat flux in gun propellant fires. Proceedings of the 20th DOD Safety Seminar Norfolk Virginia.
11. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-408710.1002/(ISSN)1521-4087 ↗
12. Miller, N. J., and J. C. Miller. 2010. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry. 6th. Harlow, England; New York: Prentice Hall/Pearson.
13. 10.1016/0010-2180(77)90106-710.1016/0010-2180(77)90106-7 ↗
14. 10.1080/05704928.2010.52962710.1080/05704928.2010.529627 ↗
15. Pedrotti, F. L., and L. S. Pedrotti. 1993. Introduction to optics. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
16. 10.1002/047009115010.1002/0470091150 ↗
17. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
18. Serway, R. A., C. J. Moses, and C. A. Moyer. 2004. Modern physics. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
19. 10.1177/10423915890010040410.1177/104239158900100404 ↗
20. Taylor, J. R. 1997. An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. 2nd. University Science Books. Sausalito, CA.
21. Tinkler W. S. N. 1982. Quantity-distances for hazard division 1.3 mass fire explosives. Proceedings of the 20th DOD Safety Seminar Norfolk Virginia.