journal article·2025-12-12Open access

Hydrogen-bond-driven trigger bond strengthening in CL-20/N8 cocrystal: precise structural prediction for reduced sensitivity and enhanced energy release

Chongwen Jiang, Xiuyuan Li, Zihuan Peng, Zhihong Huang, Nan Li

Publisher page

Abstract

CL-20 is one of the most powerful nitramine-based energetic materials, but its high mechanical sensitivity significantly restricts its practical applications. In this work, the CL-20/N8 (1,1′-azo-1,2,3-triazole) cocrystal system is systematically investigated using first-principles calculations and molecular dynamics simulations to identify the stable supramolecular configuration and optimal cocrystal structure. The results demonstrate that strong and cooperative hydrogen-bond interactions form between CL-20 and N8, which redistribute the local electron density and reinforce the weakest N–NO₂ trigger bond of CL-20. This effect markedly enhances structural stability and effectively reduces sensitivity. Furthermore, the rapid energy-release characteristics of N8 promote a more efficient initiation of CL-20 decomposition, leading to an accelerated and more continuous energy-release process. Compared with simple physical mixtures, the CL-20/N8 cocrystal shows both reduced sensitivity and improved energetic performance, confirming the advantages of hydrogen-bond-regulated cocrystallization. These findings provide molecular-level insight into the stabilization and energy-release mechanisms of the CL-20/N8 system and offer guidance for designing next-generation energetic cocrystals with balanced safety and high performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Crystallography and molecular interactions · Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Institute of Technology

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0360-1285(97)00015-410.1016/S0360-1285(97)00015-4 ↗
2. 10.1080/08927022.2013.84377510.1080/08927022.2013.843775 ↗
3. Asmadi A. 2010. Crystal structure prediction. A molecular modelling study of the solid state behaviour of small organic compounds. University of Bradford.
4. 10.1039/d3cc04445a10.1039/d3cc04445a ↗
5. 10.1107/S002188980401783210.1107/S0021889804017832 ↗
6. 10.1002/ange.20110416410.1002/ange.201104164 ↗
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3757(20000515)112:10<1861:AID-ANGE1861>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/(SICI)1521-3757(20000515)112:10<1861:AID-ANGE1861>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
8. 10.1063/5.008067910.1063/5.0080679 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.19952311110.1002/anie.199523111 ↗
10. 10.1039/C8RA07387B10.1039/C8RA07387B ↗
11. 10.1002/jcc.2606810.1002/jcc.26068 ↗
12. 10.1002/9783527695713.ch310.1002/9783527695713.ch3 ↗
13. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB. 2016. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.
14. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00894-022-05049-310.1007/s00894-022-05049-3 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00214-022-02886-610.1007/s00214-022-02886-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.02710.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.027 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00894-018-3887-110.1007/s00894-018-3887-1 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00214-018-2297-x10.1007/s00214-018-2297-x ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20046036610.1002/anie.200460366 ↗
21. 10.1186/s13065-018-0381-x10.1186/s13065-018-0381-x ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c0083210.1021/acs.cgd.3c00832 ↗
23. Kohlmeyer A Mundy C Mohamed F Schiffmann F. 2004. Cp2k: CP2K Developers Group iterative minimization techniques.
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.02710.1016/j.dt.2021.03.027 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja103525v10.1021/ja103525v ↗
27. 10.7498/aps.65.12610210.7498/aps.65.126102 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11813710.1016/j.actamat.2022.118137 ↗
29. 10.1002/jcc.2288510.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
30. 10.1002/jcc.2681210.1002/jcc.26812 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0369810.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03698 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-810.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-8 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.10627710.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106277 ↗
34. 10.1039/d3cp03091a10.1039/d3cp03091a ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.12010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.120 ↗
36. 10.1021/cg900873t10.1021/cg900873t ↗
37. 10.1016/0009-2614(91)90225-X10.1016/0009-2614(91)90225-X ↗
38. 10.1080/1478644080852049610.1080/14786440808520496 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.01510.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.015 ↗
40. 10.1039/d0ce00602e10.1039/d0ce00602e ↗
41. Shankar U, Gogoi R, Sethi SK. 2022. Introduction to Materials Studio software for the atomistic-scale simulations. Lect Notes Appl Comput Mech. 99:299–313.10.1007/978-981-19-3092-8_15 ↗
42. 10.1039/c4ta01150c10.1039/c4ta01150c ↗
43. 10.1016/j.dt.2015.11.00210.1016/j.dt.2015.11.002 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ces.2014.08.05810.1016/j.ces.2014.08.058 ↗
45. 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.06.01110.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.06.011 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0828610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08286 ↗
47. Xiao JJ, Zhu WH, Zhu W, Xiao HM. 2013. Molecular dynamics of energetic materials. In: Xiao HM and Xiao JJ, editors. Science Press.
48. 10.1007/s11426-007-0141-610.1007/s11426-007-0141-6 ↗
49. 10.1080/07370652.2023.223661710.1080/07370652.2023.2236617 ↗
50. 10.1088/0965-0393/24/8/08500810.1088/0965-0393/24/8/085008 ↗
51. 10.1039/d3ja00283g10.1039/d3ja00283g ↗