Modeling the Combustion-Deflagration-Detonation Transition (CoDDT) in a porous high explosive, comparison with experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
A reactive multiphase model stemming from the Baer and Nunziato model was developed and extended to three phases, one solid and two gaseous respectively representing the solid explosive, the initial porosity and the reaction products. It was used to model the transition from deflagration to detonation of a highly confined porous HMX 150–200 explosive thermally initiated, for several initial densities, ranging from 65% to 88% of the material's Theoretical Maximum Density (TMD). The influence of the deconsolidative burning in the critical acceleration of the reactive front was implemented through a fluidization parameter, allowing to switch from pore to grain burning. Other microstructural parameters such as the pores and grains size were determined by careful experimental characterizations presented in Bouchet et al. (2022). The model then succeeded in reproducing the physical mechanisms that were previously experimentally observed, such as the convective burning, the plug formation, and the transition to detonation at the distances that were experimentally measured.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université de Poitiers
French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0301-9322(86)90033-910.1016/0301-9322(86)90033-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/0010-2180(86)90068-410.1016/0010-2180(86)90068-4 ↗
3. 10.1051/epjconf/2010100002110.1051/epjconf/20101000021 ↗
4. 10.2172/9553410.2172/95534 ↗
5. 10.1016/0010-2180(74)90017-010.1016/0010-2180(74)90017-0 ↗
6. 10.1080/07370652.2022.213774010.1080/07370652.2022.2137740 ↗
7. 10.2172/530346410.2172/5303464 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.01510.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.015 ↗
9. 10.1002/prep.20230022310.1002/prep.202300223 ↗
10. Fifer, R. A., and J. E. Cole. 1981. Transitions from laminar burning for porous crystalline explosives. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Detonation, Annapolis, MD, USA, 164–74.
11. 10.1039/jr960000415410.1039/jr9600004154 ↗
12. 10.1063/12.002044010.1063/12.0020440 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.139804210.1063/1.1398042 ↗
14. Marsch, S. P. 1980. LASL shock hugoniot data. Berkley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
15. 10.1063/1.86994110.1063/1.869941 ↗
16. 10.1007/9783-540-87953-410.1007/9783-540-87953-4 ↗
17. McAfee, J. M., B. W. Asay, A. W. Campbell, and J. B. Ramsay. 1989. Deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular HMX. In 9th Symposium (International) on Detonation, Portland, OR, USA, 265–279.
18. Mikart M. 2019. Capture par mousse aqueuse de particules micrométriques disperses par explosive. Étude expérimentale et numérique. PhD thesis ISAE-ENSMA Poitiers (France).
19. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.04010.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.040 ↗
20. Parker, G. R., J. Tringe, E. M. Heatwole, M. De Haven, and M. Holmes. 2018. Understanding sub-detonative burning and variability in DDT characteristics for granular HMX confined in polycarbonate tubes. In 16th International Detonation Symposium, Chesapeake, MD, USA.
21. 10.1002/prep.20180009910.1002/prep.201800099 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.05410.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.054 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.490325910.1063/1.4903259 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00193-006-0065-710.1007/s00193-006-0065-7 ↗
25. 10.1023/A:100421031793910.1023/A:1004210317939 ↗