Emerging nano-scale delivery systems for the treatment of osteoporosis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Osteoporosis is a pathological condition characterized by an accelerated bone resorption rate, resulting in decreased bone density and increased susceptibility to fractures, particularly among the elderly population. While conventional treatments for osteoporosis have shown efficacy, they are associated with certain limitations, including limited drug bioavailability, non-specific administration, and the occurrence of adverse effects. In recent years, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have emerged as a promising approach for managing osteoporosis. Nanoparticles possess unique physicochemical properties, such as a small size, large surface area-to-volume ratio, and tunable surface characteristics, which enable them to overcome the limitations of conventional therapies. These nanoparticles offer several advantages, including enhanced drug stability, controlled release kinetics, targeted bone tissue delivery, and improved drug bioavailability. This comprehensive review aims to provide insights into the recent advancements in nanoparticle-based therapy for osteoporosis. It elucidates the various types of nanoparticles employed in this context, including silica, polymeric, solid lipid, and metallic nanoparticles, along with their specific processing techniques and inherent properties that render them suitable as potential drug carriers for osteoporosis treatment. Furthermore, this review discusses the challenges and future suggestions associated with the development and translation of nanoparticle drug delivery systems for clinical use. These challenges encompass issues such as scalability, safety assessment, and regulatory considerations. However, despite these challenges, the utilization of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems holds immense promise in revolutionizing the field of osteoporosis management by enabling more effective and targeted therapies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone health and osteoporosis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.
ATEMs, Seoul 05836, Republic of Korea.
Funding
Ministry of Science and ICT · Ministry of Heath and Welfare · Ministry of Health and Welfare
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ph1104010710.3390/ph11040107 ↗
2. Rodan GA. Introduction to bone biology. Volume 13. Bone; 1992. pp. S3–S6.10.1016/S8756-3282(09)80003-3 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00018-010-0479-310.1007/s00018-010-0479-3 ↗
4. 10.1248/cpb.c20-0001710.1248/cpb.c20-00017 ↗
5. Gu W Wu C Chen J Xiao Y. 2013. Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration. Int J Nanomed pp.2305–17.10.2147/IJN.S44393 ↗
6. Pouresmaeili F Kamalidehghan B Kamarehei M Goh YM. A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Therapeutics and clinical risk management; 2018. pp. 2029–49.10.2147/TCRM.S138000 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.00710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.007 ↗
8. Johnston CB, Dagar M. Osteoporosis in older adults. Med Clin. 2020;104(5):873–84.
9. 10.1002/jbmr.226910.1002/jbmr.2269 ↗
10. Hoque J Shih YRV Zeng Y Newman H Sangaj N Arjunji N Varghese S. 2021. Bone targeting nanocarrier-assisted delivery of adenosine to combat osteoporotic bone loss. Biomaterials 273 p.120819.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120819 ↗
11. Li L Wang Z. 2018. Ovarian aging and osteoporosis. Aging and aging-related diseases: mechanisms and interventions pp.199–215.10.1007/978-981-13-1117-8_13 ↗
12. 10.3390/ijms2112427410.3390/ijms21124274 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.02110.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.021 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0145510.1021/acsabm.0c01455 ↗
15. 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.01610.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.016 ↗
16. 10.1111/jocn.1343010.1111/jocn.13430 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat377610.1038/nmat3776 ↗
18. Figueiredo A Silva O Cabrita S. 2012. Inflammatory reaction post implantation of bone graft materials. Exp Pathol Health Sci 6(1) pp.15 – 8.
19. 10.1177/1759720X1773256210.1177/1759720X17732562 ↗
20. 10.1186/s40824-022-00301-610.1186/s40824-022-00301-6 ↗
21. Zhang Z Zhao J Chen Z Wu H Wang S. A molybdenum-based nanoplatform with multienzyme mimicking capacities for oxidative stress-induced acute liver injury treatment. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers; 2023.10.1039/D2QI02318K ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00021-210.1016/S0169-409X(02)00021-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0945-053X(03)00083-010.1016/S0945-053X(03)00083-0 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5TB00900F10.1039/C5TB00900F ↗
26. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.031310.1089/ten.tea.2014.0313 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.026 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.012 ↗
29. Melville AJ, Rodríguez-Lorenzo LM, Forsythe JS. Effects of calcination temperature on the drug delivery behaviour of Ibuprofen from hydroxyapatite powders. J Mater Science: Mater Med. 2008;19:1187–95. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXis1Wgsbw%3D
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.08110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.081 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.01710.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.017 ↗
32. 10.1021/am400069410.1021/am4000694 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00366-110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00366-1 ↗
34. 10.1186/s12951-018-0392-810.1186/s12951-018-0392-8 ↗
35. 10.1039/C5TB00900F10.1039/C5TB00900F ↗
36. Liechty WB Kryscio DR Slaughter BV Peppas NA Reis C. CP. Recent advances in drug delivery systems. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2011;2:510.
37. 10.1186/s40824-021-00231-910.1186/s40824-021-00231-9 ↗
38. 10.4236/jbnb.2011.22506210.4236/jbnb.2011.225062 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.00510.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.005 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.01710.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.017 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40005-019-00443-110.1007/s40005-019-00443-1 ↗
42. 10.2217/nnm-2016-030510.2217/nnm-2016-0305 ↗
43. 10.1007/s13770-021-00416-210.1007/s13770-021-00416-2 ↗
44. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-21571410.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215714 ↗
45. Borciani G Ciapetti G Vitale-Brovarone C Baldini N. 2022. Strontium functionalization of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering purposes: a biological point of view. Materials 15(5) p.1724.10.3390/ma15051724 ↗
46. Lee NH Kang MS Kim TH Yoon DS Mandakhbayar N Jo SB Kim HS Knowles JC Lee JH Kim HW. 2021. Dual actions of osteoclastic-inhibition and osteogenic-stimulation through strontium-releasing bioactive nanoscale cement imply biomaterial-enabled osteoporosis therapy. Biomaterials 276 p.121025.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121025 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.03810.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.038 ↗
48. Kou Y Li C Yang P Li D Lu X Liu H Li M. 2021. The W9 peptide inhibits osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activity by downregulating osteoclast autophagy and promoting osteoclast apoptosis. J Mol Histol pp.1–12.10.1007/s10735-021-10030-0 ↗
49. 10.1007/s11010-014-2318-610.1007/s11010-014-2318-6 ↗
50. 10.2174/187432500090301001410.2174/1874325000903010014 ↗
51. 10.1177/204062231037478310.1177/2040622310374783 ↗
52. Erlacher L, Kettenbach J, Kiener H, Graninger W, Kainberger F, Pietschmann P. Salmon calcitonin and calcium in the treatment of male osteoporosis: the effect on bone mineral density. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. 1997;109(8):270–4. 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjtFyjsLs%3D
53. 10.1038/s41584-019-0288-510.1038/s41584-019-0288-5 ↗
54. Manolagas SC O’brien CA Almeida M. 2013. The role of estrogen and androgen receptors in bone health and disease. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 9(12) p.699.10.1038/nrendo.2013.179 ↗
55. Hatefi M Ahmadi MRH Rahmani A Dastjerdi MM Asadollahi K. Effects of curcumin on bone loss and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with spinal cord injury. Volume 114. World neurosurgery; 2018. pp. e785–91.10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.081 ↗
56. Wang Z Wang D Yang D Zhen W Zhang J Peng S. The effect of icariin on bone metabolism and its potential clinical application. Volume 29. Osteoporosis International; 2018. pp. 535–44.10.1007/s00198-017-4255-1 ↗
57. Wong SK Chin KY Ima-Nirwana S. 2020. Quercetin as an agent for protecting the bone: a review of the current evidence. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(17) p.6448.10.3390/ijms21176448 ↗
58. 10.1177/1759720X1558090310.1177/1759720X15580903 ↗
59. Ehrlich PJ Lanyon LE. 2002. Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review. Osteoporosis international 13(9) p.688.10.1007/s001980200095 ↗
60. 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90274-910.1016/0002-9343(87)90274-9 ↗
61. Karunaratne DN. 2007. Nanotechnology in medicine. J Natl Sci Foundation Sri Lanka 35(3).10.4038/jnsfsr.v35i3.2012 ↗
62. 10.1002/anie.20046059810.1002/anie.200460598 ↗
63. Mora-Raimundo P Lozano D Benito M Mulero F Manzano M Vallet‐Regí M. 2021. Osteoporosis remission and new bone formation with mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Advanced Science 8(16) p.2101107.10.1002/advs.202101107 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0180410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01804 ↗
65. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0029010.3389/fchem.2019.00290 ↗
66. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<422::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-#10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<422::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
67. 10.1002/jbmr.565007110710.1002/jbmr.5650071107 ↗
68. Rahman IA Padavettan V. 2012. Synthesis of silica nanoparticles by sol-gel: size-dependent properties surface modification and applications in silica-polymer nanocomposites—a review. Journal of nanomaterials 2012 pp.8–8.10.1155/2012/132424 ↗
69. Beck Jr GR Ha SW Camalier CE Yamaguchi M Li Y Lee JK Weitzmann MN. 2012. Bioactive silica-based nanoparticles stimulate bone-forming osteoblasts suppress bone-resorbing osteoclasts and enhance bone mineral density in vivo. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine 8(6) pp.793–803.10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.003 ↗
70. Qi GB Gao YJ Wang L Wang H. 2018. Self-assembled peptide‐based nanomaterials for biomedical imaging and therapy. Advanced Materials 30(22) p.1703444.10.1002/adma.201703444 ↗
71. 10.1039/C7CS00877E10.1039/C7CS00877E ↗
72. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2019.08.00810.1016/j.mtchem.2019.08.008 ↗
73. 10.1002/jbm.82007030410.1002/jbm.820070304 ↗
74. Gambacciani M, Vacca F. Postmenopausal osteoporosis and hormone replacement therapy. Minerva Med. 2004;95(6):507–20. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7lt1aqtQ%3D%3D
75. 10.1039/C8NR05268A10.1039/C8NR05268A ↗
76. 10.1021/am400102410.1021/am4001024 ↗
77. 10.1021/nl052024f10.1021/nl052024f ↗
78. 10.1021/ac102826k10.1021/ac102826k ↗
79. 10.1021/nn204806910.1021/nn2048069 ↗
80. 10.1039/C4RA16265J10.1039/C4RA16265J ↗
81. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.02910.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.029 ↗
82. 10.1038/s42255-019-0053-810.1038/s42255-019-0053-8 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.11.01910.1016/j.ymthe.2018.11.019 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.12143810.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121438 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.00810.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.008 ↗
87. Oh S Daraio C Chen LH Pisanic TR Finones RR Jin S. 2006. Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A: an Official Journal of the Society for Biomaterials The Japanese Society for Biomaterials and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 78(1) pp.97–103.10.1002/jbm.a.30722 ↗
88. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomedical Mater Res Part A: Official J Soc Biomaterials. 2010;92(3):1218–24.10.1002/jbm.a.32463 ↗
89. 10.3390/surfaces504003310.3390/surfaces5040033 ↗
90. Mu C Hu Y Huang L Shen X Li M Li L Gu H Yu Y Xia Z Cai K. 2018. Sustained raloxifene release from hyaluronan-alendronate-functionalized titanium nanotube arrays capable of enhancing osseointegration in osteoporotic rabbits. Materials Science and Engineering: C 82 pp.345–353.10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.056 ↗
91. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.016510.1089/ten.tea.2009.0165 ↗
92. Yang J Fang K Xu K Shen X Xu X. 2023. Effect of zinc or copper doping on corrosion resistance and anti-oxidative stress of strontium-based micro-arc oxidation coatings on titanium. Applied Surface Science 626 p.157229.10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157229 ↗
93. 10.1177/088532822199799810.1177/0885328221997998 ↗
94. Hsiao CY Chen TH Chu TH Ting YN Tsai PJ Shyu JF. 2020. Calcitonin induces bone formation by increasing expression of Wnt10b in osteoclasts in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rats. Frontiers in Endocrinology 11 p.613.10.3389/fendo.2020.00613 ↗
95. Lai M Yan X Shen K Tang Q Fang X Zhang C Zhu Z Hou Y. 2020. The effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide functionalized TiO2 nanotubes on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 600 p.124899.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124899 ↗
96. Hengst V Oussoren C Kissel T Storm G. 2007. Bone targeting potential of bisphosphonate-targeted liposomes: Preparation characterization and hydroxyapatite binding in vitro. International journal of pharmaceutics 331(2) pp.224–227.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.11.024 ↗
97. Lara-Ochoa S Ortega-Lara W Guerrero-Beltrán CE. 2021. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in drug delivery: physicochemistry and applications. Pharmaceutics 13(10) p.1642.10.3390/pharmaceutics13101642 ↗
98. Okada M Furuzono T. 2012. Hydroxylapatite nanoparticles: fabrication methods and medical applications. Science and technology of advanced materials 13(6) p.064103.10.1088/1468-6996/13/6/064103 ↗
99. Oryan A Sahvieh S. Effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporosis: focus on zoledronate. Volume 264. Life Sciences; 2021. p. 118681.10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118681 ↗
100. Khajuria DK Razdan R Mahapatra DR. 2015. Development in vitro and in vivo characterization of zoledronic acid functionalized hydroxyapatite nanoparticle based formulation for treatment of osteoporosis in animal model. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 66 pp.173–183.10.1016/j.ejps.2014.10.015 ↗