journal article·2023-11

Optimize the pore size-pore distribution-pore geometry-porosity of 3D-printed porous tantalum to obtain optimal critical bone defect repair capability

Xueying Wang, Dachen Zhang, Haitao Peng, Jingzhou Yang, Yan Li, Jianxia Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

The treatment and reconstruction of large or critical size bone defects is a challenging clinical problem. Additive manufacturing breaks the technical difficulties of preparing complex conformation and anatomically matched personalized porous tantalum implants, but the ideal pore structure for 3D-printed porous tantalum in critical bone defect repair applications remains unclear. Guiding appropriate bone tissue regeneration by regulating proper pore size-pore distribution-pore geometry-porosity is a challenge for its fabrication and application. We fabricated porous tantalum (PTa) scaffolds with six different combinations of pore structures using powder bed laser melting (L-PBF) technology. In vitro biological experiments were conducted to systematically investigate the effects of pore structure characteristics on osteoblast behaviors, showing that the bionic trabecular structure with both large and small poress facilitated cell permeation, proliferation and differentiation compared to the cubic structure with uniform pore sizes. The osteogenesis of PTa with different porosity of trabecular structures was further investigated by a rabbit condyle critical bone defect model. Synthetically, T70% up-regulated the expression of osteogenesis-related genes (ALP, COLI, OCN, RUNX-2) and showed the highest bone ingrowth area and bone contact rate in vivo after 16 weeks, with the best potential for critical bone defect repair. Our results suggested that the bionic trabecular structure with a pore size distribution of 200-1200 μm, an average pore size of 700 μm, and a porosity of 70 % is the best choice for repairing critical bone defects, which is expected to guide the clinical application of clinical 3D-printed PTa scaffolds.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 ↗
2. The management of fractures with bone loss10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15874 ↗
3. Regenerative approaches for the treatment of large bone defects10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0281 ↗
4. Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques
5. Bone graft substitutes10.1586/17434440.3.1.49 ↗
6. Biodegradable magnesium alloy We43 porous scaffolds fabricated by laser powder bed fusion for orthopedic applications: process optimization, in vitro and in vivo investigation10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.020 ↗
7. Additive manufacturing of biodegradable metals: current research status and future perspectives10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046 ↗
8. Dental implants-associated release of titanium particles: a systematic review10.1111/clr.13372 ↗
9. Porous tantalum coatings prepared by vacuum plasma spraying enhance Bmscs osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo10.1371/journal.pone.0066263 ↗
10. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?10.1080/17453674.2016.1248315 ↗
11. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation after surgical treatment for an oropharyngeal malignant tumour using tantalum dental implants
12. Static compressive behavior and material failure mechanism of trabecular tantalum scaffolds fabricated by laser powder bed fusion-based additive manufacturing
13. Additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials10.1039/C9TB00420C ↗
14. Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6al4v Eli porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289 ↗
15. Large-pore-size Ti6al4v scaffolds with different pore structures for vascularized bone regeneration
16. Influence of porous tantalum scaffold pore size on osteogenesis and osteointegration: a comprehensive study based on 3d-printing technology10.1016/j.msec.2021.112382 ↗
17. Porosity of 3d biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
18. High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
19. Additive manufacturing of trabecular tantalum scaffolds by laser powder bed fusion: mechanical property evaluation and porous structure characterization10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110694 ↗
20. Porous structure and compressive failure mechanism of additively manufactured cubic-lattice tantalum scaffolds10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100183 ↗
21. Porous tantalum scaffolds: fabrication, structure, properties, and orthopedic applications10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110095 ↗
22. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
23. Biomimetic design strategy of complex porous structure based on 3d printing Ti-6al-4v scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110721 ↗
24. Surface wettability of macroporous anodized aluminum oxide10.1021/am4001425 ↗
25. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry10.1039/C4BM00291A ↗
26. Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.054 ↗
27. Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.01.022 ↗
28. Recent advances in scaffold design and material for vascularized tissue-engineered bone regeneration10.1002/adhm.201801433 ↗
29. Osteoblast recruitment to sites of bone formation in skeletal development, homeostasis, and regeneration10.1002/bdrc.21047 ↗
30. Controlled cell-seeding methodologies: a first step toward clinically relevant bone tissue engineering strategies10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0069 ↗
31. Yz · 2022
32. Albumin and fibronectin adsorption on treated titanium surfaces for osseointegration: an advanced investigation10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154023 ↗
33. Analysis of factors influencing bone ingrowth into three-dimensional printed porous metal scaffolds: a review10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.079 ↗
34. Engineering biomaterials to 3d-print scaffolds for bone regeneration: practical and theoretical consideration10.1039/D2BM00035K ↗
35. Structure-induced cell growth by 3d printing of heterogeneous scaffolds with ultrafine fibers10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108092 ↗
36. Geometry-driven cell organization determines tissue growths in scaffold pores: consequences for fibronectin organization10.1371/journal.pone.0073545 ↗
37. Cell proliferation and migration explain pore bridging dynamics in 3d printed scaffolds of different pore size
38. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
39. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth10.1098/rsif.2008.0064 ↗
40. Oxygen consumption, acidification and migration capacity of human primary osteoblasts within a three-dimensional tantalum scaffold10.1007/s10856-011-4384-6 ↗
41. Mathematical modeling of oxygen transfer in porous scaffolds for stem cell growth: the effects of porosity, cell type, scaffold architecture and cell distribution10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.10.016 ↗
42. Acidosis inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts in vitro by preventing mineralization10.1007/s00223-004-0285-8 ↗
43. Cellular behavior on Tio2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.021 ↗
44. Overexpression of Cbfa1 in osteoblasts inhibits osteoblast maturation and causes osteopenia with multiple fractures10.1083/jcb.200105052 ↗
45. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0148 ↗