journal article·2025-07-10

Detonation Reaction Characteristics and Shock Initiation Properties of RDX-Based Booster Explosives by Small-Scale Tests

Shupei Zhang, Danyang Liu, Kun Yang, Junnan Liu, Changhua Liu, Yaxin He, Kaining Zhang, Junying Wu, Lang Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Booster explosives play an important role in the energy amplification of ammunition. This paper developed small-scale tests with less than 20 g of explosive cost to understand the booster’s detonation characteristics and shock-to-detonation behavior. The cylinder test was modified to 10 mm in diameter and combined with interface particle velocity measurements, thereby allowing the detonation velocity, detonation reaction time, Chapman-Jouguet pressure, and metal acceleration ability to be obtained synchronously from one test. A small-scale shock initiation test was also proposed, which is equipped with a portable-reusable uniform magnetic-field generator based on permanent magnets and a plane wave generator-driven flyer for adjustable shock input. By embedding U-shaped electromagnetic gauges in 20 mm diameter explosive slices of different thicknesses, the growth of explosive particle velocity was measured. A typical booster, JH-14, composed of 96.5% RDX, was investigated. The tests show good repeatability and reliable results, and the ignition and growth reaction model and Pop-Plot were obtained accordingly. It was also found that a low content of binder can effectively affect the detonation growth behavior of explosives, compared to another formulation, 8701, composed of 95% RDX. These findings will contribute to the understanding of booster characteristics and the development of small-scale detonation tests.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Institute of Technology

Sichuan Huachuan Industry Co, Ltd

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China · Young Scientist Studio Program of State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science · Safety Protection of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.06.02210.1016/j.combustflame.2019.06.022 ↗
2. Armstrong, C., and P. Rae. 2020. The velocity of detonation and reaction zone profile in PBX 9502 as a function of initial density. AIP Conference Proceedings 2272 (1):050002.10.1063/12.0000934 ↗
3. Bouyer, V., P. Hebert, M. Doucet, L. Decaris, and L.-P. Terzulli. 2012. Test measurements of the chemical reaction zone of TATB and HMX based explosives. AIP Conference Proceedings 1426 (1):209–12.10.1063/1.3686256 ↗
4. 10.1002/prep.20160004810.1002/prep.201600048 ↗
5. Cheng, L., and Z. R. Li. 2001. The cylinder tests measured by VISAR interferometer. Explosion & Shock Waves 21 (3):229–32.
6. Chidester S. K. K. S. Vandersall and C. M. Tarver. 2009. Shock initiation of damaged explosives. Presented at: JANNAF interagency propulsion committee. United States Tucson AZ.
7. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.10.00910.1016/j.combustflame.2020.10.009 ↗
8. 10.1088/1742-6596/500/19/19200410.1088/1742-6596/500/19/192004 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.219519110.1063/1.2195191 ↗
10. Gustavsen, R. L., S. A. Sheffield, R. R. Alcon, L. G. Hill, R. E. Winter, D. A. Salisbury, and P. Taylor. 2000. Initiation of EDC-37 measured with embedded electromagnetic particle velocity gauges. AIP Conference Proceedings 505 (1):879–82.10.1063/1.1303608 ↗
11. Jones, H. 1947. A theory of the dependence of the rate of detonation of solid explosives on the diameter of the charge. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 189:415–26.
12. Lee E. D. Breithaupt C. McMillan N. Parker J. Kury C. Tarver W. Quirk and J. Walton. 1985. Motion of thin metal walls and the equation of state of detonation products. [LX-14 containing 95% HMX and 5% polyurethane]. 8. International symposium on detonation. USA Albuquerque NM.
13. Li, S., J. M. Yuan, Y. C. Liu, W. Z. Qin, Z. R. Xing, and X. Tang. 2016. Experiment and numerical simulation of shock initiation of JH-14C detonation device. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants 39 (6):63–68.
14. Li, Z. P., X. P. Long, and Y. M. Huang. 2005. Study and application of the multiple electromagnetic particle velocity gauge technique. Energetic Materials 13 (6):359–61.
15. 10.22211/cejem/7511410.22211/cejem/75114 ↗
16. 10.1002/prep.20170026610.1002/prep.201700266 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.12.00110.1016/j.dt.2020.12.001 ↗
18. Olinger B. 2007. Solid explosive plane-wave lenses pressed-to-shape with dies. Report No. LA-14347. Los Alamos National Lab Los Alamos NM USA.10.2172/948561 ↗
19. Pei, H. B., W. B. Huang, J. C. Qin, et al. 2018. Reaction zone structure of JB-9014 explosive measured by PDV. Explosion & Shock Waves 38 (3):485–90.
20. 10.1063/1.505787910.1063/1.5057879 ↗
21. Qin, J. C., H. B. Pei, et al. 2019. Measuring the detonation reaction zone structure of JOB-9003 explosive using PDV. Explosion & Shock Waves 39 (4):39–45.
22. Ramsay, J. B., and A. Popolato. 1965. Analysis of shock wave and initiation data for solid explosives. Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences & Applications 575 (1):158–61.
23. 10.1063/1.489071410.1063/1.4890714 ↗
24. Sheffield S. A. R. L. Gustavsen L. G. Hill and R. R. Alcon. 1998. Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating PBX9501 and PBX9502 explosives. Report No. LA-UR-98-3826. Los Alamos National Lab Los Alamos NM USA.10.2172/350871 ↗
25. Sućeska, M. 2001. EXPLO5-computer program for calculation of detonation parameters. 32th International Annual Conference of ICT, Karlsruhe, Germany.
26. 10.1002/prep.20210036710.1002/prep.202100367 ↗
27. Tarver C. M. J. O. Hallquist and L. M. Erickson. 1985. Modeling short pulse duration shock initiation of solid explosives. The 8th International symposium on detonation. Mex Albuquerque N.
28. 10.1134/S199079310802003610.1134/S1990793108020036 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.340757010.1063/1.3407570 ↗
30. Vandersall, K. S., C. M. Tarver, F. Garcia, and P. A. Urtiew. 2006. Shock initiation experiments on PBX9501 explosive at 150 C for ignition and growth modeling. AIP Conference Proceedings 845 (1):1127–30.
31. Vandersall, K. S., C. M. Tarver, F. Garcia, P. A. Urtiew, and S. K. Chidester. 2007. Shock initiation experiments on the HMX based explosive LX-10 with associated ignition and growth modeling. AIP Conference Proceedings 955 (1):1010–13.
32. 10.1002/prep.20150015210.1002/prep.201500152 ↗
33. Wang, D. T., Z. R. Li, and J. R. Wu. 2009. An optical-fiber displacement interferometer for measuring velocities of explosively-driven metal plates (in Chinese). Bao Zha Yu Chong Ji (explosion and Shock Waves) 29:105–08.
34. Wang, Z. S., Y. C. Liu, and J. L. Zhang. 2003. Effect of charge size on reliability of booster ignition. China Safety Science Journal 13 (2):31–33.
35. Yao, H. S., F. L. Huang, and B. P. Zhang. 2007. Experimental study on the impact damage and shock initiation of damaged explosives. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology 27 (6):487–90.
36. Yu, C., W. H. Liu, L. Z. Li, M. X. Feng, S. Y. Yang, and X. P. Long. 1997. Studies on cylinder test and JWL equation of state of detonation product for insensitive high explosive. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics 11 (3):227–33.
37. 10.1002/prep.20190009210.1002/prep.201900092 ↗