journal article·2014-06

Molecular Dynamics Study of Mechanical Properties of β-Zn4Sb3 Nanowires: Temperature, Strain Rate, and Size Effect

Guodong Li, Yao Li, Gang Chen, Qingjie Zhang, Lisheng Liu, Pengcheng Zhai

Journal of Electronic Materials· Volume 43· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Recent experimental studies reveal that β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires have greater potential commercial application compared with conventional bulk materials. Mechanical stability of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires is an important foundation for their commercial application. In the present work, mechanical properties of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires are studied by using the molecular dynamics method, which theoretically reveals the influence mechanism of various effects (temperature, strain rate, and size effect) on the mechanical behavior of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires. The simulation results show that mechanical properties of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires decrease remarkably compared with bulk β-Zn4Sb3. Due to the disordered Zn atoms in β-Zn4Sb3, mechanical properties of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires show a weak temperature softening effect, weak strain rate hardening effect, and slight size dependence. The present simulations of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires represent a fundamental study and shed light on the understanding of the essential mechanical behavior of β-Zn4Sb3 nanowires.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · ZnO doping and properties · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. G.J. Snyder and E.S. Toberer, Nat. Mater. 7, 105 (2008).10.1038/nmat2090 ↗
2. S.Y. Wang, H. Li, D.K. Qi, W.J. Xie, and X.F. Tang, Acta Mater. 59, 4805 (2011).10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.023 ↗
3. S. Bhattacharya, R.P. Hermann, V. Keppens, T.M. Tritt, and G.J. Snyder, Phys. Rev. B 74, 134108 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.134108 ↗
4. F. Cargnoni, E. Nishibori, P. Rabiller, L. Bertini, G.J. Snyder, M. Christensen, C. Gatti, and B.B. Iversen, Chem. Eur. J. 10, 3861 (2004).10.1002/chem.200400327 ↗
5. G.J. Snyder, M. Christensen, E. Nishibori, T. Caillat, and B.B. Iversen, Nat. Mater. 3, 458 (2004).10.1038/nmat1154 ↗
6. C.W. Cheng and H.J. Fan, Nano Today 7, 327 (2012).10.1016/j.nantod.2012.06.002 ↗
7. Y.B. Liu, S.M. Zhou, X.Y. Yuan, S.Y. Lou, T. Gao, X.J. Shi, and X.P. Wu, Mater. Lett. 84, 116 (2012).10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.046 ↗
8. B. Qiu and X.L. Ruan, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165203 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165203 ↗
9. B. Qiu, L. Sun, and X.L. Ruan, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035312 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035312 ↗
10. X.Q. Yang, A. Zhou, L.S. Liu, Q.J. Zhang, and P.C. Zhai, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 1714 (2010).10.1007/s11664-010-1203-7 ↗
11. X.Q. Yang, P.C. Zhai, L.S. Liu, and Q.J. Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 123517 (2011).10.1063/1.3598116 ↗
12. H.W. Mayer, I. Mikhail, and K. Schubert, J. Less Common Met. 59, 43 (1978).10.1016/0022-5088(78)90109-1 ↗
13. G.D. Li, Y. Li, L.S. Liu, Q.J. Zhang, and P.C. Zhai, Mater. Res. Bull. 47, 3558 (2012).10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.059 ↗
14. G.D. Li, Y. Li, Q.J. Zhang, L.S. Liu, and P.C. Zhai, J. Electron. Mater. 42, 1514 (2013).10.1007/s11664-012-2305-1 ↗
15. http://lammps.sandia.gov
16. W.C. Swope, H.C. Andersen, P.H. Berens, and K.R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982).10.1063/1.442716 ↗
17. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
18. H. Ikeda, Y. Qi, T. Cagin, K. Samwer, W.L. Johnson, and W.A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2900 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2900 ↗