journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Cost Model Framework for Pieces Additively Manufactured in Fused Deposition Modeling for Low to Medium Batches

Mario Enrique Hernandez Korner, Maria Pilar Lamban, Jose Antonio Albajez, Jorge Santolaria, Lisbeth del Carmen Ng Corrales, Jesús Royo

Abstract

The cost impact of implementing additive manufacturing (AM) in the fabrication process is nowadays an issue. The scope of this research is to establish a cost model framework that can predict the cost of a piece in a low to medium batch considering fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing parameters. Every enterprise wants to increase its internal capabilities for tools, prototypes, and the production of pieces for maintenance purposes. FDM is an AM technology increasingly used in aerospace, automotive, and many other sectors. The research methodology consists of developing a cost model based on the extrusion-type AM process for any given machine characteristics and comparing the cost per piece based on diverse lot sizes and raw materials. Two test cases were simulated to show the usefulness of the cost model, one with a conventional polymer material (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) and another with a high-performance material (polyetheretherketone); materials with very different costs, machine technical requirements, and energy consumption. The framework could be used to predict the best machine size and material type that could be suitable for a certain situation. The strength of our approach lies in the energy cost calculus, which is dependent on machine capabilities and size.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Design and Manufacturing Engineering Department, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Withdrawn 2015) [Internet]. Astm.org. 2022. Available at https://www.astm.org/f2792-12a.html (last accessed on March15 2021).
2. 10.3390/met1008106110.3390/met10081061 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
4. 10.3390/app916331610.3390/app9163316 ↗
5. 10.1243/09544060376255459610.1243/095440603762554596 ↗
6. 10.1243/09544054JEM51710.1243/09544054JEM517 ↗
7. 10.1108/1355254101106570410.1108/13552541011065704 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-017-0492-x10.1007/s00170-017-0492-x ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254081090793810.1108/13552540810907938 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.02310.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.023 ↗
11. 10.1108/1355254131131220110.1108/13552541311312201 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.01510.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.10753210.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107532 ↗
14. 10.3390/su1301031910.3390/su13010319 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.04.00310.1016/j.cirpj.2021.04.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.48410.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x10.1007/s11665-018-3784-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
19. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2015-012310.1108/RPJ-09-2015-0123 ↗
20. 10.1080/0020754060062252210.1080/00207540600622522 ↗
21. Ultimaker Cura: software de impresión 3D potente y fácil de usar | Ultimaker [Internet]. ultimaker.com. 2022. Available at https://ultimaker.com/es/software/ultimaker-cura ( last accessed on March21 2021).
22. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.15310.1016/j.procir.2016.11.153 ↗
23. Baumers M, , Tuck C, , Wildman R, et al. Transparency built-in: Energy consumption and cost estimation for additive manufacturing Baumers et al. energy and cost estimation for additive manufacturing. J Ind Ecol, 2013; 17:418–431.
24. 10.3390/aerospace708011010.3390/aerospace7080110 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.00710.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.007 ↗
26. 10.1243/09544070JAUTO30910.1243/09544070JAUTO309 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.09.00710.1016/j.jmsy.2019.09.007 ↗
28. Freeman B. Cost estimation of CNC vs composite reinforced FDM3D printing for low-volume production of motorcycle components. Am J Eng Sci Technol, 2020; 6:1–13.
29. Savolainen J Collan M. Quantifying the economic feasibility of additive manufacturing: Simulating production lifetimes in the context of spare parts production. In: Collan M Michelsen K ed. Technical Economic and Societal Effects of Manufacturing 40 [Internet] 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2020 pp. 149–167. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46103-4_8 (last accessed on August14 2020).10.1007/978-3-030-46103-4_8 ↗
30. 10.1108/1741038101106399610.1108/17410381011063996 ↗
31. Lindemann C, , Jahnke U, , Moi M, et al. Impact and influence factors of additive manufacturing on product lifecycle costs. Solid Freeform Fabr Symp Proc, 2013; 998–1009.
32. 10.1515/eng-2019-007310.1515/eng-2019-0073 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.14510.1016/j.procir.2014.03.145 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00170-019-03394-x10.1007/s00170-019-03394-x ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1223398210.3390/ma12233982 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.12.00110.1016/j.jmsy.2017.12.001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.06.00510.1016/j.jmsy.2018.06.005 ↗
38. 10.1111/jiec.1263710.1111/jiec.12637 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.01.00210.1016/j.cirpj.2018.01.002 ↗
40. 10.1108/1355254061063724610.1108/13552540610637246 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00170-019-04409-310.1007/s00170-019-04409-3 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.17110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.171 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.clet.2021.10006810.1016/j.clet.2021.100068 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10112010.1016/j.addma.2020.101120 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.002 ↗
46. 10.1504/IJMR.2017.08365110.1504/IJMR.2017.083651 ↗
47. 10.1007/s40684-014-0033-010.1007/s40684-014-0033-0 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.02910.1016/j.procir.2014.06.029 ↗
49. Luo Y, , Ji Z, , Leu MC, et al. Environmental performance analysis of solid freeform fabrication processes. IEEE Int Symp Electron Environ, 1999; 1–6.
50. 10.3390/ma1224416110.3390/ma12244161 ↗
51. Roy R Harrington J. Cost Engineering: Why what and how? Decis Eng Rep Ser 2003. Available at https://www.cranfield.ac.uk (last accessed on June23 2021).
52. Hansen DR Mowen MM Heitger DL. Cost Management 5th ed. In: Cengage Learning ed. Cengage Learning 2021 1136 p. Available at https://books.google.es/books?id=HhQcEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA28&hl=es&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=false (last accessed on June25 2021).
53. 10.1115/1.403920110.1115/1.4039201 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.03610.1016/j.jmapro.2020.08.036 ↗
55. 10.1177/095440541140604410.1177/0954405411406044 ↗
56. Ultimaker S5: Reliability at scale [Internet]. ultimaker.com. 2022. Available at https://ultimaker.com/3d-printers/ultimaker-s5 (last accessed on March21 2021).
57. Henan Suwei Electronics Technology co. CreatBot 3D Printer User manual 2017 p. 40. Available at https://www.creatbot.com/en/peek-300.htm (last accessed on June15 2021).
58. E3-95 AS, , TM D638-14. Standard practice for preparation of metallographic specimens. ASTM Int, 2016; 82(C):1–15.
59. Economic Research Institute. Salary Expert Powered by ERI [Internet] 2021. Available at https://www.salaryexpert.com/salary/job/operator-manufacturing/spain (last accessed on September15 2021).
60. 3D4Makers. PEEK Filament Technical Data Sheet [Internet] 2018. Available at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0762/2839/files/TDS_PEEK_Filament_1.pdf?5159116558357548495 (last accessed on April20 2021).
61. Raise3D. Raise3D Premium ABS Technical Data Sheet. Vol. 3 2017. Available at https://www.raise3d.com/products/r3d-premium-abs-filament/ (last accessed on June15 2021).
62. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.05810.1016/j.energy.2016.03.058 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.10035610.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100356 ↗
64. Nasta M. Electricity as key to economic regeneration [Internet]. Hdl.handle.net. 2022. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10902/23075 (last accessed on December28 2021).
65. Balogun VA, , Kirkwood N, , Mativenga PT. Energy consumption and carbon footprint analysis of Fused Deposition Modelling: A case study of RP Stratasys Dimension SST FDM. Int J Sci Eng Res, 2015; 6:442–447.
66. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-010110.1515/ntrev-2020-0101 ↗
67. Lindermann C Jahnke U Moi M et al. Analyzing Product Lifecycle Costs for a Better Understanding of Cost Drivers in Additive Manufacturing. 2012 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15341 (last accessed on July23 2020).