Toward stronger robocast calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A mini-review and meta-analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Among different treatments of critical-sized bone defects, bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a fast-developing strategy centering around the fabrication of scaffolds that can stimulate tissue regeneration and provide mechanical support at the same time. This area has seen an extensive application of bioceramics, such as calcium phosphate, for their bioactivity and resemblance to the composition of natural bones. Moreover, recent advances in additive manufacturing (AM) have unleashed enormous potential in the fabrication of BTE scaffolds with tailored porous structures as well as desired biological and mechanical properties. Robocasting is an AM technique that has been widely applied to fabricate calcium phosphate scaffolds, but most of these scaffolds do not meet the mechanical requirements for load-bearing BTE scaffolds. In light of this challenge, various approaches have been utilized to mechanically strengthen the scaffolds. In this review, the current state of knowledge and existing research on robocasting of calcium phosphate scaffolds are presented. Applying the Gibson-Ashby model, this review provides a meta-analysis from the published literature of the compressive strength of robocast calcium phosphate scaffolds. Furthermore, this review evaluates different approaches to the mechanical strengthening of robocast calcium phosphate scaffolds. The aim of this review is to provide insightful data and analysis for future research on mechanical strengthening of robocast calcium phosphate scaffolds and ultimately for their clinical applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Normal bone anatomy and physiology10.2215/CJN.04151206 ↗
2. Synthetic and marine-derived porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.3390/ma11091702 ↗
3. Biological principles of bone graft healing10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80061-5 ↗
4. The management of fractures with bone loss10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15874 ↗
5. Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: a review
6. Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.013 ↗
7. The induction of bone formation: the translation enigma10.3389/fbioe.2018.00074 ↗
8. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199 ↗
9. Bioactive glasses: from parent 45S5 composition to scaffold-assisted tissue-healing therapies10.3390/jfb9010024 ↗
10. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.3390/ma3073867 ↗
11. 1.14 calcium phosphates and bone induction ☆
12. A comparison between bone reconstruction following the use of mesenchymal stem cells and total bone marrow in association with calcium phosphate scaffold in irradiated bone10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.051 ↗
13. Umbilical cord and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell seeding on macroporous calcium phosphate for bone regeneration in rat cranial defects10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.002 ↗
14. Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-directed bone regeneration in the dog mandible: a comparison between biphasic calcium phosphate and natural bone mineral10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.010 ↗
15. BMP-2, PDGF-BB, and bone marrow mesenchymal cells in a macroporous β -TCP scaffold for critical-size bone defect repair in rats10.1088/1748-6041/10/4/045008 ↗
16. Induction of bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and primary osteoblasts: induction of bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds10.1002/term.1511 ↗
17. Ishack · J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater · 2017 · 105 · 36610.1002/jbm.b.33561 ↗
18. Use of three-dimensionally printed β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic bone graft combined with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 to treat a severe radial atrophic nonunion in a Yorkshire terrier10.1111/vsu.13476 ↗
19. Repair of critical-sized long bone defects using dipyridamole-augmented 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds10.1002/jor.24424 ↗
20. 3D printing of bioceramic scaffolds—barriers to the clinical translation: from promise to reality, and future perspectives10.3390/ma12172660 ↗
21. Ceramic robocasting: recent achievements, potential, and future developments10.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
22. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials10.1002/adem.201400097 ↗
23. 3D printing of ceramics: a review10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
24. Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100736 ↗
25. Toward strong and tough glass and ceramic scaffolds for bone repair10.1002/adfm.201301121 ↗
26. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: state-of-the-art review and future challenges10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895 ↗
27. Bioinspired approaches to toughen calcium phosphate-based ceramics for bone repair10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104078 ↗
28. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050 ↗
29. Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: a review of properties and their influence on cell behavior10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.014 ↗
30. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review10.1039/C7BM00315C ↗
31. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 ↗
32. 3D printing of ceramic-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an overview10.1039/C8TB00677F ↗
33. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039 ↗
34. Processing and properties of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials for use as hard tissue replacement implants10.1557/JMR.1998.0015 ↗
35. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective10.1002/term.24 ↗
36. Structural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based three-dimensional printing10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.039 ↗
37. Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions — a 21st century perspective10.4248/BR201303002 ↗
38. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
39. Bone tissue engineering: A review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies10.1002/btpr.246 ↗
40. Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1155/2015/729076 ↗
41. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates10.1097/00003086-200202000-00009 ↗
42. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone
43. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
44. 1993
45. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
46. Scaffold vascularization: a challenge for three-dimensional tissue engineering10.2174/092986710793205327 ↗
47. Vascularization in tissue engineering10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009 ↗
48. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
49. Permeability evaluation of 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.030 ↗
50. Porous ceramic bone scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue regeneration10.1007/s10856-007-3346-5 ↗
51. Y. Kuboki et al “BMP-Induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: Topology of osteogenesis,” p. 10.
52. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
53. Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a tool for imaging cancellous bone10.1002/jbm.b.30529 ↗
54. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004006.90399.b4 ↗
55. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.021 ↗
56. Microporosity enhances bioactivity of synthetic bone graft substitutes10.1007/s10856-005-6988-1 ↗
57. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001 ↗
58. Geometry as a factor for tissue growth: towards shape optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds10.1002/adhm.201200159 ↗
59. Osteoinduction by foamed and 3D-printed calcium phosphate scaffolds: effect of nanostructure and pore architecture10.1021/acsami.7b14175 ↗
60. Pore geometry influences growth and cell adhesion of infrapatellar mesenchymal stem cells in biofabricated 3D thermoplastic scaffolds useful for cartilage tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2021.111933 ↗
61. Hexagonal pore geometry and the presence of hydroxyapatite enhance deposition of mineralized bone matrix on additively manufactured polylactic acid scaffolds10.1016/j.msec.2021.112091 ↗
62. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry10.1039/C4BM00291A ↗
63. Design of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00167 ↗
64. Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone recolonization in vitro and in vivo10.1023/A:1008973120918 ↗
65. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9 ↗
66. Exploring and engineering the cell surface Interface10.1126/science.1106587 ↗
67. B. Groessner-Schreiber R. S. Tuanf “Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro,” p. 12.
68. Effects of degradation and porosity on the load bearing properties of model hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds10.1002/jbm.a.30658 ↗
69. Biodegradation and bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics10.1016/0267-6605(93)90049-D ↗
70. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting10.1073/pnas.1003600107 ↗
71. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone10.1002/jbm.10259 ↗
72. Mechanisms of in vivo degradation and resorption of calcium phosphate based biomaterials10.3390/ma8115430 ↗
73. Concentrated hydroxyapatite inks for direct-write assembly of 3-D periodic scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.040 ↗
74. β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: synthesis and properties10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022 ↗
75. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
76. Bone tissue engineering with porous hydroxyapatite ceramics10.1007/s10047-005-0292-1 ↗
77. Sintering behaviour of calcium phosphate filaments for use as hard tissue scaffolds10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.04.013 ↗
78. Transformation of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramicsin vivo: ultrastructural and physicochemical characterization10.1002/jbm.820230806 ↗
79. Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting10.1002/jbm.a.31587 ↗
80. R. Z. Legeros S. Lin R. Rohanizadeh D. Mijares J. P. Legeros “Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics: preparation, properties and applications,” p. 9.
81. Effect of composition and macropore percentage on mechanical and in vitro cell proliferation and differentiation properties of 3D printed HA/β-TCP scaffolds10.1039/C7RA07204J ↗
82. Hydroxyapatite-carbon nanotube composites for biomedical applications: a review10.1111/j.1744-7402.2007.02113.x ↗
83. On the structural, mechanical, and biodegradation properties of HA/β-TCP robocast scaffolds: bone-substitute material in various tissue-engineering applications10.1002/jbm.b.32935 ↗
84. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
85. Direct ink writing of three-dimensional ceramic structures10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01382.x ↗
86. Colloidal inks for directed assembly of 3-D periodic structures10.1021/la0257135 ↗
87. Enhancement of mechanical properties of 3D-plotted tricalcium phosphate scaffolds by rapid sintering10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.05.055 ↗
88. Robotic deposition of model hydroxyapatite scaffolds with multiple architectures and multiscale porosity for bone tissue engineering10.1002/jbm.a.31072 ↗
89. Direct write assembly of calcium phosphate scaffolds using a water-based hydrogel10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.031 ↗
90. Robocasting of structural ceramic parts with hydrogel inks10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.001 ↗
91. Aggregation effects on the compressive flow properties and drying behavior of colloidal silica suspensions10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02090.x ↗
92. Munch · 2008 · 5
93. Cesarano · 1999
94. Directed colloidal assembly of 3D periodic structures
95. Effects of microwave sintering on the properties of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.08.091 ↗
96. Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.038 ↗
97. 3D printing of bioglass-reinforced β-TCP porous bioceramic scaffolds10.1007/s10853-019-03632-3 ↗
98. Sintering and robocasting of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications10.1016/j.actbio.2006.02.004 ↗
99. Biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by direct write assembly: mechanical, anti-microbial and osteoblastic properties10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.08.018 ↗
100. Coextrusion-based 3D plotting of ceramic pastes for porous calcium phosphate scaffolds comprised of hollow filaments10.3390/ma11060911 ↗