Effects of Different Orientation Angle, Size, Surface Roughness, and Heat Curing on Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Cement Mortar With/Without Glass Fiber in Powder-Based 3DP
Source abstract
Abstract
Powder-based (inkjet) three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology presents great promise in the construction industry. The capacity to build complex geometries is one of the most appealing features of the process without formwork. This article focuses on the vital aspect of using a modified powder (CP) instead of commercial powder (ZP 151). It also discusses the effects of the size of specimens and the curing process of 3DP specimens. This article presents not only the improved mechanical properties of the mortar that are revealed through a heat-curing procedure but also the properties of the reinforced mortar with chopped glass fibers. Experiments are conducted on cubic printed mortar specimens and cured in an oven at different temperature regimes. Tests show that 80°C is the optimum heat-curing temperature to attain the highest compressive and flexural strength of the specimens. The orientation angle has a significant effect on the mechanical behavior of printed specimens. Therefore, specimens are prepared by printing at different orientation angles to compare the mechanical properties of common construction materials. Powder-based 3DP has three planes ( XY , XZ , and YZ ) along which a load can be applied to the specimen. The mechanical strength in each direction across each plane is different, making it an anisotropic material. For CP specimens, the highest compressive strength was obtained using a 0° rotation in the printing orientation of the XY plane. For shear strength, a 45° orientation gave the optimum result, while for tensile and flexural strength, a 0° orientation provided the highest values. The optimum strength for ZP 151 specimens in compression, shear, tension, and bending was obtained by printing with orientation angles of 0°, 30°, 0°, and 0°, respectively. Finally, laser scanning of the printed specimens has been conducted so the surface roughness profiles for the 3DP specimens of ZP 151 and CP can be compared and presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
School of Mechanical and Mechantronic Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Haroglu H. Investigating the Structural Frame Decision Making Process. Loughborough University: United Kingdom, 2010.
2. 10.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00016-610.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00016-6 ↗
3. Chu SH, , Li LG, , Kwan AKH. Development of extrudable high strength fiber reinforced concrete incorporating nano calcium carbonate. Addit Manuf, 2021; 37:101617.
4. ASTM:F2792-12a. American Society of Testing and Materials (withdrawn). 2012.
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.01110.1016/j.cad.2014.02.011 ↗
7. 10.1617/s11527-015-0571-010.1617/s11527-015-0571-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.00410.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
9. 10.1080/17452759.2016.124291510.1080/17452759.2016.1242915 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00168.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00168.x ↗
11. 3D Systems. ZPrinter 150/ZPrinter 250 Overview. 2012. http://infocenter.3dsystems.com/product-library/sites/default/files/printers/Z_Printer/Z150_250/95008%20ZPrinter%20150%20and%20250%20User%20Manual.pdf (last accessed December11 2019).
12. 10.3923/jas.2011.584.58810.3923/jas.2011.584.588 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
14. Pena F. The role of the tension strength in the collapse mechanism of unreinforced brick masonry constructions. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver B.C. Canada 2004.
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.13210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.132 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.00110.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.055 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.02710.1016/j.msec.2014.01.027 ↗
20. Shanjani Y Toyserkani E. Material spreading and compaction in powder-based solid freeform fabrication methods: mathematical modeling. In: 19th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium SFF University of Texas Austin USA 2008.
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.09210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.092 ↗
22. 10.1155/2014/46851010.1155/2014/468510 ↗
23. Sanjayan G, , Stocks L. Spalling of high-strength silica fume concrete in fire. Mater J, 1993; 90:170–173.
24. Li VC, , Maalej M. Toughening in cement based composites. Part II: fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Cement Concr Compos, 1996; 18:239–249.
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.079 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.06510.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.065 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.12310.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123 ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.010825210.1371/journal.pone.0108252 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
31. Letcher T Waytashek M. Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. In: ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition American Society of Mechanical Engineers Montreal Quebec Canada 2014.10.1115/IMECE2014-39379 ↗
32. Coelho AWF, , da Silva Moreira Thiré RM, , Araujo AC. Manufacturing of gypsum–sisal fiber composites using binder jetting. Addit Manuf, 2019; 29:100789.
33. 10.1007/s43452-021-00209-310.1007/s43452-021-00209-3 ↗
34. 3D Systems. ZP151 Powder Safety Data Sheet. 2013. http://infocenter.3dsystems.com/materials/sites/default/files/sds-files/legacy/powders/ZP151/2548_360201-S12-02-A SDS%20GHS English zp151.pdf (last accessed December11 2019).
35. Shakor P, , Nejadi S, , Paul G, et al. Mechanical properties of cement-based materials and effect of elevated temperature on three-dimensional (3-D) printed mortar specimens in inkjet 3-D printing. ACI Mater J, 2019; 116:55–67.
36. 10.1155/2013/67378610.1155/2013/673786 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10856-008-3465-710.1007/s10856-008-3465-7 ↗
38. 3D Systems. ZB63 Safety Data Sheet. 2012. http://infocenter.3dsystems.com/materials/sites/default/files/sds-files/legacy/binders/ZB63/2548_50423-S12-01-A%2CGHS%2CEnglish-Australia%2Czb63.pdf (last accessed December11 2019).
39. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.10296410.1016/j.autcon.2019.102964 ↗
40. ASTMC39. 39, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, 2001.
41. ASTMC293/C293M. 293 Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Center-Point Loading). ASTM Standard 2002.
42. 10.1016/j.acme.2017.12.00310.1016/j.acme.2017.12.003 ↗
43. ASTM:D638. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. 2014.
44. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.01610.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.016 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.00510.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.005 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma1006064210.3390/ma10060642 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.003 ↗
48. Bellego CL, , Gérard B, , Pijaudier-Cabot G. Chemo-mechanical effects in mortar beams subjected to water hydrolysis. J Eng Mech, 2000; 126:266–272.
49. Sagoe-Crentsil K, , Weng L. Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: part II. High Si/Al ratio systems. J Mater Sci, 2007; 42:3007–3014.
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.047 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cherd.2019.10.05010.1016/j.cherd.2019.10.050 ↗
52. 10.1016/0009-2509(61)85030-610.1016/0009-2509(61)85030-6 ↗
53. Graybeal B, , Davis M. Cylinder or cube: strength testing of 80 to 200 MPa (11.6 to 29 ksi) ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J, 2008; 105:603–609.
54. 10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60059-010.1016/S1006-1266(08)60059-0 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.008 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.020 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.08.00410.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.08.004 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00104-X10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00104-X ↗
59. 10.19026/rjaset.7.79610.19026/rjaset.7.796 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.032 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.037 ↗
62. 10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/03501210.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035012 ↗
63. Petzing JN Coupland JM Leach RK. 2010. The measurement of rough surface topography using coherence scanning interferometry. Loughborough University. Report. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/13271 (last accessed May7 2017).
64. Shakor P Nejadi S Gowripalan N. Effect of Heat Curing and E6-Glass Fibre Reinforcement Addition on Powder-Based 3DP Cement Mortar. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_52 ↗
65. JushiUSA. Chopped strands 552B for BMC. http://jushiusa.com/content/chopped-strands-552b (last accessed January4 2019).
66. 10.1055/s-0039-169737610.1055/s-0039-1697376 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10549710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105497 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023 ↗
69. 10.1088/1757-899X/433/1/01207210.1088/1757-899X/433/1/012072 ↗
70. Bredt JF Anderson TC Russell DB. Three dimensional printing material system and method. Google Patents 2003.
71. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:7(459)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:7(459) ↗
72. ACI308R-01. Standard Guide to Curing Concrete. 2001. https://www.techstreet.com/standards/aci-308r-01?product_id=726 (last accessed February21 2018).
73. 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.00510.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.005 ↗
74. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00311-210.1016/S0008-8846(00)00311-2 ↗
75. 10.1007/BF0247345010.1007/BF02473450 ↗
76. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(229)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(229) ↗
77. ACI Committee. ACI330R-01. Guide for Design and Construction of Concrete Parking Lots. 2001. http://www.wef-pe.com/downloads/ACI-330_Design_Guide_for_Concrete_Parking_Lots%5B1%5D.pdf (last accessed February21 2018).
78. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(18)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(18) ↗
79. 10.1007/BF0035454610.1007/BF00354546 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.01.00410.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.01.004 ↗
81. Sonebi M Amziane S Perrot A. Mechanical behavior of 3D printed cement materials. In 3D Printing of Concrete: State of the Art and Challenges of the Digital Construction Revolution. 2019. Wiley-ISTE. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119610755.10.1002/9781119610755.ch4 ↗
82. Cheok G, , Stone W, , Kunnath S. Seismic response of precast concrete frames with hybrid connections. Struct J, 1998; 95:527–539.