Study on dynamic deformation-damage-ignition mechanism of GAP/RDX/TEGDN propellant
Source abstract
Abstract
Investigations on high-energy and low-vulnerability propellants can provide a better understanding for improving the operational effectiveness and survivability of strategic and tactical missiles. In the present study, the dynamic compressive mechanical properties and damage-ignition response mechanism of the GAP/RDX/TEGDN (GRT) propellant under high strain rates have been studied using a split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus and a high-performance high-speed camera. The experimental results suggested that the mechanical properties of the GRT propellant, in terms of yield stress, initial compressive modulus, and ultimate stress, were greatly affected by the loaded strain rate. The true stress-strain curves exhibited an initial linear elasticity region followed by yielding a subsequent strain hardening and strain softening region stage. It has been found that the yield stress and ultimate stress increased with the strain rates. Moreover, at higher strain rates, the impulse increases significantly, leading to earlier and more intense ignition. The critical strain rate and the critical impulse of the GRT propellant are 5000 s−1 and 13.28 N · s, respectively. A judgment basis for GRT propellant ignition is established. Finally, according to the high-speed images and the posttest SEM images, it has been concluded that the dominant ignition mechanism of GRT propellant is flow at the macroscopic level and internal frictional heating at the mesoscopic level.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Institute of Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90187-110.1016/0013-7944(87)90187-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.005 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.498559310.1063/1.4985593 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.005 ↗
5. 10.1080/15685551.2019.157565210.1080/15685551.2019.1575652 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.03410.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.034 ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-410.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-013-7378-610.1007/s10853-013-7378-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.dt.2022.08.00610.1016/j.dt.2022.08.006 ↗
10. 10.1080/07370652.2023.222984410.1080/07370652.2023.2229844 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10781410.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107814 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10747210.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107472 ↗
13. 10.2514/3.2351410.2514/3.23514 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ast.2023.10817010.1016/j.ast.2023.108170 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0108650810.1007/BF01086508 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.10310.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.103 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.01610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.016 ↗
18. Kennedy, J. E., and B. W. Asay. 2010. Impact and shear ignition by nonshock mechanisms in “Non-Shock initiation of Explosives. Berlin: Springer.
19. Krzewinski, B., O. Blake, R. Lieb, Baker P, VandeKieft L. Shear deformation and shear initiation of explosives and propellants, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Detonation Symposium, California: Sandiego, 2002, pp. 11–16.
20. 10.1002/prep.1988013060410.1002/prep.19880130604 ↗
21. 10.1002/prep.20110013610.1002/prep.201100136 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.13210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.132 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.10410910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104109 ↗
24. 10.1002/prep.20170021110.1002/prep.201700211 ↗
25. 10.1002/prep.20140015110.1002/prep.201400151 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ast.2012.08.01210.1016/j.ast.2012.08.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ast.2013.12.00410.1016/j.ast.2013.12.004 ↗
28. 10.1063/5.006871510.1063/5.0068715 ↗
29. Provatas, A. 2000. Energetic polymers and plasticisers for explosive formulations - a review of recent advances, DSTO–TR0966. Australia: DSTO.
30. 10.1063/1.130355910.1063/1.1303559 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0242789710.1007/BF02427897 ↗
32. Sunny, G. P. 2011. A high strain-rate investigation of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass and an HTPB polymer composite. Cleveland, Ohio (USA): Case Western Reserve University.
33. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2015.06.002 ↗
34. 10.1002/prep.20180014310.1002/prep.201800143 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.05.00910.1016/j.dt.2021.05.009 ↗
36. 10.1002/prep.20170002210.1002/prep.201700022 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11118510.1016/j.matdes.2022.111185 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.02.007 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.4351210.1002/app.43512 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.10710.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.107 ↗
41. 10.1063/5.004678510.1063/5.0046785 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.02.00710.1016/j.dt.2021.02.007 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.514521610.1063/1.5145216 ↗
44. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00186-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00186-7 ↗
45. Zhao, Y., X. H. Zhang, W. Zhang, X. F. Qi, W. X. Xie, H. J. Xu, Y. F. Liu. 2015. Molecular dynamics simulation on compatibility of GAP and three energetic insensitive plasticizer blends. New Chemical Materials 43 (11):185–87.
46. Zheng, J., W. Q. Wang, Cheng X, Xu JS, Zhou CS. 2015. Effects of loading rate and microstructure on dynamic fracture toughness of CMDB propellant. Journal of Propulsion Technology 36 (6):940–46.