journal article·2023-12-01Open access

Flexural Properties of Periodic Lattice Structured Lightweight Cantilever Beams Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing: Experimental and Finite Element Methods

Aamer Nazir, Ahmed Gohar, Shang-Chih Lin, Jeng-Ywan Jeng

Abstract

Lattice structures are a type of lightweight structure that is more commonly being applied to engineering systems as a way to reduce mass and enhance mechanical properties. The cantilever beam case is one of the primary modes of loading in many engineering applications, where light-weighting is also crucial. However, lightweight lattice structured cantilever beams have not been investigated considerably due to design and manufacturing limitations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the response of four different lattice structured cantilever beams comprising of unit cells made from Schwarz-P, Schwarz-D, Gyroid, and Octet-truss structures fabricated using Multi Jet Fusion additive manufacturing technology. An investigation into the cross-sections of these structures leads to a conclusion that the beams made from such structures are non-prismatic in nature as a result of variation in cross-sections. This led to the development of equations for the moment of inertia of these structures, which helped in calculating symmetric and un-symmetric bending. These beams were subjected to cantilever loading until failure, which provided insights into flexural properties such as flexural stress, stiffness, and strain energy. Experimental results indicate that the surface-based structures, due to better surface-area-to-volume ratio, have better ability in transferring loads and hence perform better than the beam-based Octet-truss beam. The Schwarz-D beam had performed the best among all the beams, which is further supported in literature due to its stretch-dominated topology that results in higher values of modulus. The finite element analysis (FEA) findings also validate these findings in which the distribution of stresses can be seen to be better transmitted than the other structures. The FEA validation shows that the distribution of Von-Mises stress and their position in experimental tests and failure of these structures is also very close, which provides validation to the experimental setup and the testing of beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

High Speed 3D Printing Research Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

President Office, LungHwa University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson I (Ian) Rosen DW (David W) Stucker B (Brent). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. New York NY: Springer 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 ↗
2. Robbins J, , Owen SJ, , Clark BW, et al. An efficient and scalable approach for generating topologically optimized cellular structures for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2016; 12:296–304.
3. 10.1007/s00158-012-0844-y10.1007/s00158-012-0844-y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.18010.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.180 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.01510.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.015 ↗
6. Brackett D Ashcroft I Hague R. Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Solid Freeform Fabricat Symp 2011:348–362. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/88361
7. Thomas DS Gilbert SW. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review and Discussion. USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1176.pdf
8. 10.1016/j.cad.2016.07.00610.1016/j.cad.2016.07.006 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-019-04085-310.1007/s00170-019-04085-3 ↗
10. Low JM Govdeli Y Ravindrababu S et al. On the Comparison of Diamond Honeycomb and 3D-Kagome Structures for 3D Printed UAVs. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University 2018; pp. 341–346.
11. Rodriguez J. Porsche's 3D-Printed EV Parts Look So Damn Cool. New York USA: Jalopnik. https://jalopnik.com/porsches-3d-printed-ev-parts-look-so-damn-cool-1845940403
12. 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.00210.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.01510.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.05210.1016/j.arth.2020.01.052 ↗
15. 10.3390/pr801002510.3390/pr8010025 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1208174010.3390/polym12081740 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831771453110.1177/0021998317714531 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.10310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.103 ↗
19. Qingye J Kang DS Jeong HS et al. Lightweight design of multi-lattice structures and evaluation of its mechanical properties by quarter compression test. In: The 8th International Conference on Manufacturing Machine Design and Tribology. Kagoshima Japan: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 2019. https://imagineering.pusan.ac.kr/imagineering/29207/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGdGhlc2lzJTJGaW1hZ2luZWVyaW5nJTJGOTMlMkYzMDU4JTJGdmlldy5kbyUzRg%3D%3D
20. 10.3390/ma1224413410.3390/ma12244134 ↗
21. 10.1177/109963620910453610.1177/1099636209104536 ↗
22. Han Y Lu WF. Optimization design of nonuniform cellular structures for additive manufacturing. In: ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference MSEC 2018; 1. Texas USA: College Station. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/MSEC/proceedings-abstract/MSEC2018/51357/V001T01A033/277759
23. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00810.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008 ↗
24. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-006910.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0069 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10221410.1016/j.addma.2021.102214 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11040710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110407 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
28. Nieto DM, , Sánchez DM. Design for additive manufacturing: Tool review and a case study. Appl Sci (Switzerland), 2021; 11:1–13.
29. Next-Generation Engineering Design Software | nTopology. https://ntopology.com/ (accessed June26 2021).
30. 10.1007/s00170-020-06227-410.1007/s00170-020-06227-4 ↗
31. HP. HP Jet Fusion 3D 4200 Printing Solution. 2018. https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=4AA6-4892ENA (accessed December21 2018).
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.03510.1016/j.addma.2018.05.035 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.00310.1016/j.addma.2017.08.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.02810.1016/j.addma.2018.06.028 ↗
35. Ansys | Engineering Simulation Software. https://www.ansys.com/ (accessed May25 2021).
36. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.09.02610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.09.026 ↗
37. Dassault Systems. Solidworks. 2018. https://www.solidworks.com/ (accessed June18 2019).