A fully ingrowing implant for cranial reconstruction: Results in critical size defects in sheep using 3D-printed titanium scaffold
Source abstract
Abstract
Current alloplastic materials such as PMMA, titanium or PEEK don't show relevant bone ingrowth into the implant when used for cranioplasty, ceramic implants have the drawback being brittle. New materials and implant designs are urgently needed being biocompatible, stable enough for cranioplasty and stimulating bone formation. In an in vivo critical size sheep model circular cranial defects (>2.4 cm) were covered with three different types of a 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds with multidirectional, stochastically distributed architecture (uncoated scaffold, hydroxyapatite-coated scaffold, uncoated scaffold filled with a calcium phosphate bone cement paste containing β-TCP granules). An empty titanium mesh served as control. Among the different investigated setups the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffolds showed a surprisingly favourable performance. Push-out tests revealed a 2.9 fold higher force needed in the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffolds compared to the mesh group. Mean CT density at five different points inside the scaffold was 2385HU in the hydroxyapatite-coated group compared to 1978HU in the uncoated scaffold at nine months. Average lateral bone ingrowth after four months in the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffold group was up to the implant center, 12.1 mm on average, compared to 2.8 mm in the control group covered with mesh only. These properties make the investigated scaffold with multidirectional, stochastically distributed structure superior to all products currently on the market. The study gives a good idea of what future materials for cranioplasty might look like.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Cranioplasty: review of materials10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025 ↗
2. Reconstruction of skull defects: currently available materials10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b09b9a ↗
3. Cranioplasty10.1016/j.nec.2016.11.008 ↗
4. Cranioplasty: a comprehensive review of the history, materials, surgical aspects, and complications10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.211 ↗
5. Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty
6. Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents
7. Reconstruction of a large complex skull defect in a child: a case report and literature review10.1007/s00381-007-0413-7 ↗
8. Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 ↗
9. Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: a pilot study
10. Cranioplasty using customized 3-dimensional-printed titanium implants: an international collaboration effort to improve neurosurgical care10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.104 ↗
11. 3D-printer-assisted patient-specific polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: a case series of 16 consecutive patients10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.138 ↗
12. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions10.1186/1741-7015-9-66 ↗
13. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration
14. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty10.1007/s00701-006-0740-6 ↗
15. Complete osseointegration of a retrieved 3-D printed porous titanium cervical cage10.3389/fsurg.2020.526020 ↗
16. Excellent mid-term outcomes with a hemispheric titanium porous-coated acetabular component for total hip arthroplasty: 7-10 year follow-up
17. Effects of polylactide copolymer implants and platelet-rich plasma on bone regeneration within a large calvarial defect in sheep10.1155/2018/4120471 ↗
18. Wildburger · Tissue Eng. Part C Methods · 2017 · 23 · 40410.1089/ten.tec.2016.0549 ↗
19. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
20. Vascularized scapula and latissimus dorsi flap for CAD/CAM assisted reconstruction of mandibular defects including the mandibular condyle: technical report and clinical results10.1186/s12893-019-0535-3 ↗
21. Mandibular reconstruction10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.020 ↗
22. Virtual surgical planning in subscapular system free flap reconstruction of midface defects10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104508 ↗
23. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates--14 years experience10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827b98f3 ↗
24. Alloplastic cranioplasty reconstruction: a systematic review comparing outcomes with titanium mesh, polymethyl methacrylate, polyether ether ketone, and Norian implants in 3591 adult patients10.1097/SAP.0000000000001801 ↗
25. A retrospective comparative analysis of titanium mesh and custom implants for cranioplasty10.1093/neuros/nyz358 ↗
26. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model10.1089/neu.2011.1794 ↗
27. Characterization and distribution of mechanically competent mineralized tissue in micropores of β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes10.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.002 ↗
28. Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture10.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
29. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
30. The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo
31. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
32. Reconsidering osteoconduction in the era of additive manufacturing10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0047 ↗
33. Osteoconductive microarchitecture of bone substitutes for bone regeneration revisited10.3389/fphys.2018.00960 ↗
34. Bone response to implant surface morphology10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90201-7 ↗
35. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model10.2106/00004623-199509000-00015 ↗
36. Surface roughness of titanium orthopedic implants alters the biological phenotype of human MSCs10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0369 ↗
37. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037 ↗
38. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x ↗
39. Bone regeneration by the osteoconductivity of porous titanium implants manufactured by selective laser melting: a histological and micro computed tomography study in the rabbit10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0753 ↗
40. Mechanical properties of selective laser sintering pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V, and its anisotropy
41. Fabrication of customized Ti6AI4V heterogeneous scaffolds with selective laser melting: optimization of the architecture for orthopedic implant applications10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.040 ↗
42. Customized additive manufacturing of porous Ti6Al4V scaffold with micro-topological structures to regulate cell behavior in bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2020.111789 ↗
43. 3D printed titanium scaffolds with homogeneous diamond-like structures mimicking that of the osteocyte microenvironment and its bone regeneration study
44. A systematic review on the effect of inorganic surface coatings in large animal models and meta-analysis on tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite on periimplant bone formation
45. Cementless hydroxyapatite coated hip prostheses10.1155/2015/386461 ↗
46. Cranioplasty and craniofacial reconstruction: a review of implant material, manufacturing method and infection risk10.3390/app7030276 ↗
47. State-of-art of standard and innovative materials used in cranioplasty10.3390/polym13091452 ↗