journal article·2024-12-28Open access

Synthesis and investigation into explosive sensitivity for a series of new picramide explosives

Nicholas Lease, Kyle D. Spielvogel, M. J. Cawkwell, Virginia W. Manner

Abstract

Tailoring the molecular properties that govern energetic material sensitivity is essential to improve safety and help develop new energetic materials. Despite this need, understanding the complex chemistry and physics of explosive initiation and propagation is still a challenge. Recent work by our group has reinforced the view that explosive sensitivity under sub-shock conditions is connected to the strength of the weakest covalent bond in the molecule, that is, its “trigger linkage.” These correlations have been observed with different classes of energetic molecules and indicate that “trigger linkage” bond breaking, and heat of explosion are good indicators for the sensitivity trends. Herein we report the synthesis of aliphatic energetic materials with ethane, propane and neopentane backbones. Experimental and computational studies show that the trigger linkage model, based on results from quantum molecular dynamics simulations, correctly predicts trends observed in the impact sensitivity of the molecules. However, while the model predicts the impact sensitivities of the ethane series, the neopentane series has higher impact sensitivities than predicted, which is presumably influenced by crystal packing effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Crystallography and molecular interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

High Explosives Science and Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA

Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.9b0696110.1021/jacs.9b06961 ↗
2. 10.1002/1521-4087(200204)27:2<49:AID-PREP49>3.0.CO;2-410.1002/1521-4087(200204)27:2<49:AID-PREP49>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
3. 10.1080/0737065910801863110.1080/07370659108018631 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0085310.1021/acs.cgd.9b00853 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0031210.1021/acs.jcim.1c00312 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c0002210.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00022 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c0002210.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00022 ↗
8. Cawkwell M. J. S. R. Ferreira N. Lease and V. W. Manner. 2021. Ranking Explosive Sensitivity with Chemical Kinetics Derived from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Cambridge Massachusetts: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-822971-2.00007-3 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.506338510.1063/1.5063385 ↗
10. Cooper, P. W. 1996. Explosives engineering. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley VCH Inc.
11. Dennis, W. H., D. H. Rosenblatt, W. G. Blucher, and C. L. Coon. 1975. Improved synthesis of TNT isomers. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 2:202–03.10.1021/je60065a016 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.35757610.1063/1.357576 ↗
13. 10.1039/D2CP05339J10.1039/D2CP05339J ↗
14. 10.1016/j.inoche.2010.06.01810.1016/j.inoche.2010.06.018 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.132988910.1063/1.1329889 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.726010.1103/PhysRevB.58.7260 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.29110.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.291 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00706-020-02690-710.1007/s00706-020-02690-7 ↗
20. Hiskey, M. A. C., E. David, D. L. Naud, S. F. Son, H. L. Berghout, and C. A. Bolme. 2000. Progress in high-nitrogen chemistry in explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics. Proceedings of the International Pyrotechnics Seminar, July 16-21, 2000, Grand Junction, Colorado USA, 27, 3–14.
21. Kamlet, M. J. 1960. Sensitivity relationships. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Detonation, Office of Naval Research, Princeton NJ, 671–692.
22. Kamlet, M. J. 1976a. The relationship of impact sensitivity wih structure of organic high explosives. I. polynitroaliphatic explosives. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium (International) on Detonation, Coronado, California, 312. Office of Naval Research.
23. Kamlet, M. J. 1976b. The relationship of impact sensitivity with structure of organic high explosives. 1. Polynitroaliphatic explosives. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium (International) on Detonation, Coronado, California, 312.
24. 10.1002/prep.1979004020410.1002/prep.19790040204 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c0264710.1021/acs.jpca.0c02647 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp905969y10.1021/jp905969y ↗
27. LATTE. 2010. LATTE. Los Alamos NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory. https://github.com/lanl/LATTE.
28. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0106210.1021/acs.cgd.9b01062 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0270110.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02701 ↗
30. 10.1039/D3SC01627G10.1039/D3SC01627G ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12291010.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122910 ↗
32. 10.1021/cg501048v10.1021/cg501048v ↗
33. 10.1039/C8SC00903A10.1039/C8SC00903A ↗
34. 10.1021/cg501362b10.1021/cg501362b ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0115410.1021/acs.jcim.2c01154 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0629410.1021/acs.iecr.0c06294 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.491754610.1063/1.4917546 ↗
38. Mathieu, D. 2022. Molecular modeling of the sensitivities of energetic materials. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Elsevier.
39. 10.1002/prep.20240001410.1002/prep.202400014 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41598-023-47952-610.1038/s41598-023-47952-6 ↗
41. 10.1080/0026897090274437510.1080/00268970902744375 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0015910.1021/acs.cgd.7b00159 ↗
43. 10.1021/ci950223m10.1021/ci950223m ↗
44. 10.1080/00401706.1994.1048540110.1080/00401706.1994.10485401 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.12300410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.123004 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.314807510.1063/1.3148075 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0166-1280(96)04673-810.1016/S0166-1280(96)04673-8 ↗
48. 10.1016/s0166-1280(96)04673-810.1016/s0166-1280(96)04673-8 ↗
49. 10.1080/0026897950010198110.1080/00268979500101981 ↗
50. 10.1016/0022-2860(95)09066-510.1016/0022-2860(95)09066-5 ↗
51. Politzer, P., and J. S. Murray. 2014. Chapter one - detonation performance and sensitivity: A quest for balance. In Advances in quantum chemistry, ed. J. R. Sabin, vol. 69, 1–30. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
52. 10.1007/s00894-015-2578-410.1007/s00894-015-2578-4 ↗
53. 10.1002/prep.20150034910.1002/prep.201500349 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11224-015-0702-910.1007/s11224-015-0702-9 ↗
55. 10.1088/1742-6596/500/5/05203710.1088/1742-6596/500/5/052037 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp012602q10.1021/jp012602q ↗
57. 10.1016/S0166-1280(01)00782-510.1016/S0166-1280(01)00782-5 ↗
58. 10.1055/s-0035-156147410.1055/s-0035-1561474 ↗
59. 10.1002/prep.20060004210.1002/prep.200600042 ↗
60. Storm, C. B., J. R. Stine, and J. F. Kramer. 1989. Sensitivity relationships in energetic materials. In Chemistry and physics of energetic materials, NATO advanced science institutes series, series c, mathematical and physical sciences, ed. S. N. Bulusu, 605–639. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
61. 10.1039/C7CE01914A10.1039/C7CE01914A ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R1398510.1103/PhysRevB.57.R13985 ↗
63. Voter, A. F. 2007. Introduction to the kinetic Monte Carlo method. In Radiation effects in solids, NATO science series II, ed. K. E. Sickafus, E. A. Kotomin, and B. P. Uberuaga, 1–23. Dordrecht: Springer.
64. Wang, X., Y. He, X. Zhang, M. Hu, W. Zhao, H. Sun, X. Yang, X. Liu, and R. Liu. 2024. Interpretable-machine-learning-guided discovery of dominant intrinsic factors of sensitivity of high explosives. Materials Advances 5 (9):3921–28.10.1039/D4MA00152D ↗
65. 10.1002/prep.20140019610.1002/prep.201400196 ↗
66. 10.1021/je700617n10.1021/je700617n ↗
67. 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00787-010.1016/S0040-6031(01)00787-0 ↗
68. 10.1080/07370652.2019.163415910.1080/07370652.2019.1634159 ↗
69. 10.1002/prep.20150035110.1002/prep.201500351 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0092910.1021/acs.cgd.8b00929 ↗
71. 10.1021/cg301353f10.1021/cg301353f ↗
72. 10.1021/ja065862010.1021/ja0658620 ↗